IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 18 July 2013
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120022949
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart.
2. The applicant states that during the Tet offensive in 1968 he suffered a shrapnel wound to his right leg. He was injured at the Widow's Village Massacre. At the time he did not think the wound was serious enough to merit a Purple Heart. A month after the injury the shrapnel "worked its way out." He is now being treated for post-traumatic stress disorder and part of the treatment is "recognition of his contribution."
3. The applicant did not provide any supporting documentation.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of
justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 31 August 1966 for a period of 3 years. He completed training and he was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 63C (Track Vehicle Mechanic).
3. The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he served in Vietnam from 23 September 1967 to 21 September 1968. Item 40 (Wounds) is blank and Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) does not list the Purple Heart as an authorized award.
4. The applicant was honorably released from active duty on 29 August 1969 at the expiration of his term of service in the rank/grade of specialist four (SP4)/E-4. He completed 2 years, 11 months, and 29 days of total active service. The
DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) he was issued at the time does not show award of the Purple Heart.
5. The applicant's medical records are not available for review.
6. Review of The Adjutant General's Office, Casualty Division's Vietnam casualty listing does not show the applicant's name as a casualty.
7. A review of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System (ADCARS), an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the U.S. Army Human Resources Command, failed to reveal any orders for the Purple Heart pertaining to the applicant.
8. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The Vietnam casualty listing does not contain the applicant's name.
2. There is no evidence of record and the applicant did not provide any evidence that shows he was wounded as a result of hostile action, that he was treated for such wound, or that it was made a matter of official record. There is no available evidence that shows he met the criteria for award of the Purple Heart.
3. Regrettably, in view of the foregoing, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
____X____ ___X_____ ____X_____ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case
are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
____________X___________
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20120022949
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017857
The applicant states: * he was combat wounded in Vietnam * during a firefight in the jungles of Vietnam he sustained shrapnel wounds in the left forearm and left side of his head 3. The Purple Heart requires evidence to verify: * the wound was the result of hostile action * treatment of the wound by medical personnel * documentation of the wound in official records 3. In the absence of corroborating evidence showing he was injured and treated for wounds as a result of hostile action in...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013275
The applicant's DA Form 20 shows he served in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) from 22 January 1968 to 5 October 1968, performing duties in MOS 94B and that during his RVN tour he was assigned to the 235th Aviation Company. Item 40 (Wounds) of the applicants DA Form 20 does not show that the applicant was wounded while he was assigned to the RVN. In the absence of such evidence, there is insufficient basis to grant award of the Purple Heart in this case.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016109
He departed Vietnam en-route to the United States on 10 February 1970. Although he provides evidence showing he was treated for a shrapnel wound to his buttock, there is no evidence in the available record, nor has the applicant provided any evidence showing he was wounded as a result of hostile action by enemy forces. _______ _ x _______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005987
The evidence of record does not support the applicant's request for award of the Purple Heart. The evidence of record shows the applicant sustained a fragment wound to his left leg during his service in the RVN and he provides his VA Rating Decision which shows he was granted a service-connected disability for a shrapnel wound to his right extremity. _______ _ _X______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110014689
The evidence of record shows the applicant was treated for a shrapnel wound while he was in Vietnam. Notwithstanding the applicant's sincerity, in the absence of official orders awarding him the Purple Heart or documentary evidence such as witness statements or morning reports that show he was wounded or injured as a result of enemy action, there is insufficient evidence upon which to correct his records to show award of the Purple Heart. _______ _ __x_____ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019762
The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart. In support of his request he provides a statement, dated 20 August 2011, from an individual who states he was a company medic who treated the applicant for a head wound during August or September 1968. _________X___________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009738
The applicant served in Vietnam from 25 November 1967 to 24 October 1968. He stated that as a medic in the Republic of Vietnam, he remembered the applicant being wounded by shrapnel. However, the combat medic, nor the applicant, provided evidence to show that this medical treatment was made a matter of official record.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070003558
Department of the Army Letter Orders, dated 7 September 1972, show that the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart for wounds received in action on 30 March 1969 in the Republic of Vietnam. Evidence of records shows that, on/about 11 July 1967, the applicant suffered metal shrapnel in his eyes in the Republic of Vietnam, while in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action and is therefore entitled to award of the Purple Heart and correction of his records to show this award. ...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012493
Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against and enemy or as a result of hostile action. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record. However, in the absence of orders or documentation that conclusively shows he was...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000389
The applicant contends, in effect, that his records should be corrected to show award of the Purple Heart because he was wounded in action in the spring of 1969 while serving in the RVN. However, he provides insufficient evidence in support of his claim for award of the Purple Heart. There is no evidence in the applicants military personnel records that show he was wounded as a result of hostile action; his DA Form 20 does not show an entry in item 40 or list the Purple Heart in item 41;...