RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 27 APRIL 2006
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20050010966
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.
| |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | |Director |
| |Mr. Jessie B. Strickland | |Analyst |
The following members, a quorum, were present:
| |Mr. Lester Echols | |Chairperson |
| |Mr. John Meixell | |Member |
| |Ms. Naomi Henderson | |Member |
The Board considered the following evidence:
Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.
Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests that his Reentry (RE) Code be changed to a more
favorable code that will allow him to again enlist in the service and enter
active duty.
2. The applicant states that while there is no error in his case, he has
since healed and has been evaluated by a regular doctor and orthopedic
doctor who indicate that he no longer has a problem.
3. The applicant provides statements from two physicians with his
application.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error which
occurred on 22 August 1998. The application submitted in this case was
received on 1 August 2005.
2. Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for
correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery
of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law allows the Army
Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file
within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines that it
would be in the interest of justice to do so. In this case, the ABCMR will
conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in
the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.
3. He enlisted in the Regular Army in Phoenix, Arizona, on 10 September
1996 for a period of 3 years and training as a combat engineer. He
completed his One Station Unit Training (OSUT) at Fort Leonard Wood,
Missouri, and was transferred to Fort Benning, Georgia, for his first duty
assignment. He was advanced to the pay grade of E-3 on 1 March 1998.
4. On 22 June 1998, after being evaluated by a Medical Evaluation Board
(MEB), a Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) convened at Fort Sam Houston,
Texas, determined that the applicant suffered from Retropatellar Pain
Syndrome, Left Knee, and that his chronic pain with activity and his
physical profile restrictions precluded him from performing the duties of
his military occupational specialty. The PEB found that he was physically
unfit and recommended a disability rating of 10%. The applicant concurred
with the findings and recommendations of the PEB and waived a formal
hearing of his case.
5. The appropriate authority approved the findings and recommendations of
the PEB on 26 June 1998.
6. Accordingly, he was honorably discharged on 22 August 1998, under the
provisions of Army Regulation 635-40, paragraph 4-24B(3) due to disability,
with severance pay. He had served 1 year, 11 months and 13 days of total
active service and was paid $4,316.40 in disability severance pay benefits.
He was assigned a Separation Code of “JFL” and an RE Code of “3”.
7. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release
from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their
service records or the reason for discharge. Army Regulation 601-210
covers eligibility criteria, policies, and procedures for enlistment
processing into the Regular Army and the USAR. Chapter 3 of that
regulation prescribes basic eligibility for prior service applicants for
enlistment. That chapter includes a list of armed forces RE codes which
reflects that Separation Code “JFL” requires a RE Code of “3”.
8. RE-3 applies to persons not qualified for continued Army service, but
the disqualification is waivable. A waiting period of 2 years from
separation is required before a waiver may be submitted. Individuals may
apply for a waiver through their nearest recruiting office. Approval and
disapproval of waivers are normally based on the needs of the Service at
the time and the overall circumstances surrounding the individual’s
previous separation.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must
show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily
appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to
submit evidence that would satisfy that requirement.
2. The applicant’s administrative separation was accomplished in
accordance with applicable regulations with no indication of any violations
of the applicant’s rights.
3. The applicant was separated under the provisions of Army Regulation
635-40 and was properly issued an RE Code of RE-3 in accordance with the
applicable regulations.
4. Accordingly, the proper approach for the applicant to obtain reentry
into military service would be to periodically check with his local
recruiting office, with his documentation to substantiate his claim that
his disability no longer exists, and to apply for a waiver to reenter the
service.
5. Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or
injustice now under consideration on 22 August 1998; therefore, the time
for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or
injustice expired on 21 August 2001. The applicant did not file within the
3-year statute of limitations and has not provided a compelling explanation
or evidence to show that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse
failure to timely file in this case.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
___LE __ ___JM___ ___NH __ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
1. The Board determined that the evidence presented does not demonstrate
the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board
determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis
for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
2. As a result, the Board further determined that there is no evidence
provided which shows that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse
the applicant's failure to timely file this application within the 3-year
statute of limitations prescribed by law. Therefore, there is insufficient
basis to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing or for
correction of the records of the individual concerned.
______Lester Echols______
CHAIRPERSON
INDEX
|CASE ID |AR20050010966 |
|SUFFIX | |
|RECON | |
|DATE BOARDED |20060427 |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE |HD |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE |19980822 |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY |AR 635-40, Para 4-24B(3) |
|DISCHARGE REASON |DISABILITY, SEVERANCE PAY |
|BOARD DECISION |(DENY) |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY |AR 15-185 |
|ISSUES |4/RE CODE |
|1.100.0300 | |
|2. | |
|3. | |
|4. | |
|5. | |
|6. | |
-----------------------
[pic]
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050003854C070206
Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. The SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table in effect at the time established RE- 3 as the appropriate code to assign members separated under these provisions, this RE code assignment remains in effect under the current regulation. Those individuals can best advise a former service member as to the needs of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070001975
Prior service applicants requesting enlistment in the Army who have correct RE codes will be processed for a waiver at their request, if otherwise qualified and waiver is authorized. There is no evidence of record, and the applicant fails to provide evidence, to show that his commanding officer expressed that if the applicant could not deploy overseas he would be separated and receive an unacceptable RE Code. The evidence of record shows that the applicant was separated from the Army based...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080000242
On 20 July 1998, the PEB determined the Applicant's injury prevented reasonable performance of duties required by grade and military specialty. The characterization of service for Soldiers separated under the provisions of Chapter 4, AR 635-40 will normally be honorable unless the Soldier is in an entry-level status. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the Applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070017357
The PEB determined that the applicant was physically unfit for duty and recommended that he be separated with severance pay with a combined rating of zero percent. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. However, RE code 3 is the appropriate RE code for a Soldier separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-40, paragraph 4-24b(3) for...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060010896
Current ENL Service: 03 Yrs, 04 Mos, 13 Days ????? A Soldier is in an entry-level status if the Soldier has not completed more than 180 days of creditable continuous active duty prior to the initiation of separation action. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: MARY E. SHAW DATE: 1 August 2007 Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army Chief, Secretary Recorder ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090183C070212
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The Board also carefully considered the supporting doctor’s letter provided by the applicant that indicates that he is now physically able to perform active duty service. In view of the circumstances in this case, the Board finds the RE-3 code was appropriately assigned based on the authority and reason for the applicant’s discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100008257
Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. The "JFL" SPD code is the correct code for Soldiers separating (involuntarily) under chapter 4 of Army Regulation 635-40 by reason of disability. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by changing his RE code from 4 to 3.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023029
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. Army Regulation 40-501, paragraph 3-45 states Soldiers will be referred to an MEB after an episode of heat stroke or exertional rhabdomyolysis.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070007183
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. Chapter 3 of that regulation prescribes basic eligibility for prior service applicants for enlistment and includes a list of armed forces RE Codes including RA RE codes. The SPD code of JFL was the appropriate code for the applicant based upon the guidance provided in Army Regulation 635-5-1 for Soldiers separating under the provisions of AR 635-40, paragraph 4-24B(3) for disability with severance pay.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019785
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD)) Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214. It states that the SPD code JFL is the appropriate code to assign to Soldiers separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-40, paragraph 4-24b(3) by reason of...