Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021867
Original file (20120021867.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  22 August 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120021867 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his initial Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) election to reflect option B as opposed to the default option C.

2.  The applicant states he elected option B for his RCSBP in June 2012.  The applicant states he reached his 20 years in 2005, before he was married and never filed a DD Form 2656-5 (Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) Election Certificate) to make an election.  The applicant states he married on 31 December 2007.  

3.  The applicant states he did not receive proper counseling by his unit administrator and there were no certified retirement specialists counseling Soldiers in June 2008.  The applicant states that he recently found out in June 2012 that he had 1 year from that date of his marriage to change his RCSBP election.  The applicant continues that he immediately submitted a DD Form 2656-5 along with his marriage license to the U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC).  His application was returned without action because he did not submit his marriage license prior to 1 year after his marriage.

4.  The applicant provides:

* DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty)
* An HRC Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay at Age 60, dated 7 April 2005 
* Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Marriage Record, dated 7 January 2008 
* DD Form 2656-5, dated 14 June 2012
* An HRC letter, dated 26 June 2012
* U.S. Army Reserve Command Order 12-228-00004, dated 15 August 2012

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant's records show that he was born on 30 January 1966.  He had prior active duty service.  On 20 May 1988, the applicant was appointed as a Reserve commissioned officer in the grade of second lieutenant (2LT). 

2.  On 7 April 2005, HRC issued the applicant a Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay at Age 60 (20-Year Letter).  This letter notified the applicant that he had completed the required years of service and would be eligible for retired pay upon application at age 60.  This letter also notified the applicant that he was entitled to participate in the RCSBP and that by law, he had only 90 calendar days from the date he received this letter to submit his SBP Election Certificate.  If he did not submit his election within 90 days, he would not be entitled to survivor benefit coverage until he applies for retired pay at age 60.

3.  There is no indication in the applicant's records that he elected to participate in the RCSBP during his 90-day window of opportunity in 2005.  Further, it appears he had no dependents at the time.

4.  On 31 December 2007, the applicant married.

5.  There is no indication the applicant requested to enroll his new spouse for RCSBP coverage within 1 year of his marriage.

6.  On 14 June 2012, the applicant completed a DD Form 2656-5.  He indicated that he was married and further elected "spouse only" coverage, full amount, option B (Age 60).  

7.  On 26 June 2012, HRC returned the applicant's application without action due to not submitting his request within 1 year of his marriage.  

8.  On 15 September 2012, the applicant was transferred to the Retired Reserve at the rank of major (MAJ).

9.  Public Law 95-397, enacted 30 September 1978, provided a way for Reserve Component (RC) members who qualified for Reserve retirement, but were not yet age 60 and eligible to participate in the SBP, to provide an annuity for their survivors should they die before reaching age 60.  Three options were available:  
* Option A - elect to decline enrollment and choose at age 60 whether to start SBP participation
* Option B - elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity if they die before age 60, but delay payment of it until the date of the member's 60th birthday
* Option C - elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity immediately upon their death if before age 60

10.  Title 10, U. S. Code, section 1448(a)(5) provides that a person who is not married and has no dependent child upon becoming eligible to participate in the SBP but who later marries or acquires a dependent child may elect to participate in the SBP.  Such an election must be written, signed by the person making the election, and received by the Secretary concerned within 1 year after the date on which that person marries or acquires that dependent child.  

11.  Periodically Congress passes laws that establish open enrollment seasons which allow SBP enrollment or changes.  Public Law 108-375, enacted 28 October 2004, established an open enrollment season from 1 October 
2005 through 30 September 2006.  Open enrollment seasons are extensively publicized in Army Echoes to ensure all retirees are informed of their existence.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Evidence of record shows he was issued his 20-year letter on 7 April 2005.  He married on 31 December 2007.  On 26 June 2012, the applicant's request to enroll in the RCSBP was returned without action because he did not submit his application within 1 year of marriage.  The applicant states his unit administrator did not properly counsel him and there were no certified retirement counselors from 2008 to 2011. 

2.  It was the applicant's responsibility to enroll his spouse in the RCSBP.  Further, it was not the unit administrator's responsibility to lay out possible future contingencies and options based on these contingencies.  The applicant knew his family situation had changed, yet he waited 5 years before attempting to enroll in the RCSBP. 

3.  There is insufficient evidence to demonstrate the existence of an error or an injustice.  While the applicant's circumstance is regrettable, he has not provided evidence that he exercised due diligence regarding RCSBP coverage for his spouse.  Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, there is no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application.

4.  The applicant is urged to carefully read Army Echoes, the Army bulletin periodically sent to all retirees to keep them abreast of issues concerning them.  The applicant will have the opportunity to elect to participate in the RCSBP if Congress declares an Open Season.  Such Open Seasons are highly publicized in Army Echoes.  He will also have an opportunity to enroll in the standard SBP upon reaching age 60 and applying for retirement pay. 

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ___X_____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   _X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120021867



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120021867



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015598

    Original file (20130015598.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A DD Form 2656-9 (SBP and RCSBP Open Enrollment Election), dated 25 January 2006, shows he elected spouse-only coverage. He provided a letter from DFAS, dated 12 July 2013, which states: * their records indicate he elected RCSBP child coverage on his DD Form 1883 on 7 February 1988 * at that time he was not married * on his original DD Form 2656 he elected SBP for his spouse and he indicated his marriage occurred on 19 May 1989 * there is a 1-year window of eligibility * notification, along...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100006903

    Original file (20100006903.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his military records be changed to show he elected spouse and children coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). On 27 February 2009, the applicant completed a DD Form 2656-6 and indicated that he was married and elected spouse and children SBP coverage based on the full gross pay without supplemental SBP. A DD Form 2656-5 shows that 14 September 2006 the applicant elected children only SBP coverage under Option C. He did not have a spouse at the time.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070006453

    Original file (20070006453.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that upon retirement from the Utah Army National Guard (UTARNG), he was unmarried and thus elected the children only coverage of the Reserve Component SBP. This application was dated 2 March 2007 by the applicant and received by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) on 27 April 2007. On 20 December 2005, HRC emailed DFAS (responding to HRC's email dated 14 November 2005) and asked "If the FSM elects to cover spouse during the open...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024346

    Original file (20100024346.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence of record shows the applicant executed an SBP Election Certificate on 18 August 1994 electing immediate coverage under option C for children-only coverage upon receipt of his 20-year letter. At that time, his election would have been sent to HRC because DFAS had not yet established a retired pay account as he was still under the age of 60. In this case, the applicant and his spouse were married on 30 August 1996.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005872

    Original file (20090005872.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Pursuant to Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1448(a)(5), a retired member who marries after retirement and who, at the time of marriage, has no dependent children and has not previously elected for spouse coverage may, within one year of the marriage, elect to cover his spouse under the SBP. The applicant contends that his records should be corrected to show he elected to participate in the RCSBP with immediate spouse coverage because he was never made aware of the fact that he had to enroll...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020844

    Original file (20120020844.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests enrollment in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) for "spouse and child" coverage, Option C. 2. His record contains a transaction history which shows he received a 20-year letter on 19 October 2000 but did not make an RCSBP election, then he got married on 24 June 2004 but did not make an RCSBP election within the one year anniversary date. The evidence of record shows that upon receiving his 20-year letter on 19 October 2000, the applicant did not...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070011867

    Original file (20070011867.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay at Age 60, dated 10 April 1995, which shows the applicant met the requirements for retired pay at age 60; c. a copy of DD Form 1883 (Survivor Benefit Plan Election Certificate), dated 11 May 1995; d. a copy of Orders Number 306-083, dated 2 November 1995, published by the Alabama Army National Guard (ARNG) which shows that the applicant was discharged from the ARNG, effective 1 November 1995, then transferred to the Retired Reserve; e. a copy of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003739

    Original file (20150003739.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * he was transferred to the Retired Reserve in September 1999 but he was not married at the time; he requested Reserve Component SBP (RCSBP) for his child who was a minor * he married his spouse in January 2005; shortly thereafter, they went to Fort Buchanan PR to obtain an ID card * they provided a copy of their marriage certificate, updated the Defense Eligibility Enrollment Reporting System (DEERS) and they were told the SBP was taken care of; they left Fort Buchanan...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004269

    Original file (20130004269.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides copies: * DD Form 2656-6, dated 19 February 2013 * a State of Colorado Marriage License and Marriage Certificate CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. All of these open enrollment seasons were extensively publicized in Army Echoes to ensure all retirees were informed of their existence and also in the Army Times. He was authorized up to 1 year from the date of marriage to enroll his spouse and stepchildren in the RCSBP.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013913

    Original file (20100013913.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 23 September 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100013913 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. In connection with his application, the FSM completed a DD Form 2656-6 and indicated he was married to the applicant and elected "spouse only" SBP coverage based on the full gross pay without supplemental SBP. The evidence of record shows that upon receipt of his 20-year letter, the FSM executed a DD Form 1883 on 20 July 1989, electing "children only" coverage under option B.