Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013986
Original file (20090013986.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  14 January 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090013986 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) and that his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show that he was a specialist (SPC/E-4) or a sergeant (SGT/E-5).

2.  The applicant states, in effect, he was assigned to the 1st Squadron, 7th Cavalry, with a combat unit while he was in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) and never received his CIB.  He also states that his records should be corrected to show that he was a SPC or SGT at the time of his separation from active duty (AD).

3.  The applicant submitted his DD Form 214 in support of this application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, 

has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 2 December 1969.  He completed the required training and was awarded military occupational specialty 13B (Field Artillery Crewman).

3.  The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he served in the RVN with Battery B, 1st Battalion, 21st Artillery Regiment, 1st Cavalry Division from 8 June 1968 to 3 June 1969, performing duties in MOS 13B with principal duties as a cannoneer and with Battery A, 3rd Battalion, 18th Artillery Regiment, from 13 February 1971 to 23 November 1971, performing duties in MOS 13B with principal duties as a cannoneer.

4.  Headquarters, 23rd Infantry Division, Special Orders Number 157, dated        6 June 1971 show that the applicant was promoted to a SGT with an effective date 27 May 1971.

5.  On 24 August 1974, the applicant was found guilty by a special court-martial of four specifications of purchasing 16 bottles of alcohol from 1 December to 20 December 1974 and for one specification of transferring 15 bottles of alcohol to a male Korean national.  He was sentenced to a reduction to the rank/grade of specialist/E-4 and a forfeiture of $150.00 per month for 2 months.

6.  On 27 August 1974, the applicant was punished under Article 15 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) for failure to go at the prescribed time to his appointed place of duty.  His punishment included a reduction to the rank of private first class/E-3, forfeiture of $175.00 pay per month for 2 months, and 45 days of restriction.

7.  On 15 October 1975, the applicant was honorably discharged in the grade/rank of PFC/E-3.  He had completed 5 years, 10 months, and 13 days of active military service.  The DD Form 214 he was issued shows that he was awarded the Army Commendation Medal, Good Conduct Medal, National Defense Service Medal, Vietnam Service Medal, RVN Campaign Medal with Device (1960), Vietnam Cross of Gallantry with Palm, and the Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Machine Gun Bar.  The DD Form 214 he was issued does not show award of the CIB.


8.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, that the Combat Infantryman Badge is awarded to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer persons who have an infantry MOS.  They must have served in active ground combat while assigned or attached to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller size.  Additionally, appendix V of U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 (Decorations and Awards) provides that during the Vietnam era the Combat Infantryman Badge was awarded only to enlisted individuals who held and served in MOS 11B, 11C, 11D, 11F, 11G, or 11H.

9.  Army Regulation 635-5 prescribes the separation documents that are prepared for individuals upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army.  It establishes standardized policy for preparing and distributing these separation documents.  It states, in effect, that the active duty rank at the time of separation will be entered on the separation document.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  There is no evidence nor did the applicant submit any evidence that shows he held an infantry MOS during any of his assignments in the RVN.  Therefore, in the absence of such evidence he is not entitled to award of the CIB.

2.  The evidence of record shows that at the time of his separation on 15 October 1975, the applicant held the rank/grade of PFC/E-3.  Evidence of record shows although the applicant was appointed to the rank/grade SGT/E-5, he was subsequently reduced by special court martial to the rank/grade of SPC/E-4 and further reduced to the rank/grade of PFC/E-3.  Therefore, he in not entitled to correction of his records to show his rank as SPC/ E-4 or SGT/E-5 at the time of his separation.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  __X____  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      __________X___________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090013986



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009316

    Original file (20080009316.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Item 2 (Grade) shows the FSM held the rank of PFC and Item 3 (Date of Rank) shows 20 February 1969. Item 24 of the FSM's DD Form 214, as amended by a DD Form 215 (Correction to the DD Form 214) issued on 25 June 2007, shows the FSM earned the following awards during his active duty tenure: NDSM, BSM with "V" Device and 1st Oak Leaf Cluster, RVNCM, VSM, AM and CIB.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016180

    Original file (20100016180.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DD Form 214 for the period ending 2 February 1977 shows he was awarded the: * National Defense Service Medal * Vietnam Service Medal * Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) * Parachutist Badge * two Overseas Service Bars Item 19 (Indochina or Korea Service Since August 5, 1964) of his DD Form 214 shows the entry "x YES" "5MAY68-5MAY69." There is no evidence of record that shows the applicant was awarded an infantry MOS and that he served in an infantryman position. As a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110005512

    Original file (20110005512.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's DA Form 20 shows he served in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) from 1 February to 16 August 1969, while assigned to Company A, 1st Battalion, 46th Infantry Regiment as a “rifleman.” 5. Therefore, his records should be corrected to show these unit awards. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 27 August 1968 through 23 July 1971;...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002080617C070215

    Original file (2002080617C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that he be awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) and that his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show that he was awarded the Bronze Star Medal with "V" device. The applicant’s military records show that he was inducted on 12 December 1967. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that, in addition to the awards currently listed on his DD Form 214, the individual concerned...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050003460C070206

    Original file (20050003460C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 1 November 2005 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20050003460 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of the Bronze Star Medal and the Combat Infantryman Badge. The record further shows that based on his RVN service and campaign participation, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013345

    Original file (20090013345.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). It allows, in effect, that upon the request of a Member of Congress, the Secretary concerned shall review a proposal for the award or presentation of a decoration (or the upgrading of a decoration), either for an individual or a unit, that is not otherwise authorized to be presented or awarded due to limitations established by law or policy for timely submission of a recommendation for such award or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110024164

    Original file (20110024164 .txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states he was awarded the Purple Heart (PH) for wounds received in action on 27 April 1971, in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN), and was not awarded the CIB. Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) shows during his tenure with 1st Battalion, 506th Infantry, this unit was awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation for service from 1 March 1971 to 9 October 1971 based on Department of the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003349

    Original file (20110003349.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) lists the awards received by units serving in Vietnam. Although the applicant's record is void of specific evidence of his personal participation in active ground combat with his unit in the RVN, it does confirm he served as an infantryman in MOS 11C with a qualifying infantry unit during his tour of duty in the RVN. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010275

    Original file (20080010275.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that he is providing a certified copy of a BSM certificate that confirms he received this award while serving in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN), and is requesting to be awarded the CIB based on his qualifying infantry combat service in the RVN. The applicant's record contains Headquarters, United States Army Personnel Center, Oakland, California, Special Orders Number 338, dated 3 December 1968, which directed his relief from active duty (REFRAD) and transfer...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018280

    Original file (20110018280.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 38 (Record of Assignments) shows he received “excellent” conduct and efficiency ratings at all of his active duty assignments. Although the applicant's record is void of specific evidence of his personal participation in active ground combat with his unit in the RVN, it does confirm he served as an infantryman in MOS 11B with a qualifying infantry unit during his tour of duty in the RVN. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...