Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002277
Original file (20130002277.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  10 September 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130002277 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his reentry (RE) code be changed from a “3” to a “1.”

2.  The applicant states that as of 2009 he has been cleared of the condition for which he was discharged and he now desires to rejoin the military as an officer and serve his country.

3.  The applicant provides a letter explaining his application, a Medical Report dated 1 December 2009 with the findings, and a Pulmonary Function Report.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.


2.  On 31 July 2002, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army (RA) for 5 years, training as an infantryman under the Ranger enlistment option, and a cash enlistment bonus.  He completed one-station unit training at Fort Benning, Georgia and he was transferred to Fort Bragg, North Carolina for his first duty station.

3.  He was subsequently transferred back to Fort Benning to undergo airborne training and he was then transferred to Fort Drum, New York for his last assignment.

4.  He deployed to Afghanistan with his unit during the period 28 August 2003 through 16 June 2004 and he returned to Fort Drum.  He was advanced to pay grade E-4 on 15 January 2005.  

5.  On 14 August 2005 he was honorably discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-40, paragraph 4-24B(3), due to disability with severance pay.  He had served 3 years and 14 days of active service and he was assigned a separation code of “JFL” and an RE code of “3.”

6.  Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or reason for discharge.  Army Regulation 601-210 covers eligibility criteria, policies, and procedures for enlistment and processing into the RA and the U.S. Army Reserve.  Chapter 3 prescribes basic eligibility for prior service applicants for enlistment.  That chapter includes a list of armed forces RE codes, including RA RE codes.

7.  An RE code of 3 applies to persons not qualified for continued Army service, but the disqualification is waivable.  A waiting period of 2 years from separation is required before a waiver may be submitted through a local recruiting office.  Waivers are granted based on the needs of the service at the time of application.  Inasmuch as needs change over time, individuals are encouraged to contact their nearest recruiting office periodically to determine the needs of the service at the time.  The applicable regulations direct that an RE code of 3 be assigned for a separation code of “JFL,” which indicates separation for disability with severance pay.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s administrative separation was accomplished in accordance with applicable regulations with no indication of any violations of the applicant’s rights.

2.  The applicant was separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 
635-40, paragraph 4-24B(3) and properly assigned an RE code of 3 based on his reason for discharge in accordance with the applicable regulations.

3.  The applicant’s contentions have been noted.  However, there are procedures whereby the applicant can apply to a local recruiter for a waiver of his RE code if he is in fact physically qualified and the needs of the service at the time justify his return.  

4.  The Board wants the applicant and all others concerned to know that this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by the applicant in service to our Nation.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X____  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      __________X_____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130002277



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130002277



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019785

    Original file (20110019785.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD)) Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214. It states that the SPD code JFL is the appropriate code to assign to Soldiers separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-40, paragraph 4-24b(3) by reason of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012195

    Original file (20080012195.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 16 October 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080012195 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Table 2-3 (SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table), Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), in effect, at the time, established RE code 4 as the proper reentry code to assign to Soldiers separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-40, paragraph 4-24e(3) for disability, severance pay. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018611

    Original file (20140018611.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was issued an RE code of "3" with a separation code of "JFL" when he was separated, which precludes him from reentering military service. It shows the SPD code of "JFL" is the appropriate code to assign Soldiers separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-40, paragraph 4-24b(3), based on separation for physical disability with severance pay. The evidence of record shows the applicant was found physically unfit for continued military service based on a disability that was rated...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018254

    Original file (20080018254.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, that the reentry (RE) code and narrative reason for separation listed on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be changed. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010934

    Original file (20090010934.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations) states, in pertinent part, that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge. Army Regulation 601-210 (Regular Army and Army Reserve Enlistment Program), covers eligibility criteria, policies, and procedures for enlistment and processing into the Regular Army (RA) and the USAR. The SPD code of JFL is the correct code for Soldiers separating...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050010966C070206

    Original file (20050010966C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Accordingly, he was honorably discharged on 22 August 1998, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-40, paragraph 4-24B(3) due to disability, with severance pay. A waiting period of 2 years from separation is required before a waiver may be submitted. The applicant was separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-40 and was properly issued an RE Code of RE-3 in accordance with the applicable regulations.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005772

    Original file (20120005772.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence of record confirms the applicant was initially separated from active duty under the provisions of paragraph 4-22b(2), Army Regulation 635-40, by reason of disability, temporary, and that he was placed on the TDRL. By regulation, the SPD code of JFL and RE code of 3 would be the code to assign members who are separated by reason of disability with severance pay. Therefore, absent any medical evidence that calls into question the validity of the rating decision of the PEB at the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089685C070403

    Original file (2003089685C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The separation document (DD Form 214) issued to the applicant on the date of his separation confirms that the authority for his discharge was paragraph 4-24b(3), Army Regulation 635-40, and the reason for his separation was physical disability with severance pay. Thus, the Board concludes that it would be appropriate to change the applicant’s RE code to RE- 3 at this time. Those individuals can best advise a former service member as to the needs of the Army at the time, and are required to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010372

    Original file (20080010372.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) show that he was separated from the Army in accordance with Army Regulation 635-40, paragraph 4-24b(3), disability, severance pay, with a Separation Code of "JFL" and a RE Code of "3." His DD Form 214 stated that he was separated from the Army in accordance with Army Regulation 635-40, paragraph 4-24b(3), disability, severance pay, with a Separation Code JFL and a RE Code of 3. Pertinent Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003896

    Original file (20090003896.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was rated under the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) and was granted a 10-percent disability rating for code 8299 and 8211 (moderate paralysis of doroscapular nerve) and a 10-percent disability rating for code 5295 (mechanical low back pain). The PEB recommended a 20 percent combined rating and that the applicant be separated with entitlement to severance pay if otherwise qualified. The Army rates only conditions determined to be physically unfitting at the time of...