Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011225
Original file (20120011225.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  17 January 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120011225 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) to show he held the rank/pay grade of corporal (CPL)/E-4.

2.  He states:

* his discharge records do not show his correct rank
* in preparation for burial, he wants a DD Form 214 showing he was a CPL/E-4
* he was promoted to CPL/E-4 on 31 July 1956 while he was serving in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR)

3.  The applicant provides:

* DD Form 214
* Certificate of Military Service
* Honorable Discharge Certificate

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States and entered active duty on 22 February 1951.

3.  On 22 February 1953, he was released from active duty and transferred to the USAR.  Item 3 (Grade-Rate-Rank and Date of Appointment) of his DD Form 214 shows he held the rank of private first class (PFC) (temporary) with a date of rank of 7 August 1952.

4.  He submitted an Honorable Discharge Certificate which shows he held the rank of CPL on 21 July 1956, the date he was discharged from the Army of the United States.  It does not show his date of rank.

5.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) Army Regulation 635-5 prescribes the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army.  It establishes standardized policy for the preparation of the DD Form 214.  It states the DD Form 214 is a synopsis of the Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty.  It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge.

6.  Army Regulation 635-5, paragraph 2-4 (Completing the DD Form 214), contains item-by-item instructions for completing the DD Form 214.  The instructions for completing item 3 state the active duty grade, rate, or rank and date of appointment at the time of separation will be entered on the DD Form 214.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

The applicant held the rank/pay grade PFC/E-3 with a date of rank of 2 August 1952 on the date of his release from active duty.  He indicated he was promoted to CPL/E-4 on 31 July 1956, more than 3 years after the completion of his active duty service.  The DD Form 214 is only a record of service as of the date of separation from active duty.  His DD Form 214 correctly shows his rank/pay grade as of the date he was released from active duty.


BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ____X___  ____X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ____________X_____________
                   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120011225



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120011225



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011486

    Original file (20090011486.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Contrary to the applicant’s belief that his DD Form 214 was reconstructed, the evidence of record shows that the applicant was issued two DD Forms 214 during his military service. With respect to the applicant’s rank at time of entry on active duty, the evidence of record shows that at the time of his induction and entry on active duty, the applicant held the rank/grade of PVT/E-1 which is correctly shown in item 18 of his first DD Form 214. With respect to his rank/grade at the time of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130001722

    Original file (20130001722.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant states he was a SGT at the time of his discharge from the U.S. Army Reserve; however, his discharge certificate shows he was a CPL. The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) * a certificate of promotion, dated 6 June 1955 * DD Form 256A (Honorable Discharge Certificate), dated 20 March 1956 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110006623

    Original file (20110006623.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review. These orders show his grade as CPL. Since there is no evidence that shows he was reduced in rank at any time after 21 January 1954, the orders provided by the applicant which show his rank as CPL are accepted as sufficient evidence in which to correct item 3 of his DD Form 214 to show his rank as CPL.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023587

    Original file (20110023587.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) as follows: * Item 3 (Grade - Rate - Rank and Date of Appointment) to show he was appointed as a corporal (CPL) on 12 October 1952 instead of 1953 * Item 8 (Reason and Authority for Separation) to, in effect, list the correct date * Item 38 (Remarks) to show his permanent grade as private first class (PFC) instead of private (PV2) 2. Item 3 of the DD Form 214 shows the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003551

    Original file (20090003551.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Item 3 of the DD Form 214 shows the grade held at the time of separation. The applicant contends that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show his grade as that of S/Sgt.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005575

    Original file (20140005575.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's complete military records are not available to the Board for review. Item 3 of the DD Form 214 shows the grade and date of rank of the grade held at the time of separation. The evidence of record shows the applicant served on active duty from 4 October 1954 to 24 September 1957.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008697

    Original file (20120008697.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) to show: * his rank as corporal (CPL) (permanent) * he completed the Airborne Infantry School and Geneva Conventions of 1949 training 2. There is no evidence of record and he provided insufficient evidence to show he never served as a labor foreman during his period of service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005359

    Original file (20120005359.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) to show his rank/grade as that of at least corporal (CPL)/E-4. The applicant's military record is not available to the Board for review.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020326

    Original file (20130020326.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states his DD Form 214 does not list his completion of 21 weeks of the Wire Electronic Repairman Course and does not show his temporary appointment to the rank of CPL. He has no evidence and the Army has all the records. The applicant’s complete military records are not available to the Board for review.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120012396

    Original file (20120012396.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * Letter, National Personnel Records Center (NPRC), dated 17 May 2012 * Standard Form (SF) 180 (Request Pertaining to Military Records), dated 30 April 2012 * DD Form 214 * Self-authored statement * Certificate of Completion, NCO Academy, dated 10 October 1952 * Certification of Military Service CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Unfortunately, his records do not contain a promotion recommendation or promotion orders for SGT. _______ _ X ______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify...