Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020216
Original file (20120020216.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	 

		BOARD DATE:	     2 July 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120020216


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, retroactive promotion to the rank/grade of staff sergeant (SSG)/E-6 and correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show this adjusted rank/grade.

2.  The applicant states:

* his record is in error due to his chain of command not following the proper protocol in advancing him to the next rank during his time in service
* he is submitting several of his DA Forms 2166-8 (Noncommissioned Officer Evaluation Report (NCOER)) that demonstrate his competence as an NCO and as a Soldier
* he met the time-in-service (TIS) and time-in-grade (TIG) requirements for promotion to SSG – the only prerequisite he did not meet was graduation from the Warrior Leader Course (WLC)
* on numerous occasions, he requested to attend WLC – however, his chain of command would not authorize him to attend due to the physical profile he received after being wounded during combat operations
* he was not able to participate in an airborne operation due to his injuries and he was not allowed to attend WLC as a result
* he met the 5-month TIG requirement as a sergeant (SGT) and he met the 48-month TIS requirement
* he had no adverse actions in his record that would have impeded his ability to be promoted – in fact, he received two Army Good Conduct Medals between 23 September 2003 and 22 September 2009

3.  The applicant provides his NCOER's for the following periods:

* 1 January 2006 through 31 December 2006
* 1 January 2008 through 29 April 2008
* 1 May 2008 through 30 April 2009
* 1 May 2009 through 30 April 2010

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 23 September 2003.  He completed initial entry training and was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 11B (Infantryman).

2.  On 1 January 2006, he was promoted to the rank/grade of SGT/E-5.

3.  His records show he deployed to Iraq in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom on two occasions:

* from 21 September 2005 through 14 February 2006
* from 2 January 2007 through 18 March 2008

4.  On 1 May 2011, he was retired by reason of temporary disability in the rank/grade of SGT/E-5.  On 2 May 2011, he was placed on the Temporary Disability Retired List in the rank/grade of SGT/E-5.  His DD Form 214 contains the following entries:

* item 4a (Grade, Rate or Rank) – "SGT"
* item 4b (Pay Grade) – "E05"
* item 12h (Effective Date of Pay Grade) – "2006  01  01"

5.  His records are void of documentation that shows:

* a DA Form 3349 (Physical Profile) identifying the physical limitations imposed on him after he was wounded in Iraq
* he attended and completed WLC
* he was repeatedly denied attendance at WLC
* he appeared before a semi-centralized promotion board (usually conducted at battalion level)
* a board recommended him for promotion to the rank/grade of SSG/E-6
* he was assigned an appropriate number of administrative points based on his performance before a semi-centralized promotion board
* those administrative points were uploaded into the Electronic Military Personnel Office database for inclusion in his Enlisted Record Brief (ERB)
* he was in a promotable status at the time he was retired from the Army

6.  Army Regulation 600-8-19 (Enlisted Promotions and Reductions) prescribes policies and procedures governing promotion and reduction of Army enlisted personnel.  Chapter 3 governs the SGT and SSG semi-centralized promotion system for Active Army Soldiers.

	a.  Field-grade commanders in units authorized a commander in the rank/grade of lieutenant colonel/O-5 or higher have promotion authority to the ranks of SGT and SSG.  However, the promotion work center maintains the recommended list and issues the orders.

	b.  Promotions to the rank/grade of SGT and SSG are executed in a semi-centralized manner.

		(1)  Field operations will handle board appearance, promotion point calculation, and promotion list maintenance.  However, final execution of the promotion occurs in the field in a Decentralized manner.

		(2)  Headquarters, Department of the Army (HQDA), operations will handle promotion cutoff scores and the monthly SGT/SSG promotion selection by-name list which are determined and announced monthly.

		(3)  HQDA and the U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC) will determine the needs of the Army by grade and MOS.

		(4)  A Soldier's total points are forwarded through the appropriate database, as determined by HRC, to the automated system.  These points are consolidated into an Army-wide listing of eligible Soldiers by MOS maintained in the automated system.  A determination is then made for each MOS as to what promotion point cutoff score would promote the desired number of Soldiers to meet the needs of the Army in a specific month.  These decisions are based primarily upon budget constraints and individual MOS requirements.

	c.  Paragraph 3-10 governs the eligibility requirements for promotion to SSG.  Table 3-3 states that a Soldier must be a graduate of WLC prior to board appearance for SSG.  WLC may be waived for deployed Soldiers by the Deputy Chief of Staff, G-1, for 270 days after redeployment.

7.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army.  Paragraph 2-4h provides detailed instructions and source document(s) for completing each block of the DD Form 214.  Subparagraph 2-4h(4) states items 4a and 4b contain the active duty grade or rank and pay grade at the time of separation, taken from the ERB.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's request for retroactive promotion to the rank/grade of SSG/E-6 and correction of his DD Form 214 to show this adjusted rank/grade was carefully considered.

2.  The evidence of record shows he did not attend or graduate from WLC.  Consequently, he never appeared before, or was recommended for promotion to SSG by a battalion-level SSG semi-centralized promotion board.

3.  He contends he was otherwise eligible for promotion with the exception of being a WLC graduate.  However, due to his physical profile limitations, his chain of command repeatedly denied his requests to attend WLC.

4.  The governing regulation clearly requires Soldiers to be graduates of WLC prior to board appearance.  Deployed Soldiers may request a waiver; however, he redeployed from Iraq on 18 March 2008, so any previously-requested waiver for WLC attendance would have expired 9 months after his redeployment.

5.  Unfortunately, he provides no evidence and his records contain no evidence that he requested or was authorized a waiver for WLC attendance.  Additionally, his records do not contain his physical profile that addresses his physical limitations or shows he was unable to attend WLC.

6.  Regardless, he did not meet the criteria for promotion to SSG and he has not provided a compelling reason, substantiated by evidence, to waive the education requirements adhered to by other Soldiers, retired for disability or not.  Accordingly, there is an insufficient basis at this time to grant the requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X___  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _  X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100015543



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120020216




5


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000209

    Original file (20150000209.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, promotion to sergeant (SGT)/pay grade E-5 effective 1 August 2013 and all back pay due as a result. The applicant provides: * four promotion point worksheets (PPW) – Unofficial Copy * an HRC memorandum, subject: Department of the Army Promotion Point Cutoff Scores for 1 August 2013 and Junior Enlisted Issues for the Active Army (AA) * a memorandum, subject: Request an Administrative Records Correction (ARC) for [Applicant], issued by Headquarters, 532nd...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130022143

    Original file (20130022143.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * upon her enlistment in the Regular Army (RA), her prior U.S. Marine Corps SGT date of rank (DOR) was not calculated as "20030301 minus 10 months" * upon reaching her unit, the 14th Engineer Battalion, she tried repeatedly to fix the error so she could attend the Warrior Leader Course (WLC) * she was unable to attend the WLC due to her DOR being 20070809 instead of 20040114 * she was told she was not senior enough [and] could not fix DJHS (unknown acronym) screen...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090019947

    Original file (20090019947.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The advisory official stated that after a thorough review of the applicant's records, his office recommends his reinstatement to the rank of SFC with the understanding that he will not be eligible for promotion to master sergeant (MSG) until he completes all required NCO education courses. Neither promotion order indicates his promotion was conditional upon completion of NCOES. a. Paragraph 1-27 (NCOES Requirement for Promotion and Conditions Promotion) states that a Soldier must be a WLC...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120019751

    Original file (20120019751.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * a memorandum from her previous unit commander, recommending she receive 150 duty performance points for her battalion's June 2010 semi-centralized promotion board * the supporting documentation that substantiates her promotion board administrative points * a memorandum from the President of the Board, Headquarters, Special Troops Battalion, I Corps, Joint Base Lewis-McChord, WA, dated 2 June 2010, subject: Promotion Board Proceedings for Promotion to SGT and Staff...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002288

    Original file (20140002288.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his military records to show he was promoted to staff sergeant (SSG) with a date of rank (DOR) of 1 June 2011. The message states, in part, Brigade/Battalion S-1 and Unit HR Specialists will assist Soldiers with updating their personnel records through the electronic Military Personnel Office (eMILPO) system and update training records through the S3/G3 Army Training Requirements and Resources System (ATTRS) Representative. His request did not warrant a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019182

    Original file (20100019182.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Counsel states, in effect, the applicant was unjustly reduced to SGT/E-5 because he did not complete the conditional requirement of his promotion to complete the Warrior Leader Course (WLC) within 270 days of his return to his home station. Available evidence shows he did not return to his home station until 1 June 2009, when he was honorably released from active duty. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015189

    Original file (20130015189.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * a letter, dated 10 July 2013, from the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Medical Center, Battle Creek, MI * Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) Record of Proceedings, dated 6 June 2013, with cover letter * five memoranda, dated between 2 March 2005 and 1 October 2007 * DA Form 7574 (Military Physician's Statement of Soldier's Incapacitation/Fitness for Duty), dated 17 November 2006 * DA Form 2173 (Statement of Medical Examination and Duty...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021880

    Original file (20110021880.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his military records by voiding his reduction in rank to sergeant (SGT), pay grade E-5. b. Paragraph 10-16 (Reductions for Failure to complete Training) provides that Soldiers conditionally promoted in accordance with paragraph 1–27 of this regulation are administratively reduced to the grade previously held upon failure to complete the training requirement established in that provision. The applicant contends that his military records should be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013155

    Original file (20130013155.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1372 (Grade on Retirement Physical Disability, Members of the Armed Forces), states that unless entitled to a higher retired grade under some other provision of law, any member of an Armed Force who is retired for physical disability under section 1201 or 1204 of this title, or whose name is placed on the TDRL under section 1202 or 1205 of this title, is entitled to the grade equivalent to the highest of the following: * the grade or rank in which he is serving...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003382

    Original file (20130003382.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    c. When Military Personnel (MILPER) Message Number 08-033, subject: (Updated) AAA-294 Enlisted Promotion Report – Automatic List Integration Section for Staff Sergeant) was issued on 1 February 2008, he was never informed of its provisions and he was not aware of any action by the U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC) to put him on the standing list for promotion to SSG/E-6. The company commander, first sergeant, and the battalion command sergeant major formed negative opinions of him...