Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022112
Original file (20120022112.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	    13 August 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120022112 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests he be authorized to receive payment under the Student Loan Repayment Program (SLRP).

2.  The applicant states at the time he accepted his commission a term of that contract was the payment of his student loans under the SLRP.  His contract clearly shows the SLRP as a term for his acceptance of his commission.  He was told that after a year, repayment of his student loans would commence.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of the documents prepared at the time of his commissioning, including but not limited to his student loan documentation; computer printouts of his commissioning application, a DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document); a DD Form 1966 (Record of Military Processing); an Army National Guard (ARNG) Enlistment/Reenlistment Agreement, dated 24 January 2009; a 12 April 2012 National Guard Bureau (NGB) Exception to Policy Memorandum denial; a 2 May 2012 Texas Army National Guard (ARNG) notice of SLRP eligibility termination; and his post-commissioning service documents.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant completed his enlistment application packet (for Officer Candidate School) on 24 January 2009.  Included in that packet is the documentation of his student loans, a DD Form 4, an ARNG Enlistment Agreement, and a DD Form 1966.  

2.  The printouts of the applicant's student loans, dated 22 January 2009, show the applicant had loans to Sallie May in the amount of $8,234.22 and Stafford Loans in the amount of $7,142.23.

3.  On page 8 of the ARNG Enlistment Agreement, the list of addendums attached is shown as the Montgomery GI and Montgomery GI Bill Kicker.  Below the list of addendums is the preprinted statement "I have read and understand the statements above and that these statements are intended to constitute ALL promises and guarantees whatsoever concerning my enlistment.  No other (verbal or otherwise) promise or representation not annexed to my enlistment contract is valid or will be honored.  I hereby state that I have NOT been promised anything other than what is written on this form and hereby waive any claim based upon any promise or representation not annexed to my contract."

4.  Page 4 on the DD Form 1966 contains the preprinted statement "I understand that I am eligible for the student loan repayment program.  I accept the student loan repayment program."  It is initialed by the applicant and dated 24 January 2009.

5.  The applicant was ordered to initial active duty for training (IADT) on 1 June 2009.  He completed Officer Candidate School, was released from active duty on 
18 November 2009, and was commissioned a second lieutenant in the Texas ARNG on 19 November 2009.

6.  He served on active duty for training as a basic aviation officer from 23 January 2011 through 14 June 2012. 

7.  As a result of an undocumented audit of his records, the applicant was notified that he did not qualify for participation in the SLRP and an exception to policy was requested because he had enlisted for the Montgomery GI Bill programs.

8.  On 26 April 2012, the NGB denied the request for an exception to policy stating the applicant did not sign an SLRP statement, no Bonus Control Number was issued, and there was no evidence to support that a SLRP incentive was offered at the time of his commission.  The denial memorandum incorrectly shows a date of commission of 24 January 2008.

9.  Army Regulation 135-7 (Incentive Programs) prescribes policies and procedures for the administration of ARNG and the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) incentive programs.  For eligibility under the SLRP a non-prior service applicant must: 

* enlist with a high school diploma
* enlist for a term of service of not less than 6 years
* have an Armed Forces qualification test score of 50, or higher on the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery (ASVAB) 
* decline enrollment in the Montgomery GI Bill in writing, using DD Form 2366 
* have SLRP guaranteed in writing in the enlistment contract (DA Form 3286-66)
* possess a loan that was made, insured, or guaranteed under the higher education act of 1965, Title IV, Part B, D, or E prior to entering active duty

10.  A Soldier will not be eligible for any loan repayments until they have: 

* completed IADT
* have received sufficient training to be deployed
* have served 1 year in the Selected Reserve after securing the loan or loans
* have reached the anniversary date of the Selected Reserve contract for SLRP participation.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  In accordance with law and regulation, the NGB denial of the exception to policy is correct.  Payment under the SLRP is not authorized without the addendum showing an SLRP election having been made with the issuance of a Bonus Control Number.  

2.  However, the NGB denial memorandum is flawed.  It contains an erroneous date of commissioning; the applicant was commissioned in 2009 not 2008.  This fact would normally be considered nothing more than a typographical error if not for the fact that decision also states that there is no evidence that the SLRP was offered as a part of applicant's commissioning contract.  There is an entry on the DD Form 1966/4 showing election of SLRP and the submission of the documents showing his student loans as a part of his application for commissioning.  

3.  Further, the memorandum does not address the fact that addendums that are of record relate to participation in the Montgomery GI Bill and that a Soldier is not permitted to participate in both the Montgomery GI Bill and the SLRP.  The inclusion of both options in his enlistment documents shows he was not properly counseled on the options.

4.  Attempts were made to contact the applicant, via the phone number and e-mail address shown on his application, to determine which option, the Montgomery GI Bill and Kicker or the SLRP, he would prefer.  The phone number was reported as either changed, invalid, or no longer connected and the e-mail was returned as invalid.  Therefore, this case should be resolved based on the applicant's request as stated.

5.  The applicant's records should be corrected to show an addendum showing an election of SLRP participation was completed at the time of enlistment and that he was issued a Bonus Control Number.

6.  Further, he should be shown to have declined participation in the Montgomery GI Bill, and have reimbursed to the applicant any monies withheld or paid into the Montgomery GI Bill program and paying the appropriate amounts under the SLRP. 

BOARD VOTE:

___X____  __X_____  ___X____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all State ARNG and Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

	a.  showing the applicant elected participation in the SLRP;

	b.  showing an SLRP addendum was properly completed and submitted at the time of enlistment and that he was issued a Bonus Control Number; 

	c.  showing he declined participation in the Montgomery GI Bill; 

	

   d.  refunding him any monies withheld or paid into the Montgomery GI Bill program; 

	e.  paying the appropriate amounts under the SLRP out of ARNG funds. 



      ___________X____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120022112





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120022112



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015211

    Original file (20140015211.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, he enlisted in the Delaware Army National Guard (DEARNG) on 10 December 2008 and that Section VI (Remarks) of his DD Form 1966 (Record of Military Processing - Armed Forces of the United States) reflects his acceptance of both the Non-Prior Service Enlistment Bonus (NPSEB) and the SLRP in conjunction with his enlistment. He attests that although SLRP documents were completed at the time of his enlistment and bonus control numbers were requested, they were...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014774

    Original file (20140014774.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His SLRP contract stated he would be able to add new loans any time during the contracted period up to the fifth anniversary of the current 6-year contract, not to exceed $50,000.00. The applicant provides: * two self-authored statements * U.S. Army Cadet Command Form 203-R (Guaranteed Reserve Forces Duty Scholarship Cadet Contract Endorsement) * DA Form 4836 (Oath of Extension of Enlistment or Reenlistment), dated 27 July 2010 * NGB Form 600-7-5-R-E (ELRP Addendum), dated 27 July 2010 * DA...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003314

    Original file (20140003314.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A DA Form 2823, dated 3 November 2012, shows he stated – * he was promised the SLRP when he enlisted * through no fault of his own, the SLRP contract could not be located * he was never given a copy of the SLRP Addendum * the SLRP contract had a bonus control number (BCN) and had been established in the Guard Incentive Management System (GIMS) * he had kept all contractual obligations and was requesting an ETP b. It states applicants enlisting for incentives under the SRIP, including the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120015144

    Original file (20120015144.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He provides: * a DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document – Armed Forces of the United States) * a Guard Annex – Enlistment/Reenlistment Agreement – ARNG * NGB Form 600-7-5-R-E (Annex L to DD Form 4 – Enlisted Loan Repayment Program (ELRP) Addendum) * a DA Form 5435 (The Selected Reserve Montgomery GI Bill) * a DD Form 1966/1-4 (Record of Military Processing – Armed Forces of the United States) * a request for exception to policy/with response * a records correction...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150006804

    Original file (20150006804.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of her record to show she is eligible for the Student Loan Repayment Program (SLRP). She further stated the applicant: * did not contract the incentive at the time of enlistment * incentive addendum was signed after the enlistment document * bonus control number was requested after the date of enlistment * date of agreement was 26 August 2010 * contracted loan addendum/agreement amount was $50,000.00 * contracted and current MOS is 91B 6. The applicant...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013881

    Original file (20140013881.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her record to show she is eligible for the Student Loan Repayment Program (SLRP). Based on the evidence, it appears she never signed an SLRP contract and the first documented evidence of any mention of the SLRP came from the MDARNG IM on 20 April 2011, when she requested that the applicant provide her SLRP Addendum, a promissory note from her Loan Company, NSLDS` Summary Sheet, and loan detail sheets. The evidence of record shows that on 20 July 2010...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000874

    Original file (20140000874.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's records show she enlisted in the VAARNG under the RFP enlistment option for 1 year on 10 August 2009. Applicants who are eligible for enlistment but cannot ship to their initial active duty for training (IADT) for more than 120 days after becoming eligible to enlist in the ARNG will contract in the Inactive National Guard (ING) and are assigned to the RFP of the Recruiting and Retention Command. She returned to the MEPS again on 2 June 2010 and she executed two Addenda: The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008166

    Original file (20140008166.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In connection with this enlistment, she signed a DD Form 1966 (Record of Military Processing), Annex L (SLRP Addendum), and Annex E (Non-Prior Service Enlistment Bonus Addendum). Annex L was signed by the applicant and an enlisting official on the same date and is assigned SLRP Bonus Control Number (BCN) S09XXXXXXSC. An NGB official stated the applicant signed an obsolete addendum on the date of enlistment and received payments on qualifying loans but the enlistment document does not...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002713

    Original file (20130002713.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show entitlement to a Student Loan Repayment Program (SLRP) incentive for his enlistment on 20 November 2011. He stated: a. the applicant had qualifying loans and was eligible for the SLRP incentive upon enlistment; b. there is no documentation of a request for a Bonus Control Number or that the incentive was offered at the time of enlistment; c. the applicant enlisted under ARNG SRIP Policy for Fiscal Year 11 (P11-0009) under which...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008586

    Original file (20130008586.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    e. a DA From 5435, dated 15 April 2009, which shows he was eligible for the Selected Reserve MGIB program provided he contracted to serve for 6 years, was a secondary school graduate, and completed individual active duty training. d. The advisory recommended he be granted full administrate relief and that repayment of eligible loans active at his time of enlistment be honored under his contract according to Department of the Army SLRP regulatory guidance. As a result, the Board recommends...