Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120019479
Original file (20120019479.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  11 June 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120019479 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show she was released from active duty (REFRAD) on 24 September 2012.

2.  The applicant states she was not permitted to clear her unit until her property hand receipts were signed by her replacement.  She contends that her unit had informed her in writing that a request to extend her tour was being initiated for a 45-day period.  Also, the applicant contends that she was undergoing medical treatment for an emergent problem with serious medical consequences.

3.  The applicant provides copies of:

* DD Form 214
* Orders A-07-115869, U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC), dated 21 July 2011
* Orders A-07-115869A01, HRC, dated 9 October 2011
* Medical Report, Upper Chesapeake Medical Center, dated 17 June 2012
* Memorandum for Record, U.S. Army 20th Support Command,             dated 21 June 2012
* Memorandum for Record, U.S. Army 20th Support Command,             dated 29 June 2012
* Email communications concerning the applicant's property hand receipts, dated between 15 June and 25 July 2012
* DA Form 137-1 (Unit Clearance Record), dated 1 August 2012
* Medical Clearance checklist, dated 5 September 2012
* Post Deployment Health Assessment Survey, dated 5 September 2012
* Letter from Inspector General (IG), HRC, dated 7 September 2012
* Letter from IG, 3rd Medical Command, dated 12 September 2012
* Orders 268-0002, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland,                      dated 24 September 2012
* Finance Mobilization/Demobilization Documentation Requirements Checklist, dated 1 October 2012

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  At the time of her application, the applicant was serving in the rank of lieutenant colonel, pay grade O-5, in a troop program unit, U.S. Army Reserve.

2.  Orders A-07-115869, HRC, dated 21 July 2011, ordered the applicant to active duty to provide contingency operational support for Operation Enduring Freedom.  Her report date was 1 August 2011 to Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland.  Her period of active duty was for 314 days, including accumulated leave, with an ending date of 9 June 2012.

3.  In an email dated 27 June 2012, the applicant was advised by her replacement that she would probably be extended for 45 days to resolve hand receipt discrepancies or to complete a report of survey.

4.  On 23 July 2012, the property book officer stated in an email that the applicant's hand receipt had been updated and was "good to go."

5.  A DA Form 137-1, dated 1 August 2012, indicates that the applicant had cleared property accountability and pay items.  The form was verified by the battalion personnel officer/unit commander on 1 August 2012.

6.  In a letter dated 7 September 2012, the IG, HRC, informed the applicant that her inquiry regarding an amendment to her mobilization orders had revealed her unit did not request an extension of her mobilization orders, nor did her unit send her to the transition center to ensure she would meet her REFRAD date.  The evidence she had provided showed the applicant was ordered to stay beyond her REFRAD date in order to complete inventories of equipment and that an extension would be requested.  The applicant's unit was required to request an extension prior to her REFRAD date.  Because the unit failed to make such a request, HRC could not extend her orders.  The applicant's orders were self-terminating without an amendment to extend them.  HRC had exhausted every course of action and recommended that she submit an appeal to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR).

7.  In a letter dated 12 September 2012, the IG, 3rd Medical Command, advised the applicant that a thorough inquiry into her concerns regarding the status of her mobilization extension and incapacitation pay (INCAP), if such extension was not approved, had been conducted.  Because HRC had determined they could not process an extension of her mobilization order, the best course of action to assist with getting her DD Form 214 and initiating INCAP was to refer the case to the Regional Support Command (RSC).  Accordingly, the case was referred to the IG, 99th RSC, located at Fort Dix, New Jersey.

8.  Orders 268-0002, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland, dated 24 September 2012, released the applicant from active duty with an effective date of 9 June 2012.

9.  The applicant's DD Form 214 indicates that it was processed and signed on 24 September 2012.  It shows in Item 12 (Record of Service):

* Date Entered Active Duty This Period: 1 August 2011
* Separation Date this Period:                 9 June 2012
* Net Active Service this Period:              0 years; 10 months; and 9 days

10.  It also shows in Item 18 (Remarks), in part, “Continuous Honorable Active Service: 20110801-20120609.”

11.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) provides detailed instructions for completing separation documents, including the DD Form 214.  It provides that the DD Form 214 is a summary of a Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty.  It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active duty service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge.  The DD Form 214 is not intended to have any legal effect on termination of a Soldier's service.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that her DD Form 214 should be corrected to show she was REFRAD on 24 September 2012 because she was retained on active duty until her property hand receipts were signed by her replacement.

2.  The available evidence clearly shows that the applicant was not released from active duty until 24 September 2012, even though her DD Form 214 shows a date of 9 June 2012.

3.  The failure of the applicant's unit to request in a timely manner an extension of her mobilization orders resulted in her being unjustly denied certain entitlements.  Therefore, it would be appropriate to amend her mobilization orders to show her period of active duty as ending on 24 September 2012.

4.  Furthermore, the applicant's DD Form 214 should be corrected to show in Item 12 that she was separated from active duty on 24 September 2012 and had completed 1 year, 1 month, and 24 days of net active service during this period.

5.  The applicant's military pay records should be audited and any monies due as a result of this correction be paid to her.

BOARD VOTE:

____X____  ___X____  ____X____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

	a.  amending Orders A-07-115869, U.S. Army Human Resources Command, dated 21 July 2011, to show her period of active duty as ending on 24 September 2012;

	b.  correcting Item 12 of her DD Form 214 to show:

* Separation Date This Period:  2012 - 09 - 24
* Net Active Service this Period:  1 Year - 1 Month - 24 days; and

	c.  correcting Item 18 to show: 

* Continous Honorable Active Service: 20110801-20120924 (in lieu of through 20120609)

   
   
   
   d.  Paying her any monies due as a result of this correction.



      _______ _   _X______   ___
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.


ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120019479





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120019479



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020880

    Original file (20130020880.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides the following additional documents in support of her request: a. medical consults for urology, psychology, psychiatry, podiatry, and dermatology, dated 24 September 2010; b. WAMC memorandum, dated 23 November 2010, that authorized the applicant 10 days convalescent leave; c. Health Net Federal Services letter, dated 27 July 2011, that authorized the applicant surgical care from 19 July 2011 to 21 November 2011 for follow-up visits for Solitary Cyst of Breast and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008058

    Original file (20140008058.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    She provided a copy of her DD Form 214 for the period ending 30 June 2008 [TAB P], which shows she was retired from active duty on 30 June 2008 after completing 1 year and 11 days net active service this period. The evidence of record shows the applicant was issued Orders 142-0001, dated 21 May 2008, published by the U.S. Army Garrison, Fort Belvoir, VA, retiring her on 30 June 2008 and placing her on the retired list on the following date, in the rank of LTC. Since her service computation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011464

    Original file (20130011464.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The CIG, 79th SSC testified that the email sent by the complainant detailed systemic issues between USARC and the JAG officer. The allegation that the applicant improperly denied the complainant's request for extension of IG duty and deployment, in reprisal for making a protected communication, in violation of DOD Directive 7050.06 was substantiated. The allegation that the applicant had improperly denied the complainant's request for extension of IG duty and deployment, in reprisal for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008383

    Original file (20130008383.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests: a. her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 1 June 2003 be added to her Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR) on the interactive Personnel Electronic Records Management System (iPERMS). The applicant provides: * two applications * page 4 of her Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) Record of Proceedings, dated 15 November 2012 * DD Form 214 for the period ending 1 June 2003 CONSIDERATION OF...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017711

    Original file (20140017711.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant, the spouse of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests, in effect, Title 10 orders placing the FSM in an active duty status for the period 11 November 2010 to 23 January 2012, and all back pay and allowances due, plus the benefits the FSM would have been entitled to receive at the time of death. c. Certificate of Death, State of Arizona, which shows the FSM date of death as 23 January 2012. d. A memorandum from the NGB, dated 21 February 2012, referencing an approval...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001565

    Original file (20150001565.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    (3) At page 17 of the redacted IG report, the IG pointedly redacted from its report that on 25 July 2012, well before her decision to revoke her recommendation of an extension for LTC F, the applicant received a detailed, factual IG complaint from CPT C detailing alleged specific acts of misconduct by LTC F. Additionally, the applicant was provided a copy of the matters submitted by CPT C in response to the professional responsibility inquiry. The directing authority or command or State IG...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024664

    Original file (20100024664.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    DA PPG, in effect at the time of the applicant's mobilization, provided that RC Soldiers who voluntarily requested to serve beyond their 24-month mobilization authorized under the provisions of Title 10, U.S. Code could request an extension under the policy guidance for CO-ADOS. The evidence also shows she requested and was granted a voluntary extension of her mobilization in a CO-ADOS status which began on 22 July 2009 and resulted in her serving continuously in Iraq from 25 October 2008...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016814

    Original file (20110016814.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests reinstatement to the rank/grade of sergeant (SGT)/E-5 and correction of her records to show she was promoted to SGT/E-5 with a date of rank (DOR) of September 2004. The DD Form 214 she was issued for this period of service shows her rank as SGT and DOR as 1 February 2002. d. Based on the above, recommend that: * All documents in the applicant's file from 1 February 2002 to 23 November 2004 reflecting the rank of SGT be amended to reflect the rank of PFC * The Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011635

    Original file (20110011635.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The healthcare provider assessed the applicant as having tendonitis patellar. b. Paragraph 8-6 states that when a commander or other proper authority believes that a Soldier not on extended active duty is unable to perform the duties of their office, grade, rank, or rating because of physical disability, the commander will refer the Soldier for medical evaluation in accordance with Army Regulation 40-501 (Standards of Medical Fitness). The evidence of record shows the applicant was on...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000133

    Original file (20090000133.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending on 21 March 2006, hereafter referred to as the subject DD Form 214, be corrected to show she entered an active duty status at the end of February 2005 instead of 9 April 2005. She also requests that the DD Form 214 be corrected to show all of her active duty service. There is no DD Form 214 in the applicant’s record for this period of service.