Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087602C070212
Original file (2003087602C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved




RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


         IN THE CASE OF:
        

         BOARD DATE: 24 February 2004
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2003087602


         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mrs. Nancy L. Amos Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Raymond V. O'Connor Chairperson
Ms. Margaret V. Thompson Member
Mr. Lawrence Foster Member

         The applicant and counsel if any, did not appear before the Board.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1. The applicant requests that she be paid the second half of her affiliation bonus as an exception to policy.

2. The applicant states that, while on active duty serving in military occupational specialty (MOS) 95C (Corrections Noncommissioned Officer), she was under the impression that she had a security clearance. When she separated from active duty, she signed up with a military police unit with the Army National Guard (ARNG) and was granted an affiliation bonus. Although the unit had no positions for 95Cs, she was accepted for a 95B (Military Police) position. It was explained to her that she would be awarded MOS 95B after on-the-job training. She worked as a 95B immediately upon entry into the unit but was not asked to fill out a request for a security clearance until January 2000. She had to complete the paperwork three separate times, once because the paperwork was lost and once because additional information was needed.

3. The applicant provides a statement from the Wisconsin ARNG (WIARNG) Mobilization Plans Officer; her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty); active duty separation orders dated 1 May 1998 with an amendment dated 13 May 1998; a Headquarters, U. S. Army Field Artillery Center and Fort Sill memorandum dated 13 May 1998; a DA Form 5691-R (Request for Reserve Component Assignment Orders) dated 14 May 1998; a DD Form 4/1 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document Armed Forces of the United States) dated 14 May 1998; a DA Form 7249-R (Certificate and Acknowledgement of Service Requirements and Methods of Fulfillment for Individuals Enlisting or Transferring into Units of the Army National Guard upon REFRAD/Discharge from Active Army Service); a DA Form 5261-3-R-E (Selective Reserve Incentive Program – Affiliation Bonus Addendum); and a recruit eligibility printout.

4. The applicant also provides a diploma from the Corrections Specialist Course dated 10 November 1995; one page of a Standard Form 86 (United States of America Authorization for Release of Medical Information) dated 15 January 2000; a Primary Leadership Development Course (PLDC) certificate of completion and a PLDC DA Form 1059 (Academic Evaluation Report) dated 18 August 2001; a certificate of completion from the Military Police Investigator Course dated 25 July 2001; a memorandum from the National Guard Bureau (NBG) dated 18 December 2002; and a memorandum from the State of Wisconsin, Department of Military Affairs dated 17 January 2003.


CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1. The applicant enlisted in the Delayed Entry Program on 26 August 1994. She enlisted in the Regular Army on 13 July 1995. She completed basic training and advanced individual training and was awarded MOS 95C.

2. On 14 May 1998, the applicant enlisted in the ARNG for the remainder of her military obligation (4 years, 1 month, and 13 days) and voluntarily accepted assignment to the 32d Military Police (MP) Company of the ARNG in assignment MOS 95B. Her DA Form 5261-3-R-E indicated she was being assigned to a unit vacancy in the Selected Reserve which was authorized the grade and MOS she currently held or that service grade and MOS substitution rules applied.

3. The applicant would be paid an affiliation bonus. She would receive an initial payment of one-half of the bonus amount on completion of the DA Form 5261-3-R-E and assignment to the Selected Reserve unit. The remainder of the bonus would be paid on the sixth anniversary date of her military service obligation. In Section VI (Termination), she acknowledged that her entitlement to an affiliation bonus would be terminated should any of several conditions occur before completion of her statutory military service obligation including, in paragraph 3, "Fail to become MOS qualified within 12 months, if required to perform on-the-job training, or within 24 months if required to attend a service school, following reassignment to a duty position authorized an MOS for which I am not qualified or other than that for which I have herein contracted. This could result in a recoupment action as explained in section VII below."

4. She was released from active duty on 12 July 1998 in pay grade E-4 with a reserve obligation termination date of 25 August 2002.

5. The applicant completed the MP Investigator Course on 25 July 2001.

6. The WIARNG Mobilization Plans Officer stated that the applicant joined the 32d MP Company, WIARNG in July 1998 as a 95C. In accordance with her affiliation bonus contract, she had 12 months to become qualified in MOS 95B. Upon her entry into the 32d MP Company, the readiness noncommissioned officer (NCO) requested she be awarded MOS 95B. The request took 18 months for approval and at that time the readiness NCO was notified the applicant needed a confidential security clearance in order to be awarded the MOS. There was much confusion over the applicant's security clearance. She graduated from and was awarded the additional skill identifier for the Military Police Investigation course. That course requires a confidential (secret pending) security clearance. The applicant completed an application for a security clearance in 2000 but her clearance was delayed several times. She was granted an interim security clearance around August 2002.

7. [Corrected] WIARNG Orders 253-002 dated 10 September 2002 promoted the applicant to Sergeant, E-5 with a date of rank and effective date of 19 August 2001. These orders withdrew her primary MOS 95C10 and awarded her primary MOS 95B20 and secondary MOS 95C20.

8. On 18 December 2002, NGB disapproved a request to pay the applicant the second half of her affiliation bonus, citing Title 37, U. S. Code.

9. The applicant's normal expiration term of service (the expiration of her military reserve obligation date) was 25 August 2002. She is being retained in the service for the convenience of the Government as a result of STOP LOSS. As of 28 January 2004, she is still in the ARNG and is due to deploy soon.

10. Title 37, U. S. Code, section 308e provides that the Secretary concerned may pay a bonus for reserve affiliation to any person who is serving on active duty, has 180 days or less remaining of his active duty obligation, and upon discharge or release from active duty upon the completion of the active duty obligation will have a reserve service obligation. To be eligible to receive the affiliation bonus, a person must, in part, hold and be qualified in a military specialty designated for the purposes of this section. Section 308e shall be administered under regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Defense for the armed forces under the jurisdiction of the Secretary of Defense.

11. Department of the Army Pamphlet 621-1 (Military Occupational Classification and Structure), dated 31 March 1999, states that initial award of MOS 95B requires a security clearance of confidential and that formal training (completion of the MOS 95B course conducted under the auspices of the U. S. Army Military Police School) is mandatory. The regulation it superseded, Army Regulation 611-201 (same title), dated 26 June 1995, also required a security clearance of confidential and formal training for initial award of MOS 95B.

12. Department of the Army Pamphlet 621-1 states that initial award of MOS 95C requires, in part, that no information be in the individual's Provost Marshal Office, Intelligence Office, Military Personnel Record Jacket, or medical records that would prevent the granting of a security clearance.

13. Department of the Army Pamphlet 351-4 (U. S. Army Formal Schools Catalog) provides that Active Army or Reserve Component enlisted military police, holding primary MOS 95B, with certain qualifications, or MOS 95C, with certain qualifications, may attend the Military Police Investigator course. No security clearance is required.


DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1. There appears to be a clear case of an injustice and Government error in this case.

2. Even if the applicant was unaware of her security clearance status, the official who enlisted her in the ARNG should have verified her security clearance status before enlisting her for assignment in a unit requiring she hold MOS 95B, which in turn required she have at least a confidential clearance.

3. Once the applicant arrived in the 32d MP Company, the readiness NCO should have verified her security status prior to requesting she be awarded MOS 95B. Attendance (in 2001) at the Military Police Investigator course was not verification that she held a clearance since a clearance is not required to attend the course.

4. In addition, Government officials failed to take into account another factor affecting the applicant's ability to become qualified in MOS 95B. Formal school training is required. The government regulation does not make exceptions for soldiers currently holding MOS 95C. It appears the applicant was erroneously informed she could become 95B qualified through on-the-job training. It appears the applicant is still technically not qualified to hold MOS 95B.

5. Clearly, the above errors have created an injustice by preventing the applicant from becoming eligible to be paid the second half of her affiliation bonus. The errors occurred through no fault of the applicant and do not appear to have hurt her performance of 95B duties (albeit evidently unauthorized). She was recommended for award of 95B when she entered the unit. She was recommended for promotion in MOS 95B and was promoted to Sergeant, E-5 in MOS 95B in August 2001.

6. Title 37, U. S. Code, section 308e governs the payment of the Selected Reserve affiliation bonus. However, the only statutory requirement is that the individual hold and be qualified in a military specialty designated for the purposes of this section. Armed forces regulations actually administer section 308e.

7. The applicant's DA Form 5261-3-R-E, Section VI, paragraph 3 informed her that her entitlement to an affiliation bonus would be terminated if she failed to become MOS qualified within 12 months if required to perform on-the-job training or within 24 months if required to attend a service school following her assignment to the 32d MP Company.

8. The applicant's DA Form 5261-3-R-E, Section VI, paragraph 3 should be amended, as an exception to policy, to read, "Fail to become MOS qualified prior to the expiration of my statutory military service obligation (or prior to my separation, if involuntarily extended for the convenience of the Government) following reassignment to a duty position authorized MOS 95B. Successful on-the-job training as determined by the unit will satisfy the training requirement for award of MOS 95B as an exception to the formal training prerequisite required by Army Regulation 611-201."

BOARD VOTE:

__rvo___ __mvt___ __lf____ GRANT RELIEF

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending her DA Form 5261-3-R-E, Section VI, paragraph 3, as an exception to policy, to read, "Fail to become MOS qualified prior to the expiration of my statutory military service obligation (or prior to my separation, if involuntarily extended for the convenience of the Government) following reassignment to a duty position authorized MOS 95B. Successful on-the-job training as determined by the unit will satisfy the training requirement for award of MOS 95B as an exception to the formal training prerequisite required by Army Regulation 611-201."

2. That she be paid the second half of her affiliation bonus after the above correction is made.




                  __Raymond V. O'Connor_
                  CHAIRPERSON





INDEX

CASE ID AR2003087602
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 20040224
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION GRANT
REVIEW AUTHORITY Mr. Schneider
ISSUES 1. 128.05
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002871

    Original file (20140002871.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his military service records to show entitlement to a $20,000.00 Non-Prior Service Enlistment Bonus (NPSEB). Annex E to DD Form 4 (NPSEB Addendum - ARNGUS) shows the applicant enlisted into MOS 94T, a CS MOS, and he would receive an NPS CS bonus (50/50 payment). Records show the applicant enlisted for an NPSEB for CS MOS 94T in the amount of $20,000.00 on 5 August 2008. a.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040008110C070208

    Original file (20040008110C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests repayment of her student loans under the Student Loan Repayment Plan (SLRP) and payment of her enlistment bonus per her enlistment contract. The applicant states that after she enlisted, her bonus unit of assignment was deactivated and Soldiers were reassigned. Section III of the applicant's DA Form 5261-4-R (Student Loan Repayment Program Addendum) shows she contracted for assignment to the 8th Legal Support Organization, Team 3, Wichita, KS to serve in MOS 71D...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001724

    Original file (20090001724.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show: a. an increase in her rank and pay grade from private first class (PFC)/pay grade E-3 to an unspecified rank and pay grade; b. the time period during which she was mobilized and served on active duty in support of Operation Desert Storm; c. her social security account...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008781

    Original file (20080008781.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Notwithstanding the above, she apparently completed the training course in MOS 95B and she is entitled to have this training entered in Item 14 of her DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. adding "Military Police Course, 10 weeks" in Item 14 of the applicant's DD Form 214; and b. awarding the applicant the Army Service Ribbon and showing this award on her DD Form 214. The Board further...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019356

    Original file (20100019356.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The GAARNG letter clearly shows the applicant did not receive his promised bonus due to a recruiter error. Nevertheless, his records show he submitted an application for a clearance on 24 January 2007 and received a validation report of his submission. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army and State Army National Guard records of the individual concerned be corrected to show he: a. received a valid bonus control number upon enlistment in the GAARNG for the AB in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130014110

    Original file (20130014110.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of her military service records to show entitlement to a $10,000.00 Non-Prior Service Enlistment Bonus (NPSEB). Records show the applicant was processed for enlistment in the ARNGUS and DEARNG on 12 August 2009 for training in MOS 88M and a DD Form 4 was completed on that date. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army and Army National Guard records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing she was granted an...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008452

    Original file (20130008452.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant contends his records should be corrected to show entitlement to a $20,000.00 NPSEB because an additional requirement for a security clearance resulted in the withdrawal of his critical skill PMOS 42A; however, he was reclassified into another critical skill bonus MOS (PMOS 92A). Records show the applicant enlisted for an NPSEB for critical skill MOS 42A in the amount of $20,000.00. As a result of this correction, the Defense Finance and Accounting Service shall be notified of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012462

    Original file (20110012462.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In connection with her intent, she executed a Contingent Enlistment Addendum on 22 September 1993 wherein she acknowledged: Various Army enlistment incentives, such as enlistment bonuses must be approved by Congress. The authorization for enlistment bonuses expires on 30 September 1993. The "Remarks" block of her DA Form 7249 (Certificate and Acknowledgement of Service Requirements and Methods of Fulfillment for Individuals Enlisting or Transferring into Troop Program Unit (TPU) of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9605309C070209

    Original file (9605309C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: That her records be corrected to show that she executed a Student Loan Repayment Program (SLRP) addendum to her enlistment contract which was properly validated by her recruiter and that her student loans be paid for in accordance with the terms of that addendum. EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show: She enlisted in the Army Reserve (USAR) on 19 August 1986 for 6 years in pay grade E-3. The applicant was never completed a properly countersigned SLRP...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020484

    Original file (20110020484.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This document shows that de facto status was approved for his promotion to SFC/E-7 in the MOS of 95B for the period 1 August 2009 through 12 July 2010. On 10 May 2011, the applicant was given a GOMOR which shows an investigation determined that he: a. knowingly accepted award of the PMOS 31B and promotion to SFC in July 2009 for which he was not qualified; b. made a false official statement on his June 2009 security clearance application by stating that he had not been subject to any...