Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130000443
Original file (20130000443.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  23 July 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130000443 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests her periods of inactive service and annual training be added to her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty).

2.  The applicant states her DD Form 214 shows only her period of advance individual training (AIT) and not her monthly drills or two-week periods of annual training for six years.

3.  The applicant provides no supporting documentation.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) on 27 July 1987.  
3.  She entered initial active duty for training (IADT) on 28 June 1988, completed training, and was awarded the military occupational specialty 71L (Administrative Specialist).

4.  On 10 September 1988, she was released from active duty and returned to her USAR Troop Program Unit (TPU).

5.  The applicant was honorably discharged from the USAR Control Group (Annual Training) effective 30 October 1992, and from the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement) effective 1 August 1995. 

6.  The available records contain no evidence of any Federal active duty except her IADT.

7.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents that must be prepared for Soldiers on retirement, discharge, release from active duty service, or control of the Active Army.  It establishes standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214 and states that Reserve Component personnel will be issued a DD Form 214 for:

* 90 days or more of continuous active duty 
* IADT of less than 90 days that results in the award of a military occupational specialty
* Full-Time National Guard Duty (FTNGD)
* active duty for special work (ADSW)
* temporary tours of active duty (TTAD)
* Active Guard Reserve (AGR) service
* if mobilized to perform Federal service

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The only period of Federal service, that meets the requirements for inclusion on a DD Form 214, was the applicant's IADT. 

2.  While the applicant honorably served as a member of the USAR, her periods of inactive service and two-week annual training occurred after the creation of the 1988 DD Form 214.  Therefore, it would not be proper to add it to the existing DD Form 214.   

3.  The actions by the Army in this case were proper, and there is no doubt to be resolved in favor of the applicant.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X____  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _  X_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130000443





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130000443



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100008127

    Original file (20100008127.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Only the honorable characterization may be awarded a Soldier upon completion of his/her period of enlistment or period for which called or ordered to active duty or active duty for training, or where required under specific reason for separation, unless an entry-level status separation (uncharacterized) is warranted [emphasis added]. (2) The evidence shows the applicant had not completed 90 days of active service after beginning Phase II (AIT). Records show the applicant was honorably...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004386

    Original file (20120004386.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 17 November 1984 to show: * her rank as sergeant (SGT) at the time of separation from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) * she was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 95B (Military Police) and 97B (Counter Intelligence Agent) * she completed Drill Sergeant School * 179 days of active service with the 98th Division 2. She states her DD Form 214 is missing: *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001467

    Original file (20110001467.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    She further requests correction of item 35 (Record of Assignments) of her DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record - Part II), to include: a. These orders show she was discharged from the USAR under the provisions of Army Regulation 135-178 on 8 May 1987. The applicant also requested to add to item 35 of her DA Form 2-1 the dates she attended the scheduled UTAs, the 16 weeks she attended IADT, and the 3 days of ADT at Fort Gordon, GA. 7.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026132

    Original file (20100026132.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military personnel records do not contain a DD Form 220 (Active Duty Report) documenting the period of active duty from 13 May to 25 May 1985. There is no evidence the applicant was issued a DD Form 220 to document the period of active duty that is under review. Therefore, it would be appropriate to issue the applicant a DD Form 220 documenting the period of active duty from 13 May to 25 May 1985.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007403

    Original file (20120007403.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his uncharacterized discharge to show his character of service as honorable. He provides: * DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document – Armed Forces of the United States) * orders ordering him to initial active duty for training (IADT) * DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) * Certificate of Training * orders discharging him from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) * Honorable Discharge Certificate CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130022107

    Original file (20130022107.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was released from IADT on 25 August 1989 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel), chapter 4, by reason of completion of IADT with uncharacterized service. Personnel included are members of the Army National Guard and the USAR separated: a. for physical disability under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation), regardless of the period of time served on active duty; b. after...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020663

    Original file (20130020663.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) to show his active duty time while he was in boot camp (63 days), advanced individual training (AIT) (91 days), and to show "Honorable" discharge. An error was made to his active duty service orders when ordered to his initial active duty for training (IADT) which caused an incorrect entry of the net active duty time served on his DD Form 214. It...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100025582

    Original file (20100025582.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests his uncharacterized separation document be corrected to show his service was honorable. It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge. The applicant's DD Form 214 correctly shows his active duty service as uncharacterized; he was ordered to active duty to complete his initial entry training and was released to his Army Reserve unit upon successful completion of this training.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009726

    Original file (20120009726.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) and her National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) be "updated" to show all of her training and the exact dates of "tours." It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active duty service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge. A DD Form 214 is issued to Reserve component (RC) Soldiers who complete IADT with award of an MOS, complete 90...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012672

    Original file (20140012672.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of her records to show her character of service as honorable instead of entry level status. Although the evidence of record shows she subsequently completed the requested courses and received the requested promotion, awards, and character of service, her records are void of and she failed to provide any evidence showing she served 90 days or more of continuous...