Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010952
Original file (20120010952.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	    24 January 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120010952 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests approval to transfer 12 months of his educational benefits to his dependent son under the Transfer of Educational Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill.

2.  The applicant states he was deployed in support of Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF) from 30 August 2009 to 5 December 2010, leaving only 1 and 1/2 months until his mandatory retirement on 18 January 2011.  He did not have access to the Defense Enrollment Eligibility Reporting System (DEERS) or the Department of Defense (DOD) website to correct his dependent listing.  Due to a glitch in the system, he was not afforded the opportunity for corrections until he returned to the United States.  His understanding was that as he is a Vietnam and OEF veteran, he can combine his education bills for a total of 48 months.  He used approximately 36 months of his Vietnam-era education benefits, leaving him with 12 months of benefits.  He wants to transfer his benefits to his son AM, date of birth (DOB) 27 December 1987.  His son was 21 years of age as of 31 August 2009.

3.  The applicant provides no additional evidence.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant was born on 1 December 1950.  Having had prior active service, the applicant's records show he enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) on 1 July 1973.  He served in staff and leadership positions and he attained the rank/grade of sergeant first class (SFC)/E-7 on 1 June 1999.
2.  His records contain a DD Form 93, dated 18 July 2009, wherein it shows the applicant was married and had four children.  This form confirms his youngest son, AM, was born on 27 December 1987.  Therefore, this son would have turned 21 years of age on 27 December 2008.  

3.  The applicant was ordered to active duty as a member of his USAR unit in support of OEF and he entered active duty on 22 September 2009.  He served in Afghanistan from 2 November 2009 to 14 September 2010.

4.  He was honorably released from active duty on 5 December 2010.

5.  Orders P04-943794, dated 13 April 2011, issued by the U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC), retired him from the USAR and placed him on the Retired List effective 19 January 2011.

6.  In the processing of this case, an advisory opinion, dated 26 July 2012, was received from the Chief, Educational Incentives Branch, HRC.  The advisory official recommended disapproval of the applicant's request and stated that Public Law 110-552 establishes legal limitations on the transferability of unused Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits and limits eligibility to members of the Armed Forces who are serving on active duty or as a member of the Selected Reserve on or after 1 August 2009.

	a.  A Soldier may only transfer benefits to eligible family members.  To be considered an eligible family member the spouse or child must be enrolled in the DEERS and be eligible for DEERS benefits.  Children lose eligible family member status upon turning age 21 or at marriage.  Eligible family member status can be extended from age 21 to age 23 only if the child is enrolled as a full-time student and unmarried (verified by DEERS).  (Emphasis added)  Once the benefits are transferred, children may use the benefits up to age 26.

	b.  The TEB online database shows the applicant had one eligible family member enrolled in DEERS, his spouse.  He was eligible to transfer benefits only to his spouse.  However, he did not complete the TEB online data base because he claims he was not aware of the requirement to transfer prior to leaving the service.

	c.  A Soldier should not be granted relief based on unawareness of law, program rules, or procedures unless they left the service during the implementation phase (first 90 days) of the program.  The Army, DOD, and the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) initiated a massive public campaign plan that generated major communications through military, public, and social media venues on the Post-9/11 GI Bill and subsequent transfer of educational benefits.  The applicant's last day in service was 18 January 2011, which was not within 90 days after the program's implementation.

	d.  A Soldier must initially request the transfer through the DOD TEB online database.  The TEB database was operational on 29 June 2009.  Once approved in the TEB database, the information is automatically relayed to the VA.  The respective dependent must then submit the application for VA educational benefits.  The applicant did not take any steps to transfer education benefits.

7.  In a response to the advisory opinion received on 17 September 2012, the applicant stated:

	a.  When the TEB online database became operational on 29 June 2009, his unit was already in activation status and he was engaged in non-deskbound training, remote from access to the TEB system.  In addition, his unit fulfilled the OEF mission on 5 December 2010, leaving him less than 2 months before his involuntary, mandatory retirement on 18 January 2011 at age 60.

	b.  The advisory opinion states "Children lose eligible family member status upon turning age 21…Eligible family member status can be extended from age 21 to age 23…"  He is not declaring ignorance of the requirements, he is contending he could not tabulate his son for eligibility because his name defaulted out of DEERS at age 21.

8.  On 22 June 2009, DOD established the criteria for eligibility and transfer of unused educational benefits to eligible family members.  The policy states any member of the Armed Forces on or after 1 August 2009 who, at the time of the approval of the individual’s request to transfer entitlement to educational assistance under this section, is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill and meets other criteria.

9.  Public Law 110-252, section 3020, limits eligibility to transfer unused benefits to those members of the Armed Forces who are serving on active duty or as a member of the Selected Reserve on or after 1 August 2009.  A Soldier must be on active duty or a member of the Selected Reserve at the time of transfer of educational benefits to his/her dependent.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends he should be allowed to transfer 12 months of his Post-9/11 GI Bill educational benefits to his dependent son because he did not have access to update DEERS once his son turned 21 years of age.

2.  The evidence of record shows the applicant was transferred to the Retired List on 19 January 2011.  His records show he was eligible to transfer any unused education benefits to only one dependent, his spouse; however, he did not do so while he was serving on active duty or in the USAR.

3.  Notwithstanding his sincerity, although he was deployed to Afghanistan from 2 November 2009 to 14 September 2010 and may not have had direct access to the online database, there is no evidence that shows he attempted to transfer any of his education benefits prior to his deployment, after his return in September 2010, or anytime up to his last day of service in the Selected Reserve on 18 January 2011.  The applicant stated he was aware of the requirements to do so. 

4.  In addition, although eligible family member status can be extended from age 21 to age 23, it is extended only if the child is enrolled as a full-time student and unmarried (verified by DEERS).  There is no evidence, and the applicant did not provide any evidence, that shows his youngest son was a full-time student and unmarried after reaching age 21, or that he attempted to add him to DEERS after age 21, which occurred in December 2008, about 6 months before his unit entered activation status.

5.  The requirement to transfer the benefits to an eligible dependent while a member is on active duty or in the Selected Reserve is embedded in the law and a change to this law is not within the purview of this Board.  As his youngest son was not an eligible dependent, and the applicant failed to transfer the benefits to his only eligible dependent, his spouse, while in an active status, as required by law, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis for granting his requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X___  ___X____  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________X____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120009844



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120010952



5


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004799

    Original file (20140004799.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows the applicant submitted a request to transfer his education benefits under the TEB on 29 October 2009, which is within 90 days of the implementation of the program. Therefore, it would be equitable to correct his records to show he transferred the remaining balance of his educational benefits under the Post-9/11 GI Bill TEB Program to his youngest son. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009844

    Original file (20120009844.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests approval to transfer 1 month of her educational benefits to two additional dependent children, J____ M____ and A____ M____, under the Transfer of Educational Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill. The evidence of record shows the applicant was transferred to the Retired Reserve on 1 April 2010. It is apparent she was aware of the requirement to request TEB through the DOD TEB online database prior to her transfer to the Retired Reserve as she transferred...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004291

    Original file (20120004291.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He would have been eligible to transfer the benefit to two of his four dependents. The applicant had more than 27 years of service upon retirement; therefore, he was eligible to transfer to two of his four dependents. The Transfer of Education (TEB) online database shows the applicant had four dependents enrolled in DEERS as of 29 February 2012, his last day in service; however, two dependents were ineligible to receive benefits in DEERS.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004423

    Original file (20140004423.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Since you are now in a retired status, you cannot allocate months to dependents that did not have benefits transferred to them before your retirement. A Soldier must have at least 6 years of eligible service in order to transfer educational benefits to a spouse and at least 10 years of eligible service to transfer to eligible children.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003158

    Original file (20120003158.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests transfer of his educational benefits under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill to his dependents. The applicant had over 24 years of service upon his retirement so he was eligible to transfer the benefit to either his spouse or child if he had completed the request before he left the service. There is no evidence in his record and the applicant has not provided any evidence that shows he attempted to transfer benefits prior to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021979

    Original file (20130021979.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His record does not contain any documentation that indicates he transferred, or attempted to transfer, his education benefits under the TEB provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill, prior to his date of retirement. c. A Soldier may only transfer to eligible dependents. On 22 June 2009, DOD established the criteria for eligibility and transfer of unused educational benefits to eligible family members.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019931

    Original file (20130019931.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A Soldier must have at least 6 years of eligible service in order to transfer educational benefits to a spouse and at least 10 years of eligible service to transfer benefits to eligible children. The applicant's request to correct her record to show she was eligible to transfer her Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to her son has been carefully considered. The available evidence appears to show the applicant was fully eligible to transfer benefits to her eligible dependents; however, there is...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020756

    Original file (20120020756.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states he gave 50 percent of his Post-9/11 GI Bill to his son; however, after he turned the form in to his personnel section it was never processed, presumably due to his unit deploying. There is no evidence in the applicant's records and the applicant provided no evidence to show he had taken action to transfer benefits to his son prior to retiring from service. On 22 June 2009, the Department of Defense (DOD) established the criteria for eligibility and transfer of unused...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000223

    Original file (20150000223.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * there is not much he can give his children who followed him during their growing-up years and had to be uprooted during high school because he was again being transferred * receiving the educational benefits is one small way he can demonstrate his appreciation for the sacrifices they made during his career * he elected to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependents at the time it was first authorized in June 2009 because he already had a master's degree...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012606

    Original file (20140012606.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show he elected to transfer education benefits to his dependent child under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill. The applicant requests that he be allowed to transfer his educational benefits under the TEB provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill to his dependent son. Since there is no evidence that shows the applicant attempted to transfer the benefit while in an active status, as required by...