Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002347
Original file (20130002347.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		

		BOARD DATE:	  29 August 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130002347 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB).

2.  He states he was awarded the CIB for combat in Vietnam.  He was a rifleman assigned to A Company, 2d Battalion, 35th Infantry Regiment, 4th Infantry Division from 20 November 1969 to 2 November 1970.

3.  He provides his DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.


2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 24 June 1969.  Upon completion of basic and advanced individual training, he was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman).  He served in Vietnam from 21 November 1969 to 2 November 1970.

3.  His record contains a DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) that shows in:
	a.  item 38 (Record of Assignments) while serving in Vietnam he was assigned to A Company, 2d Battalion, 35th Infantry Regiment, 4th Infantry Division from 4 December 1969 to 28 October 1970 in duty MOS 11B (ammunition bearer); and

	b.  item 41 (Awards and Decorations) no entry for the CIB.

4.  On 23 June 1971, he was honorably released from active duty.  He completed 2 years of total active service.  The DD Form 214 he was issued at the time does not show the CIB as an awarded or authorized award.

5.  There are no orders in the available records that show he was recommended for or awarded the CIB.

6.  His record is void of evidence which shows he served in active ground combat and is also void of any orders or other documents indicating he was ever recommended for or awarded the CIB by proper authority while serving in Vietnam.

7.  A review of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System, an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the U.S. Army Human Resources Command, failed to reveal any orders for the CIB.

8.  U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 (Awards and Decorations) governed award of the CIB to Army forces operating in South Vietnam.  This regulation specifically stated that criteria for award of the CIB identified the Soldier who trained, lived, and fought as an infantryman and the CIB is the unique award established to recognize the infantryman and only the infantryman for his service.  Further, "the CIB was not an award for being shot at or for undergoing the hazards of day-to-day combat."  This regulation also stated the CIB was authorized for award to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer persons who have an infantry MOS and required that they must have served in active ground combat while assigned or attached to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller size.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Although the available evidence shows he was assigned to a qualifying unit and served in MOS 11B in Vietnam, his record is absent of evidence and he has not provided sufficient evidence to show he was engaged in active ground combat.

2.  In view of the foregoing, he is not entitled to the requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__x___  ___x_____  ______x___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      __________x_______________
               CHAIRPERSON

I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130002347





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130002347



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014010

    Original file (20140014010.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The instructions stated to enter the total period of active duty service performed outside the continental limits of the United States for the period covered by the DD Form 214 and the last overseas theater where service was performed (e.g., U.S. Army Pacific (USARPAC)) in item 22c (Foreign and/or Sea Service). As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007232

    Original file (20100007232.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). It further states that combat service alone is not a sufficient basis to support award of the CIB. The applicant's request to be awarded the CIB was carefully considered; however, there is insufficient evidence to grant relief.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018777

    Original file (20130018777.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His DD Form 214 does not show the CIB as an authorized award. The evidence shows the applicant held and served in an infantry MOS while assigned to an infantry company during his assignment in Vietnam. _______ _ _X______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009150

    Original file (20090009150.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Records show the applicant served in the Republic of Vietnam from 3 November 1968 to 24 January 1969. Additionally, appendix V of U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 provides that during the Vietnam era the Combat Infantryman Badge was awarded only to enlisted individuals who held and served in MOS 11B, 11C, 11D, 11F, 11G, or 11H. Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his records to show these two unit awards.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100008720

    Original file (20100008720.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3, Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register, shows that 1st Battalion, 14th Infantry, 4th Infantry Division was awarded the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation for the period 1 August 1967 to 31 October 1969 by Department of the Army General Order (DAGO) 53, dated 1970; and 1st Battalion, 35th Infantry, 4th Infantry Division was awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060012557

    Original file (20060012557.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 22 March 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060012557 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant states he was awarded the CIB in Vietnam but it was not recorded on his DD Form 214. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence as a basis to correct his DD Form 214 to show award of the CIB.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022568

    Original file (20110022568.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). His records do not contain orders awarding him the CIB. In the absence of official orders or other documentary evidence such as operation reports, after action reports, valor awards, witness statements, or any other evidence that conclusively shows he actively participated in ground combat while assigned to an infantry...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070002242C071029

    Original file (20070002242C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides for award of the CIB to a Soldier who is an infantryman satisfactorily performing infantry duties, who is assigned to an infantry unit during such time as the unit is engaged in active ground combat, and who actively participates in such ground combat. There is no evidence of record to show the applicant was awarded the CIB. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief and to excuse failure...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050004935C070206

    Original file (20050004935C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 17 November 2005 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20050004935 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. It states, in pertinent part, that a bronze service star is authorized with this award for each campaign a member is credited with participating in while serving in the RVN. However, in order to support award of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011172

    Original file (20100011172.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests: a. reconsideration of his previous application for correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB), and b. correction of his record to show award of the Bronze Star Medal (BSM). The evidence of record does not support the applicant's request for correction of his record to show award of the CIB and BSM. The evidence of record does not show the applicant was...