Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011681
Original file (20120011681.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:  10 January 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120011681 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests appropriate action be taken to promote him to lieutenant colonel (LTC) in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR).

2.  The applicant states he was considered and recommended for promotion to LTC by the Department of the Army Reserve Promotion Selection Board in October 1962.  The memorandum for record confirming this information was found in his personnel record. 

3.  The applicant provides:

* A copy of the memorandum for record, dated 13 August 1963
* A binder titled "History of the 43rd Ordnance Bomb Disposal Squad - World War II Europe"

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's records show he entered military service in Philadelphia, PA, on 1 April 1941 and served as a corporal.  He was honorably discharged on 23 July 1943 at Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD.

3.  He was appointed as a Reserve commissioned officer of the Army and entered active duty on 24 July 1943.  He served in Europe during World War II as a bomb disposal officer.  He was honorably released from active duty in the rank of captain on 27 March 1946 and he was transferred to the USAR.  

4.  He was called from his Reserve status and entered active duty on 16 October 1947.  He served in a variety of stateside or overseas assignments and he was appointed to the temporary rank of major (MAJ) in the Army of the United Sates (AUS) on 8 May 1953 and promoted to the permanent rank of MAJ in the USAR on 5 August 1955.

5.  He was honorably released from active duty on 31 December 1957 at the expiration of his active duty commitment due to disapproval of his extension of service request.  He reverted back to the USAR - Pennsylvania Military District.

6.  He enlisted in the Regular Army on 1 January 1958 and he reenlisted on 1 January 1961.  He attained the rank/grade of sergeant (SGT)/E-5.

7.  On 18 January 1962, by letter, Headquarters, Department of the Army (HQDA) notified him that he was considered for promotion to LTC by the 16 October 1961 DA USAR Selection Board, in accordance with Army Regulation 135-155 (Promotion of Commissioned Officers and Warrant Officers Other Than General Officers), but he was not selected for promotion.  The letter informed him that:

* This non-selection constituted his first non-selection and that he would be considered by the next selection/second board
* If selected by the second board, his promotion would be one year later than it would have been if he had been selected the first time
* If not selected, he would be discharged or transferred to the Retired Reserve, if eligible

8.  On 23 July 1962, he submitted a request for voluntary retirement and transfer to the Retired Reserve effective 30 September 1962 or as soon as practicable.  However, prior to issuing orders, he was advised by DA to consider a delay in retirement until 1 November 1962 in order for additional incremental retired pay.  He agreed.

9.  He retired on 31 October 1962 and was placed on the Retired List in the rank/grade of SGT/E-5 on 1 November 1962.  He was credited with completing 20 years, 3 months, and 9 days of creditable active service.

10.  On 13 August 1963, HQDA notified him that he was considered for promotion to LTC by the 22 October 1962 DA USAR Selection Board, in accordance with Army Regulation 135-155 and he was selected for promotion.  However, promotion action could not be taken because he had transferred to the Retired Reserve which was prior to his eligibility date of 23 July 1963. 

11.  Army Regulation 135-155 prescribes procedures for selection for promotion of officers of the Reserve components.  The version in effect at the time states:

	a.  Consideration for a non-unit officer (and unit officer if not earlier promoted) for promotion to the next higher grade is mandatory upon his meeting the time in grade and total years of service requirements whichever occurs later.  For promotion consideration to LTC, the requirement is 7 years in the grade of MAJ and 17 total years of service.

	b.  The effective date of promotion of a member selected after being passed over on a first consideration will be 1 year later than the original promotion eligibility date (this does not apply for promotion to colonel).

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant served in the USAR as a commissioned officer with multiple periods of active service.  He was appointed to the temporary grade of MAJ in the AUS on 8 May 1953.  His eligibility date for promotion to MAJ in the USAR was 25 July 1955 and he was promoted to the permanent grade of MAJ in the USAR on 5 August 1955.  

2.  Based on 7 tears time in grade as a MAJ (25 July 1955), his promotion eligibility date to LTC was 25 July 1962.  He was considered for promotion to LTC by the October 1961 Reserve selection board but he was not selected for promotion.  This was considered his first non-selection.  He was advised that he would be considered by a second board and if selected by the second board, his promotion would be one year later than it would have been if he had been selected by the first board. 

3.  The following year, he requested voluntary retirement and was honorably retired on 31 October 1962 and placed on the Retired List on 1 November 1962.  

4.  While his retirement application was in motion, he was considered a second time for promotion to LTC by the October 1962 Reserve selection board.  This board selected him for promotion.  The regulation in effect at the time stipulated that the effective date of promotion of a member selected after being passed over on a first consideration will be 1 year later than the original promotion eligibility date.  

5.  The original promotion eligibility date was 25 July 1962 but was adjusted to 25 July 1963 because he had already been passed over once.  However, no promotion action could have been effected in his case because by then, he had already transferred to the Retired Reserve.  Therefore, he is not entitled to the requested relief. 

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ____X___  ___X__ _  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _  X ______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120011681





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120011681



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040007934C070208

    Original file (20040007934C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Powers | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. Army Regulation 135-155 (Reserve Components Promotion of Commissioned Officers other than General Officers), dated 20 December 1960, paragraph 11 (Eligibility for promotion), subparagraph e(2) stated that, effective 1 January 1962, LTCs and majors of all branches must have successfully completed or received constructive or equivalent credit for the Regular or Associate...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059682C070421

    Original file (2001059682C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT STATES : In effect, that he was denied promotion to LTC in the USAR because: 1) there are two dates on his record for appointment as a second lieutenant (2LT), USAR, 14 June 1951, which is the correct one, and 23 October 1952, which caused error in computing promotion eligibility dates; 2) he was not promoted to first lieutenant (1LT), USAR, until 13 May 1955, 47...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020952

    Original file (20120020952.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was placed in the Retired Reserve after being twice non-selected for promotion to LTC only 4 years after being promoted to MAJ. Army Regulation 135-155 (Promotion of Commissioned Officers and Warrant Officers other Than General Officers) specifies that MAJ to LTC mandatory boards occur when an officer reaches 7 years TIG. d. ABCMR Docket Number AR20060014854, dated 17 January 2007, pertaining to his selection to MAJ by the SSB 2005SS12R7 adjourning on 4 November 2005 indicates the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019807

    Original file (20130019807.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    If he were selected, he could potentially be promoted to LTC and his MRD would change to allow him to serve until 28 years of commissioned service, establishing his MRD as 31 August 2017. c. If not selected, he must transfer to the Retired Reserve or be separated effective 31 August 2013. However, the board results were released on 3 October 2013, after his MRD of 31 August 2013. Although he was selected for promotion to LTC by the FY13 DA promotion selection board, he could not be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070013559

    Original file (20070013559.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant contends if he had been promoted to LTC with a date of rank of 24 June 1983, it would have given him the time in grade and the active duty service requirement to retire in the grade of LTC. The opinion continues that the applicant's promotion eligibility date to LTC was 23 September 1989, however, he was appointed a warrant officer on 24 June 1988 and was not eligible for promotion consideration to LTC. Additionally, the applicant contends that his records should show he was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018195

    Original file (20140018195.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 16 October 1974, by letter, Headquarters, First U.S. Army notified the applicant that his records were considered for promotion to LTC by an RCSB that convened on 3 June 1974 in accordance with Army Regulation 135-155 (Promotion of Commissioned Officers and Warrant Officers Other Than General Officers) but he was not selected for promotion. The letter stated: * Selection boards are not permitted to divulge the reason for their selection or non-selection; therefore, unless you had not...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008772

    Original file (20080008772.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 135-155 also states, in pertinent part, that an active duty officer, who is selected for promotion but removed from the ADL and placed in an active Reserve status prior to promotion, is not eligible for that promotion and that officer will be placed on the RASL and considered for promotion by a Reserve promotion board. With respect to the applicant's consideration for promotion to LTC by a Special Selection Board, there is no evidence in the applicant’s records and the...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080014888

    Original file (AR20080014888.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 19 October 1961, the applicant was transferred to the United States Army Reserve (USAR) in the rank of CPT. On 24 March 1970, the applicant was promoted to lieutenant colonel (LTC) in the USAR and his record shows this is the highest rank he attained and in which he served during his military service. Although the current regulation was not applicable during the period the applicant served, promotion policy has always required an officer to be identified for promotion through a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002975

    Original file (20140002975.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He stated he is asking the Board to amend his date of rank (DOR) for LTC based on the fact that had he not been deployed several times he would have been able to complete ILE and would have been considered for promotion by the FY 2010 LTC PSB. c. The message stated a military education waiver could be granted for officers being considered in or above the primary zone of consideration if they had served 12 or more cumulative months of documented deployment outside of the continental United...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011865

    Original file (20130011865.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    g. AR20110002949 ROP, dated 1 March 2011, which shows the Board recommended granting the individual concerned a military education waiver and promotion reconsideration by a special selection board (SSB) for promotion to LTC, which was a supplemental to an earlier case and in which the Board corrected that applicant’s records to show he was granted a military education waiver. The Board granted him an education waiver as a result of him not being promoted to MAJ in a timely manner which thus...