Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002334
Original file (20130002334.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  19 September 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130002334 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests cancellation of the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage.

2.  The applicant states he submitted the required DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel) declining SBP.  The Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) explained there was an error on the form and he was automatically enrolled in the SBP.  He is now divorced and currently has no beneficiary to warrant SBP.  He was medically discharged from the military for bilateral lower extremity amputations, traumatic brain injury, and post-traumatic stress disorder and has no memory of signing or not signing this form.  He relied heavily on his spouse for assistance.  He also has no memory of ever discussing the issue.

3.  The applicant provides:

* DD Form 2656 with a U.S. Mail postage return receipt
* DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty)
* 2011 divorce decree
* Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Rating Decision

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 5 October 2005.  He served in Iraq from 7 August 2006 through 13 September 2007.
2.  On 9 April 2010, an informal Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) convened and considered his medical conditions of anatomical loss of both feet through bilateral transfemoral amputations, ulnar neuropathy and radial neuropathy, right elbow limitation, and anxiety disorder.  The PEB found him unfit to reasonably perform the duties required by his grade and military specialty.  The PEB recommended the applicant be permanently retired and rated him at 100 percent disabled.  He concurred with the findings and recommendation of the PEB.

3.  He provides a copy of a DD Form 2656, dated 20 April 2010, showing he elected not to participate in the SBP.  His spouse concurred with his election and signed the form on the 19 April 2010, prior to him making his election.  The spouse’s concurrence was also witnessed and notarized on the same date.

4.  Section XII – SBP Spouse Concurrence of the DD Form 2656 specifies that the spouse’s concurrence is required when the member is married and does not elect full spouse coverage or declines coverage.  The options available and the effects of those options would be explained.  This block also specified that the date of the spouse’s signature in Item 32b MUST NOT be before the date of the member’s signature in Item 30b.  The spouse's signature MUST be notarized in Item 32.  It further states in Item 30, "Also, I have been counseled that I can terminate SBP participation, with my spouse's concurrence, within one year after the second anniversary of commencement of retired pay.  However, if I exercise my option to terminate the SBP, future participation is barred."

5.  He was permanently retired for disability on 20 May 2010.

6.  He provides:

* A final divorce decree that shows he and his spouse were granted a divorce on 7 March 2011; the decree does not show SBP coverage was stipulated for the former spouse

7.  On 6 September 2013, DFAS confirmed that the applicant was automatically enrolled in the SBP because his DD Form 2656 was incomplete.  The current 
cost is $95.91.  He is currently being paid solely by the VA, which would be the reason for the SBP debt.  The system does not show that he has an SBP debt.  DFAS believes when a member is being paid only by the VA, they can elect to have it deducted from their VA pay.  If the applicant did not do this, that would result in a debt.

8.  Public Law 92-425, the SBP, enacted 21 September 1972, provided that military members on active duty could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents.
9.  Public Law 105-85 (18 November 1997) established the option to terminate SBP participation for member retired less than 2 years on the effective date may terminate participation, with the spouse’s concurrence and release of requirement to provide former SBP, if appropriate during the 1-year period commencing on the second anniversary of their receipt of retire pay.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record shows the applicant submitted a DD Form 2656 to DFAS declining SBP in April 2010, prior to his permanent retirement for disability on 20 May 2010.  His spouse at the time concurred with his election.  However, his spouse signed the form before he did.  They divorced in 2011 and their divorce decree did not stipulate SBP coverage for her as a former spouse.

2.  According to DFAS he was automatically enrolled in SBP because the
DD Form 2656 he submitted was incomplete and he is currently enrolled in SBP. 

3.  His spouse signed the DD Form 2656 one day earlier, but it is clear they both intended to decline, especially given the short length of the marriage.  Also, the SBP counselor should have seen the problem, so there is evidence of failure on the government's part.  The DD Form 2656 states the options available would be explained to the spouse and the spouse must not sign and date the form before the member does.  

4.  Therefore, as a matter of equity in this case, his records should be corrected to show he elected to decline the SBP with his spouse’s concurrence.

BOARD VOTE:

___x____  ____x___  ____x___  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

	a.  showing the applicant's DD Form 2656 was properly completed and signed by his then spouse and witness on 20 April 2010; and

	b.  showing his DD Form 2656 was timely received and processed by DFAS for declination of SBP.



      _______ _   _x______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130002334



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130002334



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130001743

    Original file (20130001743.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On this same form, he elected coverage for his spouse, the applicant, based on his full retired pay. The applicant contends, in effect, that the records of her former spouse, a retired member of the USAR, should be corrected to show he changed his RCSBP election from spouse coverage to former spouse coverage. The available evidence shows that when the applicant's spouse requested retired pay in 2005, he had also requested SBP coverage for the applicant who was his spouse at the time.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014732

    Original file (20090014732.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In section IX (SBP Election) of this form, the applicant checked that he elected coverage for spouse only, based on full gross pay. There is no evidence of record and he does not provide any evidence to show that he completed a new DD Form 2656 prior to his retirement date. DFAS indicated the applicant requested termination of his SBP coverage in October 2009.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011734

    Original file (20100011734.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In effect, she requests correction of her records to show, at the time she retired, she elected not to participate in the SBP. Although she and her spouse failed to make the election before her retirement, it appears the RSO counselor also failed to inform her or her spouse that the SBP election was required to be signed and dated before the effective date of her retirement. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007495

    Original file (20140007495.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show he elected Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage for his spouse within one year of his remarriage. The applicant provides: * DD Form 2656-6, dated 4 April 2014 * Certificate of marriage (Connie), dated 12 February 2013 * Emails to DFAS * Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay at Age 60 * DD Form 1883 (SBP Election Certificate) * DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel), dated 7 July 2008 * National Guard...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150009327

    Original file (20150009327.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows the applicant submitted a DD Form 2656 and a DD Form 2656-1 wherein he elected to participate in the SBP for former spouse and children coverage pursuant to a written agreement previously entered into voluntarily as part of divorce proceedings and incorporated in a court order. The divorce proceedings do not compel the applicant to provide SBP coverage for his former spouse. Although the applicant indicated on the forms that he entered into a written agreement...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005404

    Original file (20120005404.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage from "spouse" to "former spouse" within 1 year of his divorce. It also stated that "by law" upon receipt of this letter, a qualified Reserve Component member, who was married, would automatically be enrolled in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) under Option C, Spouse and Child(ren) coverage based on Full Retired Pay, unless spouse concurrence was provided to allow...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020233

    Original file (20130020233.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    She also states "I was not married to [Applicant] when in February 2006 when his election started." Although he previously provided a statement from his spouse who stated she was not married to the applicant in February 2006, the Complaint for Divorce indicated they were married on 28 August 2006, and his DD Form 2656 shows he married her on 25 April 1998 and at the time of his election on 14 February 2006 they were still married. In the absence of the primary document (i.e., the marriage...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001462

    Original file (20110001462.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the retiree had elected spouse coverage at retirement or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. The evidence of record shows at the time of the applicant's retirement, he completed an SBP election form wherein he elected SBP former spouse coverage based on a settlement agreement that was incorporated into his divorce decree. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019397

    Original file (20110019397.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant, a retired former service member, requests that his military records be corrected to show he elected former spouse coverage under the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) for C____ K____, his former spouse, who will simply be referred to as his former spouse throughout the remainder of these proceedings. The applicant provides copies of his divorce decree; his election for former spouse coverage, dated 3 May 2002; an unsigned DD Form 2293; a letter from his lawyer;...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001913

    Original file (20150001913.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * he never received a 20-year letter because he had issues with his retirement points and active time * after his points were corrected, he still did not receive a 20-year letter and was thus not given an opportunity to make an election * once he became retirement eligible, his retirement orders were issued in 2013 and backdated to 2006 * at the time of his retirement, he completed a DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel) * he was not married; he placed...