Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010535
Original file (20120010535.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:  4 December 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120010535 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart (PH).  

2.  The applicant states he was wounded in action in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) in June “1968” when he fell into a punji stick booby trap and broke his right ankle.  

3.  The applicant provides no documentary evidence in support of his request.  

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.



2.  On 18 April 1968, the applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States.  He was trained in and awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 63C (Wheel Vehicle Mechanic).  His record shows he was promoted to sergeant (SGT)/E-5 on 28 February 1970, and that this is the highest rank he attained while serving on active duty.  

3.  The applicant’s DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he served in the RVN 16 September 1968 to 6 September 1969.  Item 40 (Wounds) is blank, and the PH is not included in the list of awards entered in item 41 (Awards and Decorations).  

4.  The applicant’s Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) is void of orders or other documents indicating he was awarded the PH by proper authority while serving on active duty.  It is also void of any documents and/or medical treatment records showing he was wounded in action or that he was treated for a combat-related wound by medical personnel while serving in the RVN.  

5.  On 17 April 1970, the applicant was honorably released from active duty.  The DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) he was issued at the time shows he completed 2 years active military service.  It also shows that during his active duty tenure he earned the following awards: 

* National Defense Service Medal
* Vietnam Service Medal
* RVN Campaign Medal with Device 60
* Army Good Conduct Medal
* Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar
* “VCOP V” 

6.  A review of The Adjutant General's Office, Casualty Division's Vietnam casualty listing does not show the applicant's name as a casualty.

7.  A review of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System, an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the U.S. Army Human Resources Command failed to reveal an award of the PH pertaining to the applicant.



8.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) contains the Army’s awards policy.  Paragraph 2-8 contains guidance on the PH.  It states in order to support 
award of the PH there must be evidence that the wound for which the award is being made was received as a result of enemy action; that it required treatment by military medical personnel; and a record of the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s request for award of the PH has been carefully considered.  However, there is insufficient evidence to support his request. 

2.  By regulation, in order to support award of the PH there must be evidence the wound for which the award is being made was received as a result of enemy action, the wound required treatment by medical personnel, and a record of the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record. 

3.  The evidence of record is void of any entries or documents that indicate the applicant was wounded in action or treated for a combat related wound while serving in the RVN.  Item 40 of his DA Form 20 is blank, which indicates he was not wounded in action.  Further, there is no entry on the Vietnam casualty listing, the official DA list of RVN casualties, pertaining to the applicant.  

4.  Absent any evidence of record confirming the applicant was wounded as a result of enemy action or medical treatment records showing he was treated for a combat related wound by military medical personnel in the RVN, the regulatory burden of proof necessary to support award of the PH has not been satisfied in this case.  

5.  The applicant and all others concerned to know that this action related to award of the PH in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by the applicant in service to our Nation.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.  

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ____X___  ___X__ _  DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _  X ______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120010535



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120010535



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011344

    Original file (20120011344.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). It states in order to support award of the PH there must be evidence that the wound for which the award is being made was received as a result of enemy action; that it required treatment by military medical personnel; and a record of the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record. The applicant’s request for award of the PH has been carefully considered.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120012044

    Original file (20120012044.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DD Form 214 he was issued at the time shows he completed 2 years of active military service. It states in order to support award of the PH there must be evidence that the wound for which the award is being made was received as a result of enemy action; that it required treatment by military medical personnel; and a record of the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record. By regulation, in order to support award of the PH there must be evidence the wound for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004975

    Original file (20120004975.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant’s Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) is void of orders or other documents indicating he was awarded the PH by proper authority while serving on active duty. Although the record contains indications the applicant suffered from shoulder problems while serving on active duty, there is no evidence of record or independent evidence provided by the applicant confirming that this...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080001949

    Original file (20080001949.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides the following documents in support of his application: Enlistment Record (DD Form 4); Enlisted Qualification Record (DA Form 20); promotion and award orders; Report of Medical Examination (SF 88), dated 20 September 1965; Report of Medical History (SF 89), dated 20 September 1965; Military Medical Record treatment records; and separation document (DD Form 214). Absent any evidence of record confirming the applicant was wounded in action or treated for a combat-related...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004147

    Original file (20090004147.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). However, by regulation, in order to support award of the PH there must be evidence that the wound for which the award is being made was received as a result of enemy action; that the wound required treatment by military medical personnel; and a record of this medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013208

    Original file (20080013208.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, by regulation, in order to support award of the PH, there must be evidence confirming that the wound for which the award is being made was received as a direct result of or was caused by enemy action, that the wound required treatment by military medical personnel, and a record of this treatment must have been made a matter of official record. In addition, there are no medical treatment records on file confirming he was ever treated for a combat related wound or injury, and his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016643

    Original file (20080016643.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). It states, in pertinent part, that in order to support award of the PH there must be evidence that the wound for which the award is being made was received as a result of enemy action; that the wound required treatment by military medical personnel; and a record of this medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record. However, by regulation, in order to support award of the PH...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006778

    Original file (20090006778.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 40 of the applicant's DA Form 20 is blank, which indicates he was never wounded in action, and the PH is also not included in the list of awards contained in Item 41. As a result, absent any evidence of record confirming the applicant was wounded in action or treated for a combat-related wound while serving in the RVN, the regulatory burden of proof necessary to support award of the PH has not been satisfied in this case 3. In order to justify correction of a military record the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005588

    Original file (20120005588.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). It is also void of any documents showing he was wounded in action in the RVN or that he was treated for a combat-related wound by medical personnel while serving in the RVN. It states in order to support award of the PH there must be evidence that the wound for which the award is being made was received as a result of enemy action; that it required treatment by military medical personnel; and a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004005

    Original file (20120004005.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). It states in order to support award of the PH there must be evidence that the wound for which the award is being made was received as a result of enemy action; that it required treatment by military medical personnel; and a record of the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record. By regulation, in order to support award of the PH there must be evidence the wound for which...