Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120018369
Original file (20120018369.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		

		BOARD DATE:	  16 May 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120018369 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show item 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation) as "disability" vice "discharge of personnel who did not meet procurement medical fitness standards."

2.  The applicant states he was injured while he was in the Army.  He fell down some stairs, went to the hospital, and then he was discharged.  After he was out [of the Army], he had surgery at the Department of Veterans Affairs Hospital, Shreveport, LA.  He has been on disability for over 30 years and had more surgery related to this injury.

3.  The applicant provides his DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's records show he enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Delayed Entry Program (DEP) on 10 September 1979. 

3.  On 25 September 1979, he signed a Consent to Extension in the DEP form, wherein it stated he had been found temporarily disqualified for enlistment in the Regular Army (RA) because of a broken arm and he agreed to extend in the DEP for a period of 55 days.  His new date for enlistment in the RA was 20 November 1979.  He was discharged from the DEP on 16 October 1979.

4.  On 17 October 1979, he requested to change his enlistment date to 17 October 1979 as he no longer had a medical disqualification.

5.  He enlisted in the RA on 17 October 1979 and he was assigned to the U.S. Army Reception Station, Fort Jackson, SC, for further assignment to a basic training (BT) unit.

6.  His records are void of the specific facts and circumstances surrounding his discharge processing.  However, his records contain a DD Form 214 that shows he was honorably discharged on 19 December 1979 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel), paragraph 5-7c(2) by reason of discharge of personnel who did not meet procurement medical fitness standards.  He completed 2 months and 3 days of net active service.

7.  His DD Form 214 also shows his last duty assignment as the U.S. Army Reception Station, Fort Jackson, SC.

8.  There is no evidence in his record that shows he was injured while serving on active duty, or treated and/or hospitalized for any injuries incurred while serving on active duty.

9.  Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-7c(2) of the version in effect at the time, stated members who were not medically qualified under procurement medical fitness standards when accepted for initial enlistment will be separated when medical proceedings, regardless of the date completed, establishes that a medical condition was identified by appropriate military medical authority within 4 months of the member's initial entrance on active duty or active duty for training which does not qualify him for retention in the military service.  Separation will accomplished within 72 hours following approval by the discharge authority and members who have not completed BT will be discharged.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record is void of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicant's discharge processing.  However, the DD Form 214 he was issued shows he was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-7c(2) while still assigned the Reception Station, Fort Jackson, SC.  It appears that prior to being assigned to a BT unit, he was determined to have a medical condition that did not medically qualify him for enlistment in the RA under procurement medical fitness standards.  According, discharge procedures were initiated against him.

2.  There is no evidence in his available records and he has not provided any evidence that shows he was injured while on serving on active duty, or treated and/or hospitalized for any injuries incurred while serving on active duty 

3.  In the absence of evidence to the contrary, it is presumed his discharge processing was accomplished in compliance with applicable regulations with no indication of procedural errors which would have jeopardized his rights.  

4.  His DD Form 214 properly shows the reason for his discharge as discharge of personnel who did not meet procurement medical fitness standards.  This is the correct narrative reason for Soldiers discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-7c(2).

5.  In view of the foregoing, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__X____  __X______  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case


are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _ X  _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120018369





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120018369



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009185

    Original file (20130009185.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) to show he was discharged due to a medical condition received on active duty vice honorably discharged. On 3 July 1977, the applicant's records went before a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The evidence of record confirms that on 3 July 1977, just 4 days after the applicant enlisted in the RA and while still assigned to the Fort Jackson Reception Station, an MEB found he was medically unfit for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130007340

    Original file (20130007340.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DD Form 214 he was issued for this period of service shows he was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 7, section IV, by reason of defective enlistment agreement with an uncharacterized character of service. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (SPD Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214. The evidence of record confirms the applicant was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014190

    Original file (20080014190.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DD Form 4 further shows that, on 4 June 1979, he was discharged from the USAR DEP and he enlisted in the Regular Army (RA) on 5 June 1979 for a period of 3 years and entered active duty on that date. The evidence of record confirms the applicant initially enlisted in the USAR DEP on 18 May 1979, and that he was discharged from the DEP and enlisted in the RA and entered active duty on 5 June 1979, as evidenced by the DD Form 4 and active duty orders on file in his record. As a result,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012362

    Original file (20140012362.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A medical proceeding conducted by an EPSB, regardless of the date completed, must establish that a medical condition was identified by appropriate medical authority within six months of the Soldier's initial entrance on active duty, the condition would have permanently or temporarily disqualified the Soldier for entry into the military service had it been detected at the time of enlistment, and the medical condition does not disqualify the Soldier from retention in the service under the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 04102379C070208

    Original file (04102379C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    After reporting to the medical clinic, he was told that he had back strain and an ankle sprain and that x-rays of his spine showed scoliosis with a “30-degree curvature of the spine and that 20 degrees was the most that they would allow in the Army.” He states the examining physician told him that his condition should have been caught at the entrance station and that he would be processed for discharge. The applicant concurred and requested to “be discharged from the US Army without delay.”...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024784

    Original file (20100024784.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 10 June 1992 be corrected to show his basic training (BT). He was issued a DD Form 214 for active duty training (ADT) from 10 June to 1 September 1992 which was the second part of his SOTP. Army Regulation 635-5, paragraph 12e, in effect at the time states that a DD Form 220 is issued upon completion of the BT portion for members enlisted under the USAR SOTP and the Army...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090003722

    Original file (AR20090003722.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Application Receipt Date: 2009/01/21 Prior Review: Prior Review Date: NA I. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number AR20090003722 ______________________________________________________________________________ Page 1 of 3 pages

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016553

    Original file (20100016553.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. Therefore, his enlistment contract which shows he enlisted in the RA on 26 January 1983 is accepted as sufficient evidence on which to amend item 12a of his DD Form 214 to show he entered active duty on 26 January 1983. In addition, item...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150002100

    Original file (20150002100.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    c. A DA Form 8-118 (Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) Proceedings), dated 10 September 1969, shows an MEB convened and considered his medical condition. The MEB recommended his separation from the service for an EPTS condition under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Administrative Personnel Separations), paragraph 5-9. Paragraph 5-9 of the regulation stated that Soldiers who were not medically qualified under the procurement medical fitness standards...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021038

    Original file (20140021038.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was offered surgery at the hospital in the next 2 days versus a separation from the military for a condition that existed prior to entry in the service (EPTS) per Army regulations. The DD Form 214 he was issued shows he was discharged on 29 September 1989 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Separations), paragraph 5-11, by reason of not meeting procurement medical fitness standards - no disability, with an uncharacterized character of...