Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120013717
Original file (20120013717.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		
		BOARD DATE:	  7 February 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120013717 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests cancellation of his enlistment bonus recoupment under the Selected Reserve Incentive Program (SRIP).

2.  The applicant states he believes the State should have stopped payment before he received it.  He states he started his technician job 1 month prior to receiving the bonus.

3.  The applicant provides an undated, self-authored letter.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the Washington Army National Guard (WAARNG) for 8 years on 5 February 1997.  He extended his enlistment for 6 months on 5 January 2003.  He extended his enlistment for 6 months on 5 June 2006.

2.  Section II (Eligibility), number 3 on the Reenlistment/Extension Bonus Addendum he signed on 5 June 2006 states that upon his reenlistment or extension in the Army National Guard of the United States he was eligible for a Reenlistment or Extension Bonus under the SRIP if he was not reenlisting or extending for Title 10 or Title 32 Active Guard/Reserve tour or for a technician position.


3.  Section V (Termination), number 5 on the Reenlistment/Extension Bonus Addendum states that he understood he would be terminated from bonus eligibility with recoupment if he accepted a military technician position.

4.  The available records show that the applicant is currently a member of the WAARNG.

5.  The applicant provides an undated, self-authored letter stating the following:

* in July 2006, he reenlisted in the WAARNG for 6 years
* with the expiration of his term of service 8 months out, he had no intention in seeking a full time technician job
* after returning to the States he was offered an opportunity to apply for a full time technician job not realizing the impact it would create towards his bonus
* he has completed many school courses and he remained military occupational specialty qualified
* he achieved course standards or higher
* his Noncommissioned Officer Evaluation Reports reflect greatly upon him for leadership training
* now, 5 years and 2 months into his current contract, he has been notified of the recoupment
* taking the money back would cause a significant impact on him and his family’s day to day living and quality of life
* having a child with special needs has taken a large toll on his family
* receiving his drill pay helps him provide for his family

6.  During the processing of the applicant’s appeal, an advisory opinion was obtained from the Incentives and Budget Branch, Enlisted Accessions Division, Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff, G-1, who stated:

* the Soldier signed a reenlistment/extension on 5 June 2006
* prior to the bonus effective date of 5 February 2007, the applicant accepted a military technician position
* he was paid an extension bonus of $15,000.00
* the Reenlistment/Extension Bonus Addendum he signed on 5 June 2006 clearly states in Section V that he would be terminated from bonus eligibility of he accepted a military technician position
* termination of eligibility was effective on the start date of the military technician position
* he accepted a military technician position on 7 January 2007, prior to the effective date of the bonus
* he was not eligible to receive the bonus
* he was erroneously paid and the bonus was recouped

7.  A copy of the advisory opinion was sent to the applicant on 27 August 2012 for his information and opportunity to respond.  No response was received.

8.  Army Regulation 135-7 (Army National Guard and Army Reserve Incentive Programs) prescribes the policy and procedures for the administration of the Army National Guard and the U.S. Army Reserve incentive programs.  The regulation identifies the documents required to effect a reenlistment or extension which includes reenlistment/extensive incentive annexes which applicants' are required to read and understand prior to effecting a reenlistment or extension.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contention that recoupment of his $15,000.00 ARNG reenlistment bonus should be cancelled is without merit.

2.  Evidence of record shows that the applicant was paid $15,000.00 towards a contract with the WAARNG.  He signed an enlistment bonus addendum prior to his receiving his bonus.  The addendum acknowledged he had been advised of and understood the conditions of the program which could cause suspension, or termination and recoupment.  

3.  The applicant's record shows that he clearly acknowledged that he understood the NGB policy and regulatory guidance in place at the time he signed his contract accepting an enlistment extension with bonus agreement.  

4.  In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s request should be denied.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__x___  ___x_____  ____x____  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   x_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120013717





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120013717



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013240

    Original file (20130013240.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * it is true he was not DMOSQ at the time of his extension * he was DMOSQ by 2 May 2007, well before his 12 July 2007 contract effective date * regarding acceptance of the AGR position, policy has since changed to allow a Soldier to retain incentives * he entered into a contract trusting he was eligible for the REB and SLRP * per the terms he had fully performed his end of the contract * he would not have agreed to the extension if not for the REB and SLRP 5. The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011135

    Original file (20130011135.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    She does not feel that the bonus should be recouped at all because she did not have a job at the time and she did wait the required 6 months if the date that she signed the reenlistment paperwork is utilized instead of the date the bonus was received. b. the applicant accepted a military technician position on 27 May 2007 and did not serve the required 6 months of her enlisted contract before the bonus start date of 25 January 2007, which is the date after ETS. Since her REB Addendum...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013225

    Original file (20130013225.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His REB Bonus Addendum, dated 27 February 2009, shows: a. he extended for a bonus in the amount of $15,000.00. To date, he has served over 5 years of this 6-year reenlistment, he deployed to Afghanistan, and he recently reenlisted for a 4-year period. The evidence of record does not support the applicant's contention his contract stated he would receive the total amount of the REB.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130022385

    Original file (20130022385.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). He stated: * review of the applicant's record showed he extended his ARNG enlistment on 10 April 2005 for 6 years in MOS 88M for an REB of $15,000.00 * the applicant served the full term of his extended contract and his MOS appeared on the 2005 Selected Reserve Incentive Program (SRIP) list 7. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army and State Army National Guard records of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120016680

    Original file (20120016680.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: a. The evidence of record shows the applicant enlisted in the WAARNG on 11 August 2006 for a 6-year period for a PSB of $15,000.00 and the SLRP of $20,000.00. The applicant was commissioned in the WAARNG on 17 August 2008 for an OAB of $10,000.00.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130006520

    Original file (20130006520.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 12 September 2012, the applicant was notified by the IDARNG State Incentive Manager who stated his bonus was in jeopardy of termination with recoupment since he accepted an indefinite military technician position from 26 November 2006 through 20 July 2008 which became a permanent military technician position from 20 July 2008 to the present; however, he was eligible to submit a request for an exception to policy. The advisory opinion stated the applicant extended on 27 September 2005 for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120012589

    Original file (20120012589.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests payment of a $15,000.00 reenlistment/extension bonus (REB). The applicant provides: * An REB ETP request * The NGB denial letter * DA Form 4836 (Oath of Extension or Enlistment or Reenlistment), dated 28 April 2006 * NGB Form 600-7-3-R-E (Annex R to DD Form 4 or DA Form 4836 (Reenlistment/Extension Bonus Addendum – ARNG of the United States) CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. He informed the MNARNG State Incentive Manager that the applicant extended her enlistment on 28...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019174

    Original file (20130019174.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A document generated by the National Guard Bureau (NGB) Information Management and Reporting Center shows the applicant's bonus was required to be recouped based on his acceptance of an AGR position prior to the start of his reenlistment contract; therefore, the contract should have been terminated at the time of acceptance. While in-processing into the AGR Program, he discussed his concern about receiving the bonus with his FLL, MSG T____. Notwithstanding the recommendation contained in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017108

    Original file (20130017108.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests cancellation of the financial recoupment action pertaining to his Selected Reserve Incentive Program (SRIP) bonus. He also signed a NGB Form 600-7-3-R-E (Reenlistment /Extension Bonus Addendum) which states termination of his bonus would occur without recoupment if he accepted a MILTECH position or Active Guard Reserve (AGR) position and on the effective date of his orders had served at least 6 months of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002344

    Original file (20140002344.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that on 23 January 2006 he signed a 6-year reenlistment contract and at the time he accepted an extension bonus of $15,000. The evidence of record shows the applicant signed a written agreement for a $15,000 bonus at the time of extension in the IDARNG for a period of 6 years on 23 January 2006. The evidence clearly shows that he extended on 28 July 2006 and accepted an indefinite MilTech position on 6 August 2006, which converted to a permanent MilTech position on 6...