BOARD DATE: 7 May 2015 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140016015 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). 2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any). THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests that the reason and authority for his separation be changed to a more favorable reason that will qualify him for Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) benefits. 2. The applicant states, in effect, that he is being denied medical benefits from the VA because he received a “Class III” discharge that he never requested. 3. The applicant provides two letters explaining his application and copies of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States), discharge letter and dependency certificate. CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing. 2. The applicant’s military records are not available for review. A fire destroyed approximately 18 million service members' records at the National Personnel Records Center in 1973. It is believed the applicant's records were lost or destroyed in that fire. However, the documents provided by the applicant are sufficient to conduct a fair and impartial review of this case. 3. The applicant was inducted on 17 September 1952. He completed his training as a medical aidman and he was transferred to the 516th Medical Company in Germany. 4. The letter provided by the applicant explains that he received a 9-month deferment prior to his induction because he was self-employed and his parents depended on him. He goes on to state that while stationed in Germany his father passed away and he returned to the United States on leave and was told to report to the Pentagon where he was questioned about his dependency. He was subsequently advised that he was to be discharged; however, it was 9 years later that he received his discharge and when he sought medical help from the VA, he was informed that he was not eligible because he had received a “Class III” discharge. 5. On 24 July 1953, he was honorably discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 615-362, section III, due to hardship. He had served 10 months and 7 days of active service. 6. Army Regulation 615-362, in effect at the time, served as the authority for the separation of enlisted personnel for dependency or hardship. It provides, in pertinent part, that an individual may, in the discretion of the Secretary of the Army, be separated when, by reasons of death or disability of a member of his family occurring after enlistment or induction, members of the enlisted person’s family become principally dependent upon him for care and support or if his separation from the service would materially affect the care and support of his family members by alleviating undue hardship. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: 1. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, it must be presumed that the applicant’s discharge was conducted in accordance with the regulations then in effect, with no violations of any of the applicant’s rights. 2. While it is indeed unfortunate that he may not qualify for VA benefits, the Board does not have jurisdiction over the VA as they operate under their own set of laws and regulations. Additionally, the Board does not change a properly issued discharge simply to qualify individuals for benefits. 3. Therefore, given the available evidence, there appears to be no error or injustice to correct in his case. BOARD VOTE: ________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING ___X_____ ___X_____ ___X_ DENY APPLICATION BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION: The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned. __________X_____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20140016015 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20140016015 2 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1