Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022568
Original file (20110022568.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	    15 May 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110022568 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB).

2.  The applicant states his DD Form 214 does not show his award of the CIB.  He believes the Board should grant his request because he served in Vietnam in the military occupational specialty (MOS) 11B (Infantryman) and as a combat Soldier.

3.  The applicant provides his DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 8 April 1968.  He completed training and he was awarded MOS 11B.

3.  He served in the Republic of Vietnam from 4 September 1968 to 30 August 1969, and was assigned to Company D, 2nd Battalion, 35th Infantry Regiment, 4th Infantry Division, as a rifleman.  

4.  His records do not contain orders awarding him the CIB.

5.  He was honorably released from active duty on 7 April 1970.  He completed 
2 years of total active service, 11 months and 27 days of which was credited as foreign service.  His DD Form 214 does not show award of the CIB.

6.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the CIB is awarded to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer persons who have an infantry military occupational specialty (MOS).  They must have served in active ground combat while assigned or attached to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental or smaller size.  Additionally, Appendix V of U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 (Awards and Decorations) states that during the Vietnam era the CIB was awarded only to enlisted individuals who held and served in MOS 11B, 11C, 11D, 11F, 11G, or 11H.

7.  U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation Number 672-1 specifically governed award of the CIB to Army forces operating in South Vietnam.  This regulation specifically stated that criteria for award of the CIB identified the man who trained, lived, and fought as an infantryman and the CIB is the unique award established to recognize the infantryman and only the infantryman for his service.  Further, "the CIB is not an award for being shot at or for undergoing the hazards of day to day combat."  This regulation also stated the CIB was authorized for award to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer persons who have an infantry MOS and required that they must have served in active ground combat while assigned or attached to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental or smaller size.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's infantry MOS and/or his service in Vietnam are not in question.  However, there is no evidence in the available records and he did not submit substantiating evidence that shows he was awarded the CIB or that he participated in active ground combat while assigned to an infantry unit.

2.  In the absence of official orders or other documentary evidence such as operation reports, after action reports, valor awards, witness statements, or any other evidence that conclusively shows he actively participated in ground combat while assigned to an infantry unit, there is insufficient evidentiary basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

3.  The applicant and all others concerned should know that this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by the applicant in service to our Nation.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X___  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _  X_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110022568



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110022568



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020234

    Original file (20090020234.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides for award of the CIB. In the absence of evidence that he served in active ground combat while assigned or attached to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental or smaller size, there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award of the CIB in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026236

    Original file (20100026236.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the CIB is awarded to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer persons who have an infantry MOS. ____________X____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110024765

    Original file (20110024765.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). His DD Form 214 does not show the CIB as an authorized award. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the CIB is awarded to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer persons who have an infantry MOS.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100008515

    Original file (20100008515.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). The evidence of record shows he completed training and he was awarded MOSs 11F and 11B.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014005

    Original file (20090014005.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There are no orders in the applicant's records that show he was awarded the CIB. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides for award of the CIB. During the Vietnam era, the CIB was awarded only to enlisted individuals who held and served in MOS 11B, 11C, 11F, 11G, or 11H.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002760

    Original file (20130002760.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests: a. award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) and "Wings" (correctly known as the Aircraft Crew Member Badge during the Vietnam era and currently known as the Aviation Badge); and b. the issuance of the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal and Vietnam Service Medal. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided for temporary and permanent award of the Aircraft Crew Member Badge. There is no evidence of record which shows he served in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070016540

    Original file (20070016540.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There are no orders or other evidence in the applicant’s military service records that show he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge. The applicant contends, in effect, that his request for award of the Combat Infantryman Badge should be reconsidered because he held MOS 11B as his secondary MOS, served in duty MOS 11B, and also served in combat situations during his second tour in the RVN. There are no orders or other evidence to show the applicant was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020613

    Original file (20140020613.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 9 July 2015 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140020613 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) and, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) to show award of the CIB and Korea Defense Service Medal (KDSM). As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding award of the KDSM to his DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020197

    Original file (20110020197.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, the evidence of record shows he held an administrative MOS and served with his infantry battalion as a clerk typist. There is no evidence in the available records and he did not submit evidence that shows he held an infantry MOS or that he was personally present and under hostile fire while serving in his assigned infantry duty, in an infantry unit that was actively engaged in ground combat with the enemy. Regretfully, in the absence of conclusive evidence that the applicant held...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080005811

    Original file (20080005811.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides for award of the CIB. The evidence of record shows that the applicant was awarded an infantry MOS; however, there is no evidence that the applicant was assigned to an infantry unit of brigade, regiment, or smaller size, and the applicant did not provide any evidence showing that he was directly involved in ground combat. In the absence of evidence that the applicant was an active participant in combat while assigned to an infantry unit,...