IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 3 May 2012
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120002944
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests to be paid his second $5,000.00 installment payment of his officer accession bonus (OAB).
2. The applicant states he was commissioned as a second lieutenant (2LT) in the Massachusetts Army National Guard (MAARNG) in May 2008 and was awarded a $10,000.00 OAB. He states the first $5,000.00 installment payment was made in January 2009 when he completed the basic officer leadership course with the second payment being due at the anniversary of his third year of service. When he did not receive his payment he submitted an inquiry through his unit S-1 and was informed that his payment had been denied because of a missing signature. He further states he submitted a request for an exception to policy (ETP) and his request was denied.
3. The applicant provides a copy of his request for an ETP.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. On 23 May 2008,he was commissioned as a military intelligence 2LT in the MAARNG. He also signed an OAB Agreement in which he agreed to serve in the Selected Reserve in a critical skill that is designated for bonus entitlement by the Secretary of the Army. The applicant's bonus agreement was not signed by a service representative or witnessing officer.
2. The applicant completed the Military Intelligence Officer Leadership Course on 17 December 2008 and he was awarded area of concentration (AOC) 35D. He was promoted to the rank of first lieutenant on 23 November 2009. He deployed to Afghanistan from 4 October 2010 to 17 July 2011.
3. Meanwhile, on 30 June 2011, he submitted a request for an ETP to receive his second installment payment of his OAB and was supported by his battalion commander who indicated the applicant had fulfilled his part of the contract and should not be penalized for the MAARNG's failure to notice the errors until after 3 years had elapsed. However, it appears his request was denied.
4. On 4 December 2011, officials at the National Guard Bureau (NGB) responded to a second review of the applicant's request for an ETP. Officials at NGB denied the applicant's request to retain his OAB and directed the State incentive manager to terminate his eligibility without recoupment. Officials at NGB also indicated the applicant's bonus control number had been obtained after he had signed the agreement and thus was not eligible to retain the incentive.
5. Title 37, U.S. Code, section 308j(b), states the Secretary concerned may pay an accession bonus under this section to an eligible person who enters into an agreement with the Secretary to: (a) accept an appointment as an officer in the Armed Forces and (b) to serve in the Selected Reserve of the Ready Reserve in a skill designated under paragraph (2) for a period specified in the agreement. Paragraph (2)(a) states the Secretary concerned shall designate for an Armed Force under the Secretary's jurisdiction the officer skills to which the authority under this subsection is to be applied. Paragraph (2)(b) states a skill may be designated for an Armed Force under paragraph (2)(a) if, to mitigate a current or projected significant shortage of personnel in that Armed Force who are qualified in that skill, it is critical to increase the number of persons accessed into that Armed Force who are qualified in that skill or are to be trained in that skill. Paragraph (2)(b) states an accession bonus payable to a person pursuant to an agreement under this section accrues on the date on which that agreement is accepted by the Secretary concerned.
6. National Guard Regulation 600-7 (Selected Reserve Incentive Programs), paragraph 2-5, provides that bonus contracts are valid only with bonus control numbers which will be issued from the State Incentive Management Office to Military Entrance Processing Station counselors and reported to NGB on a monthly basis. The State Incentive Manager will verify accession packets as prescribed by State policy for bonus control numbers, accuracy of enlistment contract and bonus addendum, critical skill and bonus unit eligibility, valid position vacancy, and required educational level.
7. NGB Selected Reserve Incentive Program (SRIP) Guidance for Fiscal Year (FY) 2007 (Policy Number 07-06 which was continued to FY08), dated 10 August 2007, paragraph 14, provides that in order to be eligible for receipt of either of two OAB's, applicants must sign their bonus addendums on the date they accept their appointments/commissions and meet the following eligibility requirements:
a. agree to serve as an officer for a period of not less than 6 years on active drilling status and meet all the required eligibility;
b. agree to serve in a critical skill AOC as defined by the ARNG;
c. not accept an appointment as an officer or warrant officer for the purpose of qualifying for employment in a military technician or Active Guard Reserve position; and
d. not be receiving and will not receive the following benefits during the period of service for which contracted: Health Professions Stipend Program, Education Loan Repayment Program, Other Educational Assistance Programs U.S. Marine Corps Platoon Leaders Class College Tuition Assistance Program, Reserve Officers' Training Corps (ROTC) Financial Assistance Program for Specially Selected Members, ROTC Financial Assistance Program for Specially Selected Members Army Reserve and ARNG, or Senior Health Care Professionals in Critically Short Wartime Specialties.
8. NGB SRIP Guidance for FY07 (Policy Number 07-06), dated 10 August 2007, paragraph 14p, also provides that the ARNG offers a $10,000.00 OAB to newly-commissioned officers and newly-appointed warrant officers who agree to serve 6 years in a modified table of organization and equipment (MTOE) unit in a valid AOC. The MTOE OAB will be paid in two 50-percent installments. The first
50-percent installment ($5,000.00) will be paid upon successful completion of an officer basic course (OBC) and the second and final 50-percent installment will be processed for payment on the third anniversary of commission or appointment.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. There is no doubt the applicant entered into an agreement for payment of an OAB. However, the agreement was determined to be an invalid agreement 3 years after the fact because it appears his agreement was not signed and witnessed by proper authorities at the time and his bonus control number was obtained after he signed his agreement.
2. The applicant attests he was informed that in return for his agreement to fulfill a 6-year commitment in the ARNG and by successfully completing the required training within 3 years of his appointment/commissioning date, he would be paid a $10,000.00 OAB.
3. The applicant was commissioned as a 2LT on 23 May 2008, completed his military intelligence OBC on 17 December 2008 and was paid $5,000.00 of his OAB in March 2009. However, in 2011 he was not paid the second $5,000.00 OAB payment because of the administrative irregularities discovered in his agreement.
4. Officials of both the MAARNG and NGB affirm the applicant's contention and acknowledge this error occurred as a result of an administrative oversight on the part of the MAARNG Incentive Office and was due to no fault of the applicant.
5. The MAARNG supported the applicant's request for an ETP and authorization for the remaining payment of the OAB, which was subsequently denied by NGB based upon the fact that the bonus control number was requested after the applicant signed his agreement.
6. The evidence shows the applicant fulfilled the requirements to qualify for payment of the bonus, did absolutely nothing wrong, and upheld his end of the bargain. Therefore, notwithstanding the denial by NGB, it would serve the interest of equity and justice to pay him the remainder of his OAB. It simply does not make sense to hold the applicant at fault for the administrative errors made in completing the addendum as a newly-commissioned 2LT when more experienced officers who were responsible for officer accessions failed to ensure that one was properly completed. This is especially true since he was paid his initial installment and the MAARNG waited 3 years to inform him that his contract was not valid for administrative reasons. If it took the MAARNG 3 years to discover that his contract/addendum was administratively flawed, it is not reasonable that a newly-commissioned 2LT would know what the procedures were on the date he was commissioned.
7. In short, the applicant has to date been penalized for relying on those officials responsible for recruiting officers. However, it is not appropriate for the applicant to suffer for the mistakes of more senior officials that were responsible for ensuring that all paperwork was done in a proper manner and it does not send the proper kind of message to a future leader or demonstrate that the Army takes care of its own and is responsible for its actions.
8. Accordingly, in the interest of justice and equity, the applicant should be paid his remaining OAB installment.
BOARD VOTE:
____x___ ____x___ ____x___ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The Board determined the evidence presented is sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:
a. showing he properly executed and signed a properly-prepared OAB Addendum on the date of his appointment/commissioning and is therefore fully entitled to payment of the bonus in accordance with the terms of his OAB Agreement and
b. having the Defense Finance and Accounting Service remit the remaining $5,000.00 payment to the individual concerned for the total amount of the $10,000.00 bonus, less applicable deductions, out of ARNG funds, as a result of this correction.
___________x______________
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20120002944
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20120002944
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022438
The applicant requests payment of the second $5,000.00 installment of his officer accession bonus (OAB). NGB denied the applicant's request to receive his OAB because the service representative and a witnessing officer failed to sign the addendum and advised the applicant to apply to this Board. As a result, the Board recommends that all State Army National Guard and Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing all parties concerned properly...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012848
IN THE CASE OF BOARD DATE: 24 April 2014 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20130012848 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. It simply does not make sense to hold the applicant at fault for the administrative errors made in completing the addendum as a newly-commissioned 2LT when more experienced officers who were responsible for officer accessions failed to ensure the Written Agreement OAB Addendum was properly completed. As a result, the Board recommends that all State Army National Guard and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013486
The applicant requests payment of his Officer Accession Bonus (OAB) of $10,000. His Written Agreement - OAB Addendum shows that he was being accessed into the ARNG in a critical skill area of concentration/military occupational specialty and was to receive a bonus of $10,000 paid in two 50 percent installments. Based on the above, his records should be corrected to show that he signed the Written Agreement - OAB Addendum on 22 May 2009, the date of his appointment, and is fully eligible to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130007052
The official also indicated there was no evidence the applicant executed a written agreement on the date of her appointment and a BCN had not been obtained until 2009. The advisory official recommended denial of the applicant's request for the second installment payment of the OAB. As a result, the Board recommends that the state Army National Guard records and the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing any recoupment action of the first...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001311
The applicant requests he be issued a manual bonus control number to be eligible to receive the first installment of his Officer Accession Bonus (OAB) in the amount of $10,000.00 in accordance with the terms of his enlistment in an authorized critical skill with the Missouri Army National Guard (MOARNG). The applicant provides: * MOARNG memorandum to the ABCMR, dated 5 January 2011 * DA Form 2823 (Sworn Statement) from Ms. Dxxxx x. Bxxxx * NGB memorandum reference Request for ETP, dated 9...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130001013
The available records do not contain a written agreement for an OAB. On 15 November 2012, the National Guard Bureau (NGB) disapproved the request for an ETP because the applicant failed to sign the OAB agreement. Since there is no evidence and the applicant did not provide any evidence of contracting for an OAB in the amount of $10,000.00, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120016808
His OAB Agreement shows: * he agreed to serve in AOC 15A which was a critical officer skill designated for bonus entitlement * a bonus control number was assigned to the OAB Agreement * the incentive manager (IM) failed to sign the OAB Agreement 3. National Guard Regulation 600-7 (Selected Reserve Incentive Programs), paragraph 2-5, states bonus contracts are valid only with bonus control numbers which will be issued from the State Incentive Management Office to Military Entrance Processing...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130007094
He was not eligible for any bonus other than an officer bonus that would have had have to been signed at the time of his appointment. Applicant should have never been eligible for this after his appointment date of 20 August 2005. h. a memorandum from Headquarters, CAARNG, dated 14 March 2013, Subject: Army Board for Corrections Appeal [the applicant], which stated: (1) that an Incentives Task Force audited the applicant and discovered the OAB addendum was completed after he was appointed...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003210
g. As his time for commissioning neared, the recruiter called him and said he was going to be boarded in either February or March 2009. h. He began to see internet chatter stating that his MOS was going to be taken off the critical area of concentration (AOC) list on 1 March 2009. i. The recruiter told him that whether he commissioned in February or March 2009, he would still be eligible for the OAB. r. He was told that the Army National Guard (ARNG) had lost his bonus agreement and unless...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004726
The applicant requests payment of a $10,000.00 officer accession bonus (OAB) for his appointment as a second lieutenant (2LT) in the Michigan Army National Guard (MIARNG). The evidence of record shows an OAB Addendum was executed for the applicant on or about the date he took the oaths of office on 19 December 2007 for an OAB of $10,000. As a result, the Board recommends that the State Army National Guard records and the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...