Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130001178
Original file (20130001178.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		

		BOARD DATE:	  24 September 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130001178 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his record to entitle him to an Officer Accession Bonus (OAB).

2.  The applicant states the OAB Addendum with a valid control number was submitted into his records without the signature of any Massachusetts Army National Guard (MAARNG) officials. 

3.  The applicant provides in support of his request:

* Officer/Warrant Officer Accession Bonus Addendum, dated 7 August  2010
* His own sworn statement, dated 8 May 2012
* DA Form 1059 (Service School Academic Report), dated 12 October 2011
*  National Guard Bureau (NGB) memorandum, dated 10 September 2012
* His Soldier Information Management and Reporting Center (iMARC) record.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

 1.  The applicant enlisted in the MAARNG on 7 December 2009.


2.  Documents in his iPERMS show the following pertinent events:

* 14 January 2010 - MAARNG transferred the applicant between units
* 7 August 2010 - The applicant signed Officer/Warrant OAB Agreement with Bonus Control Number 010080002MA-No service representative or witness signatures
* 19 August 2010 - The applicant took the Oath of Office as a second lieutenant (2LT) in the MAARNG
* 25 August 2010 - Massachusetts State Office of the Adjutant appointed him 2LT in the ARNG
* 21 December 2010 - NGB extended him initial appointment Federal Recognition (FEDREC) as a Transportation Corps 2LT in the MAARNG
* 23 August 2010 - MAARNG discharged the applicant from the ARNG and as a Reserve of the Army effective 18 August 2010
* 3 June 2011 - The applicant took the Oath of Office as a 2LT in the Arkansas ARNG (ARARNG)
* 11 July 2011 -  Arkansas State Office of the Adjutant appointed him a 2LT in the ARARNG
* 21 July 2011 - NGB extended him FEDREC as a Transportation Corps 2LT in the ARARNG
 
3.  The applicant submitted in support of his request the following:

	a.  His personal sworn statement to the effect that the OAB and the Bonus Control Number are actual and valid.  He signed the document in front of his Officer Strength Manager and his prior Officer Strength Manager has confirmed that he initiated the bonus paperwork before the applicant completed the accelerated Officer Candidate School in the summer of 2010.  He has corresponded with them regarding the bonus and they both agree that the bonus addendum is binding and official.

	b.  The NGB's 10 September 2012 response to the Arkansas State Incentive Manager's request for an exception to policy explained that request would not be approved because the addendum was not signed by the appropriate government officials.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: 

1.  The OAB addendum is clearly incomplete in that it is not signed and witnessed by the appropriate government officials.


2.  The applicant swore that he corresponded with individuals who know the OAB addendum is valid.  Yet, he failed to provide copies of said correspondence from these individuals.  He also provided no indication of how they thought this document could have been entered into his record without being properly completed. 

3.  The requested relief is not appropriate because the applicant does not have a valid contract and he has not provided sufficient substantiation that there was ever any intent on the part of any authorized official to provide him with the bonus.   
    
BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

_X____  ___X_____  __X______  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _ X  _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130001178



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130001178



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002944

    Original file (20120002944.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests to be paid his second $5,000.00 installment payment of his officer accession bonus (OAB). Title 37, U.S. Code, section 308j(b), states the Secretary concerned may pay an accession bonus under this section to an eligible person who enters into an agreement with the Secretary to: (a) accept an appointment as an officer in the Armed Forces and (b) to serve in the Selected Reserve of the Ready Reserve in a skill designated under paragraph (2) for a period specified in the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018947

    Original file (20110018947.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In June 2011, he received an email stating the NGB had again denied his request and he was told he could file a claim with the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) if he believed an error or injustice still existed. When the applicant graduated from OCS and was accessed into the WVARNG, it was the applicant's understanding that he was eligible for the $10,000.00 OAB after completing BOLC. Attached to the memorandum was an OAB addendum signed by the applicant on 12 August...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013486

    Original file (20110013486.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests payment of his Officer Accession Bonus (OAB) of $10,000. His Written Agreement - OAB Addendum shows that he was being accessed into the ARNG in a critical skill area of concentration/military occupational specialty and was to receive a bonus of $10,000 paid in two 50 percent installments. Based on the above, his records should be corrected to show that he signed the Written Agreement - OAB Addendum on 22 May 2009, the date of his appointment, and is fully eligible to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001722

    Original file (20120001722.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests payment of a $10,000 Selected Reserve Officer Accession Bonus (OAB). It was not uncommon to complete an appointment packet without a BCN as one of the noncommissioned officers would complete the bonus form and request a BCN before the packet was forwarded to G-1. He was appointed as a 2LT in the OKARNG and executed an Oath of Office on 19 March 2009 and he completed BOLC on 30 November 2010.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021460

    Original file (20130021460.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 12 August 2011, he was appointed as a Reserve commissioned officer of the Army, in the rank of 2LT, and he signed an oath of office. In this memorandum, his commander stated: * the applicant was erroneously counseled that his AOC was not eligible for the OAB * the applicant contacted CPT Mxxxxx, an Officer Strength Manager, requesting a letter of acceptance (LOA) for appointment as a Signal Corps officer in AOC 25A, the branch he was to be assigned as indicated on his Department of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002950

    Original file (20120002950.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests payment of a $10,000.00 officer accession bonus (OAB) for his appointment as a second lieutenant (2LT) in the California Army National Guard (CAARNG). The official stated the applicant was appointed to the CAARNG in the critical AOC of 92A; however, the OAB Addendum was only signed and dated by a witnessing officer and not the applicant. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The evidence of record shows an OAB Addendum was executed for the applicant on 8 April 2010 for an OAB...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007834

    Original file (20140007834.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 19 June 2014 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140007834 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The MAARNG G-1 stated that the applicant's OAB should be terminated effective 12 March 2012. The ARNG offers a $10,000 Officer Accession/Affiliation Bonus to newly-commissioned officers and newly-appointed warrant officers who agree to serve 6 years in a Modified Table of Organization and Equipment (MTOE) unit.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017550

    Original file (20140017550.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The memoranda state: * the applicant accepted his commission as a chaplain on 15 July 2012 * he signed his OAB Addendum on 4 November 2012, which was after the date of commission * according to policy, OAB Addenda signed after the date of commissioning are not authorized * the OAB Addendum, dated 1 March 2009, was an obsolete form * he should have signed an OAB agreement generated by the Guard Incentive Management System (GIMS) upon request of the BCN * the recruiting officer failed to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020949

    Original file (20130020949.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He stated he had received the first installment of $5,000.00 on 17 June 2011 and that although the Bonus Addendum could not be located, the incentive was offered at the time of his commission. The applicant enlisted in the FLARNG on 21 August 2008. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army and state ARNG records of the individual concerned be corrected to show: * the 20 March 2010, a Written Agreement – OAB Addendum, was properly prepared with a Bonus Control...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005764

    Original file (20120005764.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He states personnel responsible for assigning a bonus control number did not do so, and the first lieutenant who was the officer in charge (OIC) did not sign his paperwork. In view of the foregoing, it would be appropriate to correct his record to show his Written Agreement – OAB Addendum was signed by a witnessing officer and assigned a bonus control number. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected to show his...