IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 9 September 2009
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090005872
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests that his records be corrected to show he elected to participate in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) with immediate spouse coverage.
2. The applicant states, in effect, he was never made aware of the fact that he had to enroll his spouse in the RCSBP within 1 year after their marriage in order for her to be covered by the RCSBP. He also states he was led to believe that if he updated the Dependent Enrollment Eligibility Reporting System (DEERS) his spouse would be covered. The applicant adds he was no longer actively drilling and he was not married when he completed 20 years of service, his request to enroll his spouse in the RCSBP was recently disapproved, and he was told he would have to wait until age 60 before he can enroll her in the plan.
He concludes by stating he understands that if he had been actively drilling at the time of his marriage, his spouse would have been automatically covered by the RCSBP.
3. The applicant provides, in support of his application, a DD Form 2656-6 (Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) Election Change Certificate); Certificate of Marriage; and Headquarters, U.S. Army Human Resources Command (USA HRC), St. Louis, Missouri, letter, dated 11 March 2009.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant enlisted in the Army National Guard (ARNG) on 20 August 1980. His date of birth is 7 December 1960. He was ordered to active duty for training and awarded military occupational specialty 11B (Infantryman).
2. Headquarters, Iowa National Guard, Office of the Adjutant General, Johnston, Iowa, memorandum, dated 18 September 2000, notified the applicant that, having completed the required years of service, he will be eligible for retired pay upon application at age 60 in accordance with the provisions of Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1223. This document also shows that attached as enclosures were, in pertinent part, NGB Form 23A (Army National Guard Current Annual Statement) and a Survivor Benefit Plan Summary. His DD Form 1883 (Survivor Benefit Plan Election Certificate) shows he elected to participate in the RCSBP for children only coverage, option C, full base amount. It also indicated he was not married.
3. Headquarters, Iowa National Guard, Office of the Adjutant General, Johnston, Iowa, memorandum, dated 9 March 2001, informed the applicant that the Qualitative Retention Board met and the Adjutant General approved the applicant's continued retention in the ARNG.
4. The applicant's NGB Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) shows he enlisted in the Iowa ARNG on 20 August 1980, was honorably discharged on 30 September 2002, and transferred to the U.S. Army Control Group (Retired Reserve) effective 1 October 2002. At the time he had completed 22 years, 1 month, and 11 days of net service this period and total service for retired pay. Item 18 (Remarks), in pertinent part, shows the applicant was issued his "20-Year" letter on 18 September 2000 and that he elected SBP Option "C."
5. In support of his application, the applicant provides the following documents.
a. A copy of his State of Iowa, County Record, Certificate of Marriage, that shows he married Sandra Jean B______ V____ on 6 August 2005.
b. Survivor Benefit Plan Election and Change Certificate, dated 22 February 2008, that shows the applicant indicated his current SBP coverage is "child only"; based on remarriage he requested to resume the existing level of coverage for his new spouse; he requested "spouse only" coverage; and elected a level of coverage based on full retired pay. This document also shows the applicant indicated he married Sandra J. S____ on 6 August 2005.
c. Headquarters, USA HRC, Transition and Separations Branch, St. Louis, Missouri, letter, dated 11 March 2009, advised the applicant that his request for enrollment in the RCSBP was being returned without action because he should have requested coverage before the first anniversary of his marriage.
6. The applicant's military personnel records do not contain any documents related to his enrollment in the RCSBP or a request for change to his RCSBP.
7. There is no evidence in the applicant's military personnel records that shows he took any action to notify the USA HRC requesting a change to the category of his SBP election to spouse coverage within 1 year of his marriage, as is required by law.
8. In connection with the processing of this case, the Military Pay Operations - Cleveland, DFAS, Cleveland, Ohio, was asked to verify the status of the applicant's SBP. A DFAS official confirmed the applicant was a future retiree and that the DFAS did not have any information on the applicant relating to his SBP.
9. Public Law 95-397, the RCSBP, enacted 30 September 1978, provides a way for those who had qualified for reserve retirement but were not yet age 60 to provide an annuity for their survivors should they die before reaching age 60. Three options are available: (a) elect to decline enrollment and choose at age
60 whether to start SBP participation; (b) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity if they die before age 60, but delay payment of it until the date of the member's 60th birthday; or (c) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity immediately upon their death if before age 60. A member must make the election within 90 days of receiving the notification of eligibility to receive retired pay at age 60, or else wait until he/she applies for retired pay and elect to participate in the standard SBP. An election, once made, is irrevocable except under certain circumstances provided for by law.
10. Pursuant to Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1448(a)(5), a retired member who marries after retirement and who, at the time of marriage, has no dependent children and has not previously elected for spouse coverage may, within one year of the marriage, elect to cover his spouse under the SBP.
11. Public Law 108-375, enacted 28 October 2004, established an Open Season to be conducted from 1 October 2005 through 30 September 2006. Extensive publicity was given this SBP Open Season in Department of Defense websites, Army Echoes (the Army bulletin published and mailed to retirees to keep them abreast of their rights and privileges and to inform them of developments in the Army), other Army publications, and by military veteran organizations.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant contends that his records should be corrected to show he elected to participate in the RCSBP with immediate spouse coverage because he was never made aware of the fact that he had to enroll his spouse in the RCSBP within 1 year after their marriage in order for her to be covered by the RCSBP.
2. Records show that on 18 September 2000 the applicant was notified he would be eligible for retired pay upon application at age 60; he was provided information on the SBP at that time, and he elected SBP Option "C" with child coverage. Thus, the evidence of record does not support the applicant's contention that he was not made aware of the requirements to enroll his dependents in the RCSBP.
3. Records show the applicant was transferred to the Retired Reserve effective
1 October 2002 and the date of his marriage was 6 August 2005. The applicant's argument that had he been actively drilling at the time of his marriage, his spouse would have been automatically covered by the RCSBP is incorrect. The applicant would still have had to notify proper authorities of his marriage and request spouse coverage within 1 year, even if drilling at the time of his marriage.
4. By law, incident to a member's marriage/remarriage, a member who has no dependent children and has not previously elected for spouse coverage, has
1 year to provide an annuity to his spouse by making such an SBP election.
5. There is no evidence of record to show the applicant took the necessary action to notify USA HRC officials to change the category of his SBP election from child to spouse coverage within 1 year of his marriage (i.e., on 6 August 2005), as is required by law. In this regard, the DD Form 2656-6 submitted by the applicant to change his SBP coverage was submitted well after the 1 year period and did not satisfy the strict requirement for spouse SBP entitlement. In addition, there is no evidence the applicant submitted an application for spouse coverage during the SBP Open Season conducted from 1 October 2005 through 30 September 2006. Thus, in view of all of the foregoing, there is no basis for correcting the applicant's military service records. Therefore, relief cannot be granted in this case.
6. The applicant is advised that contrary to advice he has apparently received, he will not have an opportunity to enroll his spouse in the RCSBP at age 60. The applicant's only opportunity to enroll for spouse coverage will come, if and when, Congress next declares an Open Season.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
___X____ ___X____ ___X____ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
_______ _ X _______ ___
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20090005872
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20090005872
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011701
BOARD DATE: 8 December 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110011701 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. He was asked about his SBP election at that time and he elected spouse coverage. The evidence of record shows the first time the applicant requested a change to his RCSBP election to spouse coverage was when he applied for retired pay on 11 March 2010.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007344
The applicant requests that he not have any insurable interest costs for the period of 20060211 20080118 and that his election be changed to spouse only option C for immediate coverage effective 20080119. On 27 March 2012, the applicant submitted a change in his RCSBP election in which he attempted to change his election from insurable interest to spouse only coverage for full retired pay. There is no evidence to show that the applicant notified proper officials that he desired to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004269
The applicant provides copies: * DD Form 2656-6, dated 19 February 2013 * a State of Colorado Marriage License and Marriage Certificate CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. All of these open enrollment seasons were extensively publicized in Army Echoes to ensure all retirees were informed of their existence and also in the Army Times. He was authorized up to 1 year from the date of marriage to enroll his spouse and stepchildren in the RCSBP.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003739
The applicant states: * he was transferred to the Retired Reserve in September 1999 but he was not married at the time; he requested Reserve Component SBP (RCSBP) for his child who was a minor * he married his spouse in January 2005; shortly thereafter, they went to Fort Buchanan PR to obtain an ID card * they provided a copy of their marriage certificate, updated the Defense Eligibility Enrollment Reporting System (DEERS) and they were told the SBP was taken care of; they left Fort Buchanan...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080005060
The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her deceased spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he elected to change his Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) from "Children only" coverage to "Spouse" coverage. She was provided an application to submit to this Board. Regrettably, based on the evidence, the applicant is not entitled to a correction of the FSM's records to show he elected to change his RCSBP election from "Children only" coverage to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020024
The applicant provides: * DD Form 2656-6 (SBP Election Change Certificate), dated 29 September 2011 * letter, dated 22 August 2012, from the U.S. Army (USA) Human Resources Command (HRC) * Orders Number 189-27, dated 18 August 1992, issued by the Oklahoma Army National Guard (OKARNG) * DD Form 2656-7 (Verification for Survivor Annuity), dated 10 August 2012 * certificate of death * certificate of marriage * Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service Form W-4P (Withholding...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070011867
Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay at Age 60, dated 10 April 1995, which shows the applicant met the requirements for retired pay at age 60; c. a copy of DD Form 1883 (Survivor Benefit Plan Election Certificate), dated 11 May 1995; d. a copy of Orders Number 306-083, dated 2 November 1995, published by the Alabama Army National Guard (ARNG) which shows that the applicant was discharged from the ARNG, effective 1 November 1995, then transferred to the Retired Reserve; e. a copy of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023506
An SBP and RCSBP Open Enrollment Election that shows the applicant married Pamela R. R----, on 6 October 2007; that he had no dependent children; and he elected to participate in the SBP with spouse only coverage, based on full gross retired pay, with the full enrollment premium amount deducted from his retired pay in 24 monthly installments. The applicant married on 6 October 2007; however, there is no evidence that he elected RCSBP spouse coverage within 1 year of the marriage date. The...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100006903
The applicant requests that his military records be changed to show he elected spouse and children coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). On 27 February 2009, the applicant completed a DD Form 2656-6 and indicated that he was married and elected spouse and children SBP coverage based on the full gross pay without supplemental SBP. A DD Form 2656-5 shows that 14 September 2006 the applicant elected children only SBP coverage under Option C. He did not have a spouse at the time.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011191
The applicant requests, in effect, that his records be corrected to show he requested spouse Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) coverage in a timely manner. He provided a DD Form 1883, dated 1 May 1994, which shows on that date he was not married and he elected to participate in the RCSBP for children only coverage, full base amount, option C (Immediate Annuity). Evidence indicates he first attempted to request a change to his SBP election in conjunction with his application...