Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130000428
Original file (20130000428.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:

		BOARD DATE:  23 July 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130000428 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his military records to allow him to transfer his education benefits to his daughter under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill.

2.  The applicant states he is entitled to receive the benefits under the Post-9/11 GI Bill.  When he retired on 1 August 2009, he was informed at his Army Career and Alumni Program (ACAP) briefing about the difference between Post-9/11 and Montgomery GI Bills.  He decided to go with the Post-9/11 GI Bill because it would allow him to transfer any unused benefits to his daughter.  He is in the process to trying to transfer 6 months of his benefits, but has been unable to do so.  He called the Department of Veterans Affairs and he was told the program changed around 1 August or 1 September 2009.  He was told he would have to obligate himself to another 4 or more years of military service that was not practical.  He was deployed to Iraq, and he was never informed of the change to the program.

3.  The applicant did not provide any supporting documentation.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 10 February 1988.  He attained the rank/grade of staff sergeant (SSG)/E-6.

2.  On 31 July 2009, he was voluntarily retired by reason of sufficient service for retirement. He completed 21 years, 5 months, and 21 days of creditable active service.

3.  On 10 July 2009, the Army released the Post-9/11 GI Bill Implementation Policy that identified and established responsibilities, eligibility criteria, benefits, and detailed guidance on the administration of the program.  The policy states that those who retire on or before 1 August 2009 are, by law, not eligible to transfer unused Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits because their last day of duty will be 31 July 2009 and they will transfer to the Retired List on 1 August 2009.

4.  Public Law 110-252 limits eligibility to transfer unused benefits to those members of the Armed Forces who are serving on active duty or as a member of the Selected Reserve of the U.S. Army on or after 1 August 2009.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant entered active duty on 10 February 1988 and he continued to serve until performing his last active duty service on 31 July 2009.  He was transferred to the Retired List on 1 August 2009.  The Post-9/11 GI Bill program was not in effect during his period of active military service.  The law states only those individual who served on active duty on or after 1 August 2009 are eligible to transfer education benefits under the provisions of the Post-9/11 GI Bill.

2.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ____X___  ___X__ _  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case 

are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _  X ______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110020816



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130000428



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010055

    Original file (20120010055.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    d. An official at the Army Education Services office informed him he could not transfer his educational benefits because he was retired and no longer eligible for the option. d. The advisory official states the applicant is not eligible to transfer benefits under the Post-9/11 GI Bill transferability program to his dependents because public law limits eligibility to transfer unused benefits to those members of the U.S. Armed Forces who were serving on active duty or as a member of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020596

    Original file (20100020596.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A VA Form 22-1990E, dated 22 December 2009, shows he applied for and transferred Post - 9/11 GI Bill benefits to his daughter for her to attend college. The official stated the applicant is not eligible to transfer benefits under the Post - 9/11 GI Bill transferability program because Army and Department of Defense (DOD) policy requires a Soldier to be on active duty or a member of the Selected Reserve in order to transfer benefits. The policy further states the Secretaries of the Military...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150002096

    Original file (20150002096.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he elected to transfer educational benefits to his daughter M____ under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill prior to his retirement. He stated HRC had evidence showing he designated his daughter M____ to receive the benefits. There is no evidence of record and he provided no evidence showing he attempted to revise his TEB to his dependents prior to leaving military service on 30 September 2014...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019248

    Original file (20140019248.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * he did not have the opportunity to choose to have his child use his Post 9/11 education benefits because he was separated from active duty in October 2006 * he was later separated from the Colorado Army National Guard (COARNG) on 21 July 2009 * both dates occurred prior to the activation of the Post 9/11 GI Bill transferability (August 2009); thus, he was unaware of the transfer rules * he can only use this benefit for himself but other Soldiers have a choice and he...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011763

    Original file (20140011763.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests an exception to policy to transfer unused education benefits to his dependents under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill. A service member is considered to be retirement eligible if he or she has completed 20 years of active duty or 20 qualifying years of Reserve service. Public Law 110-252, section 3020, limits eligibility to transfer unused benefits to those members of the Armed Forces who are serving on active duty or as a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016518

    Original file (20110016518.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states the Army Education Incentives Branch denied his request to transfer his Post 9/11 GI Bill education benefits to his daughter on 4 August 2011 because Department of Defense and Army policies require a Soldier to be on active duty or a member of the Selected Reserve in order to transfer benefits. A service member is considered to be retirement eligible if he or she has completed 20 years of active duty or 20 qualifying years of Reserve service; and d. for those...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008469

    Original file (20120008469.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The policy states, in part, that those who retire on or before 1 August 2009 are, by law, not eligible to transfer unused Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits because their last day of duty will be 31 July 2009 and they will transfer to the Retired List on 1 August 2009. The evidence of record shows he was honorably retired from the MAARNG on 20 June 2009 after completing more than 28 years of service. There is no evidence of record and he provided none to show he met all of the requirements...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008780

    Original file (20130008780.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests to transfer education benefits under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill to his daughter. A Soldier must have at least 6 years of eligible service in order to transfer educational benefits to a spouse and at least 10 years of eligible service to transfer benefits to eligible children. The available evidence shows the applicant was fully eligible to transfer benefits to his eligible dependents; however, based on his own...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002186

    Original file (20140002186.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his records to show his education benefits were transferred to his eligible dependent in accordance with the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill. A service member is considered to be retirement eligible if he or she has completed 20 years of active service or 20 qualifying years of Reserve service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130000399

    Original file (20130000399.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests to transfer her educational benefits to her daughter under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill. Those who retire on or before 1 August 2009 are, by law, not eligible to transfer unused Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits because their last day of duty will be 31 July 2009 and they will placed on the Retired List on 1 August 2009. In the applicant's case, she was not in an active status on 1 August 2009 and as such she was not eligible...