Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120019600
Original file (20120019600.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		

		BOARD DATE:	  29 August 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120019600 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests the Army Reserve Components Achievement Medal (ARCAM) be added to his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 8 January 1993.

2.  He states:

	a.  item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized (All periods of service)) of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 8 January 1993 is incomplete.  It should list award of the ARCAM.  

   b.  his National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) lists award of the Army Service Ribbon, National Defense Service Medal, Army Reserve Components Overseas Training Ribbon, and ARCAM.

3.  He provides his DD Form 214 for period ending 8 January 1993 and his NGB Form 22.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of 
justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Army National Guard (ARNG) on 27 November 1987.  He was ordered to active duty for training (ADT) on 14 July 1988.  At the completion of ADT on 14 October 1988, he was awarded military occupational specialty 11B (Infantryman) (a period of 3 months and 1 month).  

3.  On 17 September 1990, he was ordered to active duty in an Active Guard Reserve (AGR) status.  

4.  He was released from active duty (REFRAD) on 8 January 1993 after completion of 2 years, 4 months, and 10 days of active military service.  His DD Form 214 for this period doesn't show award of the ARCAM.  

5.  He was discharged from the ARNG on 26 November 1993 and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Annual Training).  His NGB Form 22 shows award of the ARCAM.  

6.  His service record is void of evidence which indicates the period of qualifying service for his award of the ARCAM.  

7.  Orders D-02-61-616705, dated 6 February 1996, published by the U.S. Army Reserve Personnel Center, St. Louis, MO, discharged him from the USAR, effective 6 February 1996.

8.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the ARCAM is authorized for award to Army personnel for exemplary behavior, efficiency, and fidelity while serving as a member of an ARNG or USAR troop program unit or as an individual mobilization augmentee.  The regulation currently states AGR Soldiers are not authorized the ARCAM.  Individuals must have completed 4 years of qualifying service on or after 3 March 1972 and before 28 March 1995.  Beginning 28 March 1995, the period of qualifying service for award of the ARCAM was reduced from 4 to 3 years.  This change is not retroactive.  

9.  Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated effective 1 September 1982, AGR personnel became eligible for award of the Good Conduct Medal.  For AGR personnel, the Good Conduct Medal qualification period may commence at any time during the 3 years immediately preceding the 1 September 1982 effective date provided no portion of service for the Good Conduct Medal is included in a period of service for which the ARCAM was awarded.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant served in the ARNG from 27 November 1987 through 26 November 1993.  His NGB Form 22 for this period shows the ARCAM.  

2.  Based on the regulation in effect at the time, effective 1 September 1982 AGR personnel became eligible for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal.  Therefore, he would not have been eligible for the ARCAM at least for the period 27 November 1987 – 8 January 1993.  However, it is the policy of this Board to not disadvantage an applicant by making him any worse off for having applied for a correction to his record.  Therefore, the existing ARCAM will not be removed from his NGB Form 22.  

3.  Based on the foregoing, the ARCAM is not authorized to be added to his DD Form 214 for the period ending 8 January 1993.  

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__x___  ___x_____  ___x_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _ x  _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.


ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120019600





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120019600



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012416

    Original file (20100012416.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant also submits a copy of an ARCAM award memorandum, dated 7 October 1995, showing his award of the ARCAM (4th Award) for the period 1 August 1992 to 31 July 1995. He was awarded the OSR for that period of service. The evidence shows that on 7 October 1995 he was issued a memorandum awarding him the ARCAM (4th Award) for the period 1 August 1992 to 31 July 1995.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050002354C070206

    Original file (20050002354C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the AGCM is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. However, the available evidence of record shows he did not complete any qualifying years during his Reserve Component service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009225

    Original file (20140009225.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The ARCAM is awarded for every 4 years of honorable USAR service. (2) Effective 28 March 1995, the period of qualifying service for award of the ARCAM is reduced from 4 to 3 years. c. There is no evidence of record and he did not provide sufficient evidence showing he was authorized or awarded the ARCAM during his period of service in the USAR.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009142

    Original file (20120009142.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 18 June 1999 to add the following awards: * Meritorious Service Medal (MSM) (2nd Award) * Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) (5th Award) * Army Achievement Medal (AAM) (5th Award) * Army Superior Unit Award (ASUA) (2nd Award) * Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) (4th Award) * National Defense Service Medal (NDSM) (2nd Award) * Noncommissioned Officer (NCO)...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070010452C080407

    Original file (20070010452C080407.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, reconsideration of his earlier petition requesting that his Army Achievement Medal (AAM) be upgraded to an Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM); and that his Army National Guard (ARNG) separation document (NGB Form 22) be corrected by adding all awards, badges, schools, and deployments. He claims the following awards and badges were erroneously omitted from his NGB Form 22: Army Service Ribbon (ASR); Noncommissioned Officer Professional Development Ribbon...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070010452

    Original file (20070010452.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, reconsideration of his earlier petition requesting that his Army Achievement Medal (AAM) be upgraded to an Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM); and that his Army National Guard (ARNG) separation document (NGB Form 22) be corrected by adding all awards, badges, schools, and deployments. He claims the following awards and badges were erroneously omitted from his NGB Form 22: Army Service Ribbon (ASR); Noncommissioned Officer Professional Development Ribbon...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071131C070402

    Original file (2002071131C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. APPLICANT REQUESTS: Correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release from Active Duty) corrected to show that he had 2 months of foreign service, prior service from 21 August 1985 to 10 November 1987 and, in effect, that he had been authorized or awarded the Reserve Components Overseas Service Ribbon, the Army Reserve...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021501

    Original file (20090021501.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant contends that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show the Army Reserve Components Achievement Medal, the Army Reserve Components Overseas Training Ribbon (2nd Award), and the Armed Forces Reserve Medal with “Hourglass” and “M” device. With respect to award of the Army Reserve Components Achievement Medal, the evidence of record shows the applicant’s immediate commander awarded him the Army Reserve Components Achievement Medal for service from 10 December 1986 through 10...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080001123

    Original file (20080001123.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his record and separation document (DD Form 214) be corrected to show his entitlement to the Kuwait Liberation Medal-Saudi Arabia (KLM-SA), Kuwait Liberation Medal-Kuwait (KLM-KU), Armed Forces Reserve Medal (AFRM) with silver hourglass (2nd Award) and "M" (Mobilization) Device; Army Reserve Component Achievement Medal (ARCAM) 5th Oak Leaf Cluster (6th Award), and Army Reserve Component Overseas Training Ribbon (ARCOTR) 2nd Oak Leaf Cluster (3rd...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002463

    Original file (20090002463.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He responded by reiterating his request to be issued a 15 year letter certifying his eligibility for retired pay at age 60, and further requests that he be given 20 additional inactive duty points for RYE 12 June 1998 for completion of the Army Sales and Management Training Course which would give him a total of 53 retirement points for that year; and he requests that he be given 4 months credit for the months he was assigned to different units between 28 June 1992 to 27 June 1993. While...