IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 15 January 2013
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120011949
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests, in effect, an exception to policy to the Post-9/11 GI Bill that will allow him to transfer his education benefits to his family members.
2. The applicant states, in effect, that he did not receive assistance or counseling to the effect that he had to transfer his education benefits before retiring.
3. The applicant provides exhibits A through E consisting of:
* Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) and Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) Proceedings
* A statement from a Soldier regarding the mortar attack on 25 August 2006 and his conversation with the applicant
* A copy of an email regarding the applicants discharge
* A copy of a bill for Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) premiums
* Line of Duty Determinations, commanders evaluation, retirement points statement, a copy of his automated record, and copies of chronological records of medical care
* A copy of Department of Defense Instruction (DODI) 1241.2
COUNSEL'S REQUEST, STATEMENT AND EVIDENCE:
1. Counsel requests, in effect, that the applicant be allowed to transfer his education benefits to his spouse.
2. Counsel states, in effect, that because of the circumstances surrounding the applicants disability retirement, he was not afforded proper pre-retirement counseling and assistance regarding his transfer of education benefits.
3. Counsel provides no additional documents with the application.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant enlisted in the Arizona Army National Guard (AZARNG) on 16 March 1982. He completed his training as a construction equipment repairman and continued to serve until he was discharged on 21 March 1988 and was transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) to complete his statutory service obligation. He was honorably discharged from the USAR on
21 March 1992.
2. He enlisted in the Nevada Army National Guard (NVARNG) on 15 February 2005 and on 1 April 2005 entered full-time active duty in the NVARNG as an Abrams Tank System Maintainer.
3. He deployed to Iraq from July 2006 to July 2007 in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom.
4. On 14 April 2011, a PEB was conducted at Fort Lewis, Washington and evaluated the following conditions:
a. Cervical disc fusion. This is not a battle injury and did not occur in a combat zone. Neck pain of several years duration during which Soldier underwent C5-C6 diskectomy and fusion. Symptoms have persisted despite therapy. Unfitting as Soldier cannot wear LBA, carry a combat load, or perform functional activities. Stable. Rated 10% for active forward flexion of 40 degrees IAW VASRD [Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities] 4.71a
b. Left Knee Chondromalacia Patella. This is not a battle injury and did not occur in a combat zone. MRI of left knee was normal. Soldier reports constant 4-5/10 pain that worsens with climbing or going down stairs. Examination shows tenderness to palpitation along the joint line and with collateral ligament tearing, and flexion of 140 degrees. Unfitting as Soldier cannot run, jump, carry a combat load, or perform functional activities. Stable. Rated 10% for painful motion of a major joint, that includes consideration of functional loss IAW VASRD paragraph 4.10. 4.40 and 4.59
5. The PEB found that the remainder of the diagnoses considered by the MEB were considered by the PEB and found to not be compensable. The PEB recommended that the applicant be granted permanent disability retirement with a 30% disability rating. It also determined that his disabilities did not result from a combat related injury as defined in Title 26, U.S. Code, Section 104.
6. On 28 April 2011, the applicant concurred with the findings and recommendations of the PEB and waived a formal hearing of his case.
7. On 16 May 2011, a letter was dispatched to the applicant notifying him that his PEB had been approved and he would be retired by reason of permanent disability with a 30% disability rating on 20 June 2011. He was also provided a DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Pay) and was advised to contact a Retirement Services Officer (RSO) from the list provided for assistance regarding his retirement and SBP counseling. He was further advised that officials at the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) could not process his retired pay benefits until the form was received.
8. On 20 June 2011, he was honorably discharged from the NVARNG and was transferred to the Retired Reserve.
9. A review of the available records failed to show evidence of the applicant attempting to transfer his Post9/11 GI Bill benefits.
10. During the processing of this case, a staff advisory opinion was obtained from the National Guard Bureau (NGB) which opined that the applicant was eligible to transfer his education benefits prior to his retirement and recommended that he be allowed to do so. The advisory opinion was provided to the applicant and he concurred with the opinion.
11. Public Law 110-252, section 3319, dated 22 June 2008, authorized the transfer of unused education benefits to family members. The law provided that the Secretary of Defense would prescribe the implementation of the program. It also provided that eligible participants must be serving as a member of the Armed Forces when the transfer is executed.
12. On 22 June 2009, the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense released Directive-Type Memorandum 09-003 Post-9/11 GI Bill that announced that individuals serving in the Armed Forces could effect a transfer of the GI Bill benefits effective 1 August 2009.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicants contentions and the opinion from the NGB have been noted. However, according to the applicable law and regulation, he is not eligible to transfer benefits under the Post-9/11 GI Bill transferability program. He retired from the Army on 20 June 2011 and there is no record of his transferring his educational benefits prior to his retirement. Unfortunately, there are no provisions in the law for retroactive eligibility that will allow him to transfer his benefits to his family members.
2. Additionally, the Departments of the Army, Defense, and Veterans Affairs initiated a massive public campaign plan that generated major communications through military, public, and social media venues. Information on the Post-9/11 GI Bill and subsequent transfer of entitlements was published well in advance of its implementation.
3. While the sincerity of the applicants claim that he was not informed that he had to be on active duty to complete a transfer of his benefits prior to retiring is not in question, the evidence submitted with his application and the evidence of record fails to support his claim. Therefore, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
____X___ ____X___ ___X__ _ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
_______ _ X ______ ___
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20120011949
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20120011949
4
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008311
Most, if not all of the applicant's medical records during his active duty service, with the exception of those provided by counsel, are not available for review with this case. There is no evidence in his service records and counsel provides insufficient evidence to show that at the time of his release from active duty the medical authorities at Fort Carson MEDDAC found him physically unfit to perform the duties require of his grade and MOS. At the time of his release from active duty,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011948
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Based on the foregoing, there is insufficient evidence to grant the applicant's request for terminating enrollment in the SBP in this case. However, he is not precluded from exercising his option to disenroll from the SBP with his wife's notarized concurrence during the 1-year period following the second anniversary of receipt of his retired pay without repayment of premiums.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020038
The applicant requests reconsideration of his earlier request for correction of his records to show he applied to transfer his educational benefits to his daughter under the transfer of educational benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill before he left active duty on 17 August 2010. Public Law 110-252, as amended by Public Law 111-377, identifies the qualification to receive the Post-9/11 GI Bill, one of which is the service member must have performed on or after 11 September 2001...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015376
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests transfer of educational benefits to her dependent children under the transfer of educational benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill. The policy further states the Secretaries of the Military Departments will provide active duty participants and members of the Reserve Components with qualifying active duty service, individual pre-separation or release from active duty counseling on the benefits under the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024460
BOARD DATE: 7 June 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100024460 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The policy states any member of the Armed Forces on or after 1 August 2009 who, at the time of the approval of the individuals request to transfer entitlement to educational assistance under this section, is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill and: a. has at least 6 years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election and agrees to serve 4 additional years in the Armed Forces from...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017431
The applicant states, in effect, he: * served in Iraq and Kuwait from 27 December 2002 to 24 November 2004 * was placed on active duty medical extension (ADME) after being injured * had five operations on his right shoulder and a laminectomy on his back involving the removal of two discs with instrumented fusion * was medically retired and placed on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) effective 16 January 2008 * was removed from the TDRL on 29 October 2009 and permanently retired *...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140006714
The PEB recommended he be placed on the permanent disability retired list (PDRL) with a 50 percent disability rating. There is no evidence that shows the applicant was counseled on his eligibility to transfer his educational benefits to his family members at the time he was placed on the TDRL on 3 August 2009. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing the applicant filed his application and the Army...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021745
The applicant requests correction of his records to show he applied to transfer his educational benefits to his daughter under the transfer of educational benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill before he left active duty on 17 August 2010. Service members must have served on active duty in the Regular Army or as a Reserve member ordered to active duty under Title 10, U.S. Code, sections 688, 12301(a), 12301(d), 12301(g), 12302, or 12304 (orders in support of contingency...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110002226
Army and Department of Defense (DOD) policy require a Soldier to be on active duty or a member of the Selected Reserve in order to transfer benefits. The evidence of record shows he was not fully eligible to transfer his education benefits under the TEB prior to his retirement on 27 April 2010. The applicant did not have 10 years of service; or c. be retirement eligible.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022789
He was placed on the TDRL on 9 December 2009 and he did not transfer his educational benefits prior to his retirement. The applicant has provided no evidence to support his contention that he not advised regarding his education benefits or that he was improperly advised regarding his eligibility for the Post 9-11 GI Bill Transferability Program. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in...