Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010056
Original file (20120010056.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		

		BOARD DATE:	  13 December 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120010056 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, his name and address be changed on his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States). 

2.  The applicant states:

* His correct name is "J---- L. T---- - C-----"
* His correct address is an address in Coto Laurel, Puerto Rico

3.  The applicant provides:

* United States Uniformed Services Identification Card
* Honorable Discharge Certificate
* DD Form 214

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's military records covering his active duty service from 
3 September 1953 to 12 August 1955 are not available.  

3.  His DD Form 214 shows he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 3 September 1953 and he was released from active duty on 12 August 1955. 

4.  Item 1 (Last Name, First Name, Middle Name) of his DD Form 214 shows his name as "J---- L. T---- - C-----."  Item 20 (Home Address at Time of Entry Into Active Service) shows an address in Villalba, Puerto Rico.  Item 47 (Permanent Address for Mailing Purposes After Separation) shows the entry "Same as item #20."    

5.  He subsequently served in the U.S. Army Reserve and Army National Guard.  His National Guard Bureau Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) shows his name as "J---- L. T---- - C-----" and a mailing address in Villalba, Puerto Rico.  

6.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army.  It establishes standardized policy for the preparation of the DD Form 214 and states that the DD Form 214 is a synopsis of the Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty.  It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends his name is incorrect on his DD Form 214 and his correct name is "J---- L. T---- - C-----."   However, this is the name shown on his DD Form 214.  Therefore, there appears to be no error on his DD Form 214 to correct.

2.  The applicant contends his correct address is an address in Coto Laurel, Puerto Rico.  The DD Form 214 is a snapshot in time and is a reflection of the applicant's record of Active Army service at the time of his release from active duty.  Evidence shows his home address was Villalba, Puerto Rico at the time of his separation in 1955.  Since it appears his address changed after he was released from active duty, there is no basis for granting his request to change his address on his DD Form 214.
BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x____  ___x___  ___x_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _ x  _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120010056



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120010056



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068497C070402

    Original file (2002068497C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his records be corrected to show that he was honorably discharged in the rank of private first class (PFC). The applicant states that he was discharged in the rank of private/E-2 but had been promoted to the rank of PFC on 26 July 1954. RECOMMENDATION : That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the individual concerned was REFRAD on 20 January 1955, in the temporary rank and pay grade of PFC E-3 (T), with an...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002394

    Original file (20120002394.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 27 September 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120002394 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in Item 33 (Record of Assignments) the applicant: a. entered the basic combat training course at Fort Chafee, on 22 November 1955; b. entered advanced individual training at Fort Lewis, on 15 February 1956; c. was assigned to the 9th Infantry Regiment at Fort Lewis on 21 April 1956 with duty as an ammunition...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013670

    Original file (20080013670.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-5 (Personnel Separations), in effect at the time, established uniform administrative procedures and separation forms to be used in connection with the relief from active duty or complete separation of enlisted and warrant/commissioned officer personnel. If the grade at the time of separation was not permanent, the permanent grade, date of appointment, and date of rank if different from the date of appointment is entered in item 38. The evidence of record shows that the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009735

    Original file (20080009735.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130006335

    Original file (20130006335.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant's military records and medical records are not available to the Board for review. _______ _ X ______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015060

    Original file (20060015060.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his military records be corrected to show the name G*****o C*****o-V*****z instead of P***o C*****o-V*****z. The birth certificate provided by the applicant shows the name G*****o C*****o-V*****z, however, this document cannot be validated and is insufficient to amend the applicant's military records. The Board determined that the evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023587

    Original file (20110023587.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) as follows: * Item 3 (Grade - Rate - Rank and Date of Appointment) to show he was appointed as a corporal (CPL) on 12 October 1952 instead of 1953 * Item 8 (Reason and Authority for Separation) to, in effect, list the correct date * Item 38 (Remarks) to show his permanent grade as private first class (PFC) instead of private (PV2) 2. Item 3 of the DD Form 214 shows the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060005732C070205

    Original file (20060005732C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Accordingly, it would be in the interest of justice to correct his records at this time to show his award of the Purple Heart. Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or injustice now under consideration on 23 December 1952; therefore, the time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on 22 December 1955. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050000561C070206

    Original file (20050000561C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his military records to show award of the Purple Heart, the Bronze Star Medal, and “other decorations.” 2. The applicant requested correction of his records to show award of the Bronze Star Medal. The evidence shows that the applicant’s record contains administrative error that does not require action by the Board.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040002616C070208

    Original file (20040002616C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Curtis Greenway | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or injustice now under consideration on 9 August 1955; therefore, the time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on 8 August 1958. Therefore, there is insufficient basis to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing or for correction of...