Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019248
Original file (20140019248.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:  	  

		BOARD DATE:  23 June 2015	  

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140019248 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests an exception to policy to transfer education benefits to his family member under the transfer of education benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill.

2.  The applicant states:

* he did not have the opportunity to choose to have his child use his Post 9/11 education benefits because he was separated from active duty in October 2006
* he was later separated from the Colorado Army National Guard (COARNG) on 21 July 2009 
* both dates occurred prior to the activation of the Post 9/11 GI Bill transferability (August 2009); thus, he was unaware of the transfer rules 
* he can only use this benefit for himself but other Soldiers have a choice and he wants the same choice
* he wants to use the benefits for his daughter; this would allow uniform standards to all those who served our country honorably 

3.  The applicant provides his 2006 DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) and orders transferring him to the Retired Reserve. 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's records show he was born in December 1954. 

3.  Having had prior service, he enlisted in the COARNG on 27 October 1988.  He served through multiple extensions in a variety of assignments and he attained the rank/grade of staff sergeant (SSG)/E-6. 

4.  He entered active duty on 6 July 2001 and he was honorably released from active duty on 27 October 2006. 

5.  On 30 January 2007, the COARNG issued him a Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay at Age 60 (20-Year Letter).  

6.  On 18 August 2009, COARNG published Orders 230-002 separating him from the ARNG and transferring him to the Retired Reserve effective 21 July 2009. 

7.  He was honorably discharged from the ARNG on 21 July 2009 and he was transferred to the Retired Reserve.  His NGB Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) shows he completed over 22 years and 9 months of service for pay. 

8.  On 16 January 2015, the U.S. Army Human Resources Command published orders placing him on the Retired List in his retired rank/grade of SSG/E-6 effective 21 December 2014, his 60th birthday. 

9.  Public Law 110-252 limits the eligibility to transfer unused benefits to those members of the Armed Forces who are serving on active duty or a member of the Selected Reserve.  

10.  On 22 June 2009, DOD established the criteria for eligibility and transfer of unused education benefits to eligible family members.  The policy states any member of the Armed Forces on or after 1 August 2009 who, at the time of the approval of the individual's request to transfer entitlement to educational assistance under this section, is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant served in the ARNG from 27 October 1988 to 21 July 2009 (with prior service).  The law requires a member to be on active duty or in the Selected Reserve on or after 1 August 2009 at the time he/she requests the transfer.  The applicant was transferred to the Retired Reserve on 21 July 2009, before the law became effective. 

2.  He was neither on active duty nor in the Selected Reserve at the time the Post 9-11 transferability program was implemented.  Therefore, he is not eligible to transfer his education benefits under the TEB provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill to his family members. The requirements of this program are set in the law and any changes to this law are not within the purview of this Board.  There is neither an error nor an injustice in his case and as such, he is not entitled to the requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ____X___  ____X___ DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   _X_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140019248



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140019248



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012457

    Original file (20130012457.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Public Law 110-552 established legal limitations on the transferability of unused Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits and limited eligibility to members of the Armed Forces who were serving on active duty or as a member of the Selected Reserve on or after 1 August 2009. A service member is considered to be retirement eligible if he or she has completed 20 years of active duty or 20 qualifying years of Reserve service. The policy states, in part, that those who retire on or before 1 August 2009 are,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017881

    Original file (20140017881.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests transfer of his educational benefits under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill to family members. The evidence of record shows the applicant was serving on active duty until his disability retirement on 26 January 2012. As he had over 10 years of active duty service, he would have been eligible to transfer any unused education benefits to his eligible family members through the TEB database.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009431

    Original file (20120009431.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that the Army National Guard (ARNG) did not properly inform him during the time of his retirement that he could transfer his education benefits to his dependents prior to his retirement from the ARNG. The advisory official stated the applicant was eligible for Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits; however, he did not complete a request to transfer benefit on the Department of Defense's (DOD's) TEB online database before he left the service. Contrary to the basis for the approval...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014094

    Original file (20140014094.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 17 July 2014, he was informed by Mr. T____ E____, VA Education Services, that the application for the TEB option should have been offered to him prior to separation from the service. However, this was the first time he learned there was a requirement to be approved for TEB prior to separation from the service and this option should have been offered to him upon his release from the NCARNG and at the time of retirement. He is asking that the Board correct his records to show he requested...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001421

    Original file (20140001421.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A Soldier must have at least 6 years of eligible service in order to transfer educational benefits to a spouse and at least 10 years of eligible service to transfer to eligible children. On 22 June 2009, DOD established the criteria for eligibility and transfer of unused educational benefits to eligible family members. The applicant was eligible to transfer his education benefits under the TEB prior to retirement, but there is no evidence he did so.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008469

    Original file (20120008469.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The policy states, in part, that those who retire on or before 1 August 2009 are, by law, not eligible to transfer unused Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits because their last day of duty will be 31 July 2009 and they will transfer to the Retired List on 1 August 2009. The evidence of record shows he was honorably retired from the MAARNG on 20 June 2009 after completing more than 28 years of service. There is no evidence of record and he provided none to show he met all of the requirements...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120012140

    Original file (20120012140.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Public Law 110-252 establishes legal requirements on the transferability of unused benefits to those members of the Armed Forces who are serving on active duty or as a member of the Selected Reserve on or after 1 August 2009. b. the ARNG, DOD, and the VA initiated a massive public campaign plan that generated major communications through military, public, and social media venues on the Post-9/11 GI Bill and subsequent transfer of education benefits. A service member is considered to be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009565

    Original file (20120009565.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant had 23 years of service upon his separation from the ARNG; furthermore, he was not eligible to transfer benefits to dependent because the law requires Soldiers to be on active duty or in the Selected Reserve on or after 1 August 2009. a. If the applicant had been in the Selected Reserve or on active duty on 1 August 2009, he would not have incurred an additional service obligation, but he was not eligible because he was not on active duty and left the ARNG prior to 1 August...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018354

    Original file (20140018354.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    It shows: * the applicant allocated 36 months of benefits to his spouse when he applied for TEB * the applicant reduced the total number of months his spouse could receive on 11 September 2014 * it was discovered the applicant did not fulfill the one year TEB service obligation requirement * review of the applicant’s record revealed his U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) service from 17 March 1989 to 26 September 1990 had to be included in his obligation requirement * his combined USAR and active duty...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009401

    Original file (20120009401.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, at the time of retirement, he was not informed his GI Bill educational benefits were non-transferable after retirement from the Army National Guard (ARNG). This law limits eligibility to transfer unused benefits to those members of the Armed Forces who are serving on active duty or as a member of the Selected Reserve on or after 1 August 2009. c. The ARNG, DoD, and VA initiated a massive public campaign plan that generated major communications through...