Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120012080
Original file (20120012080.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	

		BOARD DATE:	  22 January 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120012080 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB).

2.  He states the CIB is a just due reward.

3.  He provides no additional documentation in support of this case.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the Unites States on 29 April 1968.  He successfully completed training and he was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 13A (Field Artillery Basic).

3.  The applicant arrived in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) on 20 September 1968 and he was assigned to A Battery, 1st Battalion, 92nd Artillery where he performed duties as a cannoneer.

4.  On or about 14 May 1969, he departed from the RVN en route to Japan as a result of a medical evacuation.  On 22 May 1969, he was assigned to the
249th General Hospital, Camp Drake, Japan in a patient status.

5.  Upon completion of medical treatment, on 20 July 1969, he was reassigned to C Battery, 1st Battalion, 79th Artillery, 7th Infantry Division, Republic of Korea (ROK) where he performed duties as a cannoneer.

6.  On 28 April 1970, he was honorably released from active duty at the expiration of his term of service and he was transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Annual Training) to complete his remaining service obligation.  He completed 2 years of total active service.  The DD Form 214 he was issued at the time does not show award of the CIB.

7.  There is no evidence in the applicant's available military service records that show he was awarded an infantry MOS or that served in an infantry unit while engaged in active ground combat.

8.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the CIB is awarded to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer persons who have an infantry military occupational specialty (MOS).  They must have served in active ground combat while assigned or attached to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental or smaller size.  Additionally, Appendix V of U.S. Army Vietnam (USARV) Regulation 672-1 states that during the Vietnam era the CIB was awarded only to enlisted individuals who held and served in MOS 11B, 11C, 11D, 11F, 11G, or 11H.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s request to add the CIB to his DD Form 214 was carefully considered.

2.  There is no evidence of record that shows the applicant was awarded an infantry MOS and that he served in an infantryman position.  Records show he was assigned to a field artillery unit in the RVN and his principal duties while in the RVN was that of a cannoneer.

3.  The three criteria for award of the CIB are to be assigned to an infantry unit while engaged in active ground combat, perform infantry duties, and hold an infantry specialty.  There is no evidence showing he met any of the criteria for award of the CIB.

4. In view of the foregoing, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ____X____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________X____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120012080



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120012080



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002096

    Original file (20120002096.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides the Army's awards policy. Army Regulation 600-8-22 states combat service alone does not qualify a member for the CIB.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004012

    Original file (20090004012.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, it would be appropriate to award him the AGCM for his qualifying period of honorable active duty service from 3 February 1969 through 7 September 1970 and to add this award to his record and DD Form 214. The applicant’s DA Form 20 confirms that throughout his assignment to the RVN, he held and served in an artillery MOS with an artillery unit. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding him the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013986

    Original file (20090013986.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) and that his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show that he was a specialist (SPC/E-4) or a sergeant (SGT/E-5). There is no evidence nor did the applicant submit any evidence that shows he held an infantry MOS during any of his assignments in the RVN. The evidence of record shows that at the time of his separation on 15 October 1975, the applicant held the rank/grade of PFC/E-3.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004612

    Original file (20140004612.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). His records show he enlisted in the Regular Army on 7 March 1967 and he was awarded military occupational specialty 36C (lineman) upon completion of training.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050003460C070206

    Original file (20050003460C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 1 November 2005 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20050003460 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of the Bronze Star Medal and the Combat Infantryman Badge. The record further shows that based on his RVN service and campaign participation, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002080617C070215

    Original file (2002080617C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that he be awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) and that his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show that he was awarded the Bronze Star Medal with "V" device. The applicant’s military records show that he was inducted on 12 December 1967. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that, in addition to the awards currently listed on his DD Form 214, the individual concerned...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004104514C070208

    Original file (2004104514C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s Enlisted Qualification Record (DA Form 20) shows that he served in the RVN from 26 December 1968 through 17 December 1969. However, by regulation, in order to qualify for the CIB, in addition to serving in combat with a qualifying unit, an enlisted soldier must have held an infantry MOS, which according to Army HRC awards officials included MOS 11B, 11C, 11F, 11G AND 11H. The evidence of record shows the applicant held and served in MOS 11E, performing duties as an armor...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120012823

    Original file (20120012823.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his record and DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). Item 31 (Foreign Service) of the applicant's DA Form 20 shows he served in the RVN from 21 January to 16 October 1968. Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013345

    Original file (20090013345.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). It allows, in effect, that upon the request of a Member of Congress, the Secretary concerned shall review a proposal for the award or presentation of a decoration (or the upgrading of a decoration), either for an individual or a unit, that is not otherwise authorized to be presented or awarded due to limitations established by law or policy for timely submission of a recommendation for such award or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003522

    Original file (20150003522.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 6 October 2015 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20150003522 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. He states the Board denied his request for award of the Purple Heart based on the available evidence. There is no evidence in the available records to show the applicant should be awarded the CIB.