Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022151
Original file (20120022151.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		
		BOARD DATE:	  22 August 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120022151 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of her mobilization reporting date.

2.  The applicant states she was fully qualified for mobilization under the provisions of Title 10, U.S. Code, section 12302, effective 1 February 2009.  However, her orders were published with a starting date of 16 February 2009, making her period of mobilization less than the year required to receive benefits.

3.  The applicant provides copies of:

* DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 10 February 2010
* DD Form 2813 (Department of Defense Active Duty/Reserve Forces Dental Examination), dated 13 November 2008
* Wisconsin Army National Guard (WIARNG) memorandum, dated 4 December 2008
* pathology laboratory results, dated 12 December 2008
* Medical Operational Data System (MODS) – Individual Medical Readiness Record, dated 12 December 2008
* MODS – Individual Immunization Summary Report, dated 12 December 2008
* DA Form 4700 (Medical Record – Supplemental Medical Data), dated 15 April 2009, Medical Evaluation Checklist
* DA Form 4700, dated 15 April 2009, Pregnancy Waiver for Immunizations
* DD Form 2766C (Vaccine Administration Record), dated 15 April 2009


* WIARNG Orders 029-226, dated 29 January 2009
* WIARNG Orders 043-322, dated 12 February 2009
* WIARNG Orders 043-458, dated 12 February 2009
* WIARNG Orders 068-219, dated 12 March 2009
* Headquarters, U.S. Army Garrison, Fort McCoy, Orders 018-1146, dated 18 January 2010
* WIARNG Orders 026-080, dated 2 February 2010
* WIARNG Orders 029-153, dated 5 February 2010
* WIARNG memorandum, dated 27 April 2010
* 829th Engineer Company (Vertical) memorandum, dated 22 December 2010
* 157th Maneuver Enhancement Brigade, WIARNG, memorandum, dated 19 October 2012
* Joint Force Headquarters Wisconsin memorandum, dated 5 November 2012

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  At the time of the application, the applicant was serving as a staff sergeant/
pay grade E-6 in the WIARNG.

2.  A memorandum from the WIARNG Deputy State Surgeon, dated 4 December 2008, states the applicant was evaluated for rheumatoid arthritis and was found to meet retention standards with no restrictions.

3.  The MODS – Individual Medical Readiness Record, dated 12 December 2008, states the applicant's hearing readiness status was a "no go."  On 16 December 2008, her hearing examination resulted in a "go."  On 15 April 2009, she had a "no go" for a hepatitis B vaccination.  She was administered the hepatitis B vaccine on 2 March and 15 April 2009.

4.  WIARNG Orders 029-226, dated 29 January 2009, ordered her to active duty for special work (ADSW) for the period 1 February to 3 March 2009.  WIARNG Orders 043-322, dated 12 February 2009, amended Orders 029-226 to shorten the ADSW period to 10 February 2009.

5.  WIARNG Orders 043-458, dated 12 February 2009, ordered her to active duty as a member of her Reserve Component unit in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom commencing on 16 February 2009 for a period not to exceed 385 days by authority of Title 10, U.S. Code, section 12302.

6.  Headquarters, U.S. Army Garrison, Fort McCoy, Orders 018-1146, dated 18 January 2010, released the applicant from active duty effective 10 February 2010.

7.  The applicant's DD Form 214 shows:

	a.  she was ordered to ADSW in support of 32d Infantry Bridge Combat Team (IBCT) pre-mobilization training from 1 to 15 February 2009; and

	b.  she was ordered to active duty in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom in accordance with Title 10, U.S. Code, section 12302, from 16 February 2009 to 10 February 2010;

8.  On 22 December 2010, the applicant requested amendment of WIARNG Orders 043-458 and her DD Form 214 through her chain of command to show she was mobilized under Title 10 effective 1 February 2009.

9.  On 19 October 2012, the applicant's WIARNG chain of command submitted a memorandum to the Army Review Boards Agency requesting amendment of her mobilization orders and associated DD Form 214 to reflect a starting date of 1 February 2009.

10.  On 5 November 2012, The Adjutant General (TAG), Wisconsin National Guard, submitted a memorandum to the Army Review Boards Agency requesting amendment of the applicant's orders to show she was mobilized with a starting date of 1 February 2009.  The WIARNG was notified on 1 February 2009 that the 32d IBCT mobilization date was changed from 21 February 2009 to 1 February 2009.  The applicant had met deployment standards effective 8 December 2008.  Her ADSW orders under Title 32, U.S. Code, section 502(f), should have been revoked and her mobilization orders under Title 10, U.S. Code, section 12302, should have been published effective 1 February 2009 based on the change in the unit's mobilization date.  The Adjutant General states he does not have the authority to amend the mobilization orders.  The error has affected the applicant's eligibility for educational benefits.

11.  In the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was obtained from the Chief, Personnel Policy Division, National Guard Bureau (NGB), dated 25 February 2013.  This opinion states the applicant had been erroneously identified as having medical and dental issues prior to deployment in 2009.

	a.  The necessary paperwork was provided to clear this issue and according to the DD Form 2813, dated 13 November 2008, and her individual medical record, dated 12 December 2008, she was identified as having met deployment standards.  However, her mobilization period did not begin until 16 February 2009.

	b.  Additionally, a memorandum from the WIARNG stated that a material error existed that prevented the applicant from entering Title 10 service on 1 February 2009 with the 829th Engineer Company.

	c.  The opinion recommended approval to change the applicant's mobilization orders to reflect a reporting date of 1 February 2009 and correction of her DD Form 214 to read "ORDERED TO ACTIVE DUTY IN SUPPORT OF OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM IAW 10 USC 12303 [IN ACCORDANCE WITH TITLE 10, U.S. CODE, SECTION 12302] FROM 20090201-20100210 [1 FEBRUARY 2009 TO 10 FEBRUARY 2010]."

12.  On 26 February 2013, a copy of the advisory opinion was sent to the applicant for her information and opportunity to respond.  No response was received.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that her mobilization orders under Title 10 should be corrected to show she was ordered to active duty effective 1 February 2009 because the incorrect starting date has affected her eligibility for educational benefits.

2.  The advisory opinion from NGB supported by the Wisconsin TAG clearly states the WIARNG was notified on 1 February 2009 that the 32d IBCT mobilization date was changed from 21 February 2009 to 1 February 2009.  Because the applicant had met all deployment standards prior to 1 February 2009, her Title 32 ADSW orders should have been revoked and her Title 10 mobilization orders should have been amended to show a starting date of 1 February 2009.

3.  Based on the available evidence, it would be in the best interests of all concerned to correct the applicant's Title 10 mobilization orders to show she was mobilized commencing 1 February 2009.  Furthermore, her DD Form 214 should be corrected accordingly.



BOARD VOTE:

___X__  ___X_____  ___X_____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined the evidence presented is sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all  Department of the Army and State Army National Guard records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

	a.  revoking WIARNG Orders 029-226, dated 29 January 2009;

	b.  amending WIARNG Orders 043-458, dated 12 February 2009, to show she was mobilized under Title 10, U.S. Code, section 12302, effective 1 February 2009;

	c.  deleting the remarks:  "ORDERED TO ACTIVE DUTY FOR SPECIAL WORK (ADSW) IN SUPPORT OF 32D IBCT PRE-MOB TRAINING FROM 20090201 TO 20090215 PER ORDER NUMBER 029-226 DTD 20090129; AMENDED BY ORDER NUMBER 043-332 DTD 20090212; ORDERED TO ACTIVE DUTY IN SUPPORT OF OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM IAW 10 USC 12302 FROM 20090216 TO 20100210" from her DD Form 214; and

	d.  adding the remark:  "ORDERED TO ACTIVE DUTY IN SUPPORT OF OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM IAW 10 USC 12302 FROM 20090201-20100210" to her DD Form 214.



__________X_______________
       CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120022151



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120022151



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020358

    Original file (20120020358.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests: a. her mobilization orders be amended to show her report date was 1 February 2009 instead of 16 February 2009; and b. item 18 (Remarks) of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 9 February 2010 be amended to show she was ordered to active duty in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom from 1 February 2009 to 9 February 2010. The applicant states: * she was qualified for Title 10, U.S. Code, section 12302 mobilization...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022118

    Original file (20120022118.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of her Wisconsin Army National Guard (WIARNG) mobilization orders to show she was mobilized on 10 February vice 16 February 2009. The applicant provides: * Request to correct mobilization date * Favorable recommendation memorandum of correction from her chain of command * State Adjutant General favorable recommendation memorandum * State policy memorandum regarding correction of Individual Title 10, USC, section 12302 Mobilization Order Report Date * DD...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004689

    Original file (20120004689.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states several Soldiers in her battalion who went through the same two weeks of training as she did had their active duty orders amended to read 1 February 2009, but for some reason Soldiers in her company did not did not receive amendments to their active duty orders. The applicant provides: * her DD Form 214 * an SRP database of readiness level with dates of 13 December 2008 and 24 January 2009 * Orders 035-035, dated 4 February 2009, issued by the WIARNG * Orders 043-476,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022967

    Original file (20120022967.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The advisory official recommended approval of the applicant's request to adjust her date of rank to LTC to 15 January 2010, based on NGB Policy Memorandum #04-0025, dated 1 September 2004. NGB Memorandum, subject: Clarification of the Policy to Promote DA Select Mobilized Officers at Maximum TIG (NGB-ARH Memorandum #04-0025), dated 1 September 2004, states in paragraph 3 that ARNG officers recommended for promotion to the grades of CPT through LTC under the provisions of Title 10, U.S....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087602C070212

    Original file (2003087602C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    In Section VI (Termination), she acknowledged that her entitlement to an affiliation bonus would be terminated should any of several conditions occur before completion of her statutory military service obligation including, in paragraph 3, "Fail to become MOS qualified within 12 months, if required to perform on-the-job training, or within 24 months if required to attend a service school, following reassignment to a duty position authorized an MOS for which I am not qualified or other than...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024664

    Original file (20100024664.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    DA PPG, in effect at the time of the applicant's mobilization, provided that RC Soldiers who voluntarily requested to serve beyond their 24-month mobilization authorized under the provisions of Title 10, U.S. Code could request an extension under the policy guidance for CO-ADOS. The evidence also shows she requested and was granted a voluntary extension of her mobilization in a CO-ADOS status which began on 22 July 2009 and resulted in her serving continuously in Iraq from 25 October 2008...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007442

    Original file (20090007442.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    She states, in effect, that her original Oath of Office and state appointment orders were voided and once the administrative error was corrected her appointment date was changed from 22 October 2008 to 26 February 2009 causing an adjustment to her date of rank, adjustment to her service creditable for retirement, and recoupment of the pay received for the period of 27 October 2008 to 25 February 2009. The evidence of record shows the applicant was discharged from active duty on 26 September...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020209

    Original file (20120020209.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 28 November 2006 to show: * award of the Army Reserve Components Achievement Medal, Joint Meritorious Unit Award, and the Humanitarian Service Medal * his current address * the dates of his service from his Individual Ready Reserve (IRR) call-up in 2009 and 2010 2. However, the DD Form 214 is a record of service at the time of release from active duty. As a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004564

    Original file (20110004564.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states she submitted a request for RSLSP on 13 November 2009 and was denied based on the 2010 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), enacted on 19 December 2009. The Supplemental Appropriations Act of 2009, Public Law 111-32, provided in §310: a. RSLSP Compensation to Eligible Claimants – In addition to the amounts appropriated or otherwise made available elsewhere in this Act, $534,400,000 is appropriated to the Department of Defense, to remain available for obligation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120018052

    Original file (20120018052.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show his character of service as "honorable" because he was ordered to active duty during the Berlin Crisis and he desires to use his veterans' benefits. It provides that a DD Form 214 will be prepared for each member of the Army National Guard released after completion of 90 or more days of active duty. Accordingly, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show the character of his service as "honorable."