Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002302
Original file (20130002302.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:  27 August 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130002302 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his general discharge be upgraded to a fully honorable discharge.

2.  The applicant states that his discharge was changed to a general discharge by a private because he was being released from the stockade at Camp Kilmer, New Jersey.  However, he was being discharged for hardship and should have received an honorable discharge because his discharge was never stated in a court-martial.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2.  The applicant's military records are not available for review.  A fire destroyed approximately 18 million service members' records at the National Personnel Records Center in 1973.  It is believed the applicant's records were lost or destroyed in that fire.  However, the document provided by the applicant is sufficient to conduct a fair and impartial review of this case.

3.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 6 May 1952.  He completed his training and was transferred to Korea where he served with the 223rd Infantry Regiment during one campaign and was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge on 18 July 1953 (fighting ended on 27 July 1953).  He had served 3 months and 21 days of foreign service when he was returned to the United States.

4.  The facts and circumstances surrounding his discharge are not present in the available records.  However, his DD Form 214 which was authenticated by an officer and the applicant shows that he was released from active duty under honorable conditions at Camp Kilmer on 4 September 1954 due to hardship under the provisions of Army Regulation 615-362.  He was serving in the rank of private (E-1) with an effective date of 14 January 1954.  He had served 1 year, 
6 months and 19 days of active service and had 190 days of lost time due to being absent without leave (AWOL) and in confinement.

5.  There is no evidence available to show that he ever applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board’s 
15-year statute of limitations.

6.  Army Regulation 615-362, in effect at the time, served as the authority for the separation of enlisted personnel for minority, dependency or hardship.  It provided, in pertinent part, that individuals would be separated with an honorable or general discharge as deemed appropriate based on the individual’s record of service at the time of separation.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  In the absence of evidence to the contrary, it must be presumed that the applicant’s administrative separation was accomplished in compliance with applicable regulations with no indication of procedural errors which would have jeopardized his rights.

2.  The type of discharge directed and the reasons therefore were appropriate considering all of the available facts of the case.

3.  It appears apparent based on the date of his pay grade and the fact that he had 190 days of lost time that his service did not rise to the level of a fully honorable discharge, especially given the fact that the applicant has offered no evidence or mitigating circumstances.

4.  Accordingly, there appears to be no basis to upgrade his discharge to a fully honorable discharge.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ____X___  ___X__ _  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  The Board wants the applicant and all others concerned to know that this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by the applicant in service to the United States during the Korean War.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.



      _______ _  X ______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130002302



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130002302



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016525

    Original file (20130016525.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 10 June 2014 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20130016525 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states he is asking for reconsideration based on his service in Korea as a paratrooper and his receiving a Purple Heart on 5 October 1953 for wounds received in combat in Korea while serving with the 187th Regimental Combat Team (RCT) at Pork Chop Hill. The facsimile of a Purple Heart Certificate provided by the applicant is new evidence, which requires that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060901C070421

    Original file (2001060901C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides for award of the Korean Service Medal. Based upon a review of the applicant's available records and pertinent Army regulations, the applicant is entitled to the Good Conduct Medal, the National Defense Service Medal, the Korean Service Medal (with 2 Bronze Service Stars), United Nations Service Medal, and the Republic of Korea Presidential Unit Citation. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070004115

    Original file (20070004115.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 9 August 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20070004115 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The records available to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records were provided in part by the applicant and from reconstructed records. On 14 August 1953, the appropriate authority approved the applicant's...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015955

    Original file (20130015955.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He provides: * Self-authored statement * Report of Proceedings by a Board of Officers with an extract of time lost, statement and certificate by commanding officer, and outpatient index * Special Orders Number 190, dated 16 August 1954 * Special Orders Number 197, dated 24 August 1954 * Special Orders Number 184, dated 9 August 1954 * VA Form 686c (Declaration of Marital Status), dated 1 November 1954 * WD AGO Form 53 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation – Honorable Discharge) * Two DD...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000205

    Original file (20090000205.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement or discharge. The evidence of records shows the applicant was honorably released from active duty on 24 April 1954 and transferred to the Enlisted Reserve Corps to complete the remainder of his 8 year service obligation under the Universal Military Training and Service Act.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012464

    Original file (20140012464.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, award of the Republic of Korea War Service Medal and correction of his records to show it. The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) * Congressional correspondence * Criteria for the Korean Service Medal * Criteria for the Republic of Korea War Service Medal * Letter from the National Personnel Records Center * Special Orders (SO) Number 7, dated 7 April 1954 * SO Number 122, dated 1 June 1954 *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016015

    Original file (20140016015.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant states, in effect, that he is being denied medical benefits from the VA because he received a “Class III” discharge that he never requested. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1900-1979 | 5708212A

    Original file (5708212A.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant submitted a request for a hardship discharge in September 1952 to be with his family in Texas which was denied. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the individual concerned was separated from the service on 2 September 1954 with a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074741C070403

    Original file (2002074741C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. APPLICANT STATES : In effect, that he finished his tour of duty and served 6 months of confinement, as a result of a special court-martial. On 14 January 1954, the applicant’s commander initiated a request to have the applicant appear before a board of officers to determine if he should be discharged under the provisions of Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018230

    Original file (20080018230.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) be corrected in Block 28 (Most Significant Duty Assignment) to show “1745 Co E 180th INF RGT 45th ID” and “1745 35th INF RGT 25th ID.” 2. Army Reserve Special Order Number 7, Headquarters, New York Military District (Army Reserve), New York, NY, dated 11 January 1955, shows the applicant as having a primary MOS of 1740 and a secondary MOS of 1745. Block 28 of the version of the DD Form...