Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009616
Original file (20120009616.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  15 January 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120009616 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant, the former spouse of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests, in effect, that the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) election made by the deceased FSM be changed from spouse coverage to former spouse coverage. 

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that the FSM failed to comply with a court order to convert his SBP from spouse coverage to former spouse coverage after their   marriage was dissolved.  She further states the FSM did not attend any of the divorce proceedings and all paperwork was sent to him through certified mail.  He failed to respond to any of them.  She also states that she was under the impression that he would comply with the divorce decree and change her status to former spouse but he never did and he stopped communicating with her.  She also states that she learned of his death from other individuals.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of a letter from the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS), a copy of her Verification for Survivor Annuity, a copy of the FSM’s death certificate, and a copy of her divorce decree.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The FSM's military records show that he retired from the Regular Army on
28 February 1993 after completing 20 years of active duty service.  In conjunction with his retirement, the FSM completed a DA Form 4240 (Data for Payment of Retired Army Personnel) on 10 December 1992.  Part V (SBP Election) of this document shows that he was married to the applicant at the time, and he elected SBP spouse and children coverage at a reduced amount of $507.50.  This document also shows the applicant agreed to the reduced amount on the same date. 

2.  On 8 November 2004, the FSM and the applicant divorced.  Their divorce decree shows the FSM was ordered to name the applicant as his irrevocable SBP former spouse beneficiary.  This document also stated, in effect, that the applicant, as the former spouse, had permission to contact DFAS herself regarding SBP elections if the FSM failed to do so.  

3.  The FSM died on 26 November 2011.  His death certificate shows he was divorced at the time of his death.  

4.  On 2 May 2012, officials at DFAS notified the applicant that there was no record of the FSM requesting to change his election to former spouse or that a copy of his divorce decree had been provided to show he was divorced.

5.  Public Law 97-252, the Uniformed Services Former Spouses Protection Act (USFSPA), dated 8 September 1982, established SBP for former military spouses.  

6.  Title 10, U. S. Code, section 1448(b)(3) incorporates the provisions of the USFSPA relating to the SBP.  It permits a person to elect to provide an annuity to a former spouse.  Any such election must be written, signed by the person making the election, and received by the Secretary concerned within one year after the date of the decree of divorce.  The member must disclose whether the election is being made pursuant to the requirements of a court order or pursuant to a written agreement previously entered into voluntarily by the member as part of a proceeding of divorce.

7.  Title 10, U. S. Code, section 1450(f)(3)(A) permits a former spouse to make a written request that an SBP election of former spouse coverage be deemed to have been made when the former spouse is awarded the SBP annuity incident to a proceeding of divorce.  Section 1450(f)(3)(C) provides that an election may not be deemed to have been made unless the request from the former spouse of the person is received within one year of the date of the court order or filing involved.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that the SBP election made by the deceased FSM be changed from spouse coverage to former spouse coverage. 

2.  Although the applicant could have and should have made a written request that the FSM’s SBP be converted from spouse coverage to former spouse coverage within 1 year of their divorce when the FSM failed to do so the evidence shows that an injustice occurred in this case.  Therefore, it would now be appropriate to correct the injustice done to the applicant due to the FSM’s failure to comply with the terms contained in their 8 November 2004 divorce settlement.

3.  By law, incident to a proceeding of divorce, a member has 1 year to provide an annuity to a former spouse by making such an election.  The law also permits the former spouse concerned to request that a former spouse SBP coverage election be deemed to have been made within 1 year of the divorce.    

4.  The evidence of record confirms the FSM agreed to continue SBP protection for the applicant as part of their 2004 divorce.  It is also evident that he violated this agreement by failing to convert his SBP from spouse coverage to former spouse coverage within 1 year of the dissolution of his marriage to the applicant.  As the FSM’s death certificate shows that he was divorced and had not remarried prior to his death, there appears to be no other person other than the applicant with a valid interest in receiving SBP annuity payments due to the death of the FSM.

5.  Given the FSM’s agreement to the court-directed continued SBP protection for the applicant as a former spouse, and given that the FSM continued to make SBP payments until his death, it would be appropriate and serve the interest of justice, compassion, and equity to grant the requested relief.  

BOARD VOTE:

____x___  ____x___  ____x___  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing the applicant timely filed a request for a deemed election to change the FSM’s SBP election from spouse coverage to former spouse coverage and that the applicant be paid the SBP annuity retroactive to the day after the FSM’s death.




      _______ _   _x______   ___
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120009616



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120009616



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013924

    Original file (20080013924.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This coordination confirmed that the FSM did not apply for former spouse SBP coverage for the applicant within 1 year of their divorce, and that the applicant did not make a deemed election within 1 year of their divorce. Although the applicant could have and should have made a written request that the FSM’s SBP be converted from spouse coverage to former spouse coverage within 1 year of their divorce, the evidence shows that an injustice occurred in this case. In view of the facts of this...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | AR20140007672

    Original file (AR20140007672.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The DFAS provided multiple documents among which was: * copy of the applicant's deemed election request for former spouse coverage, which was submitted within 1 year after the divorce * counsel's reinforcement of the applicant's deemed election request * applicant's and FSM's divorce decree * FSM's Death Certificate showing he died on 9 February 2014 * applicant's Death Certificate showing she died on 1 June 2014 * DFAS' denial of benefits letter to the FSM's widow * widow's Marriage...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022434

    Original file (20120022434.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provided a Certificate of Death showing the FSM died on 20 December 2009 and was married to her at the time. A DFAS, Retired and Annuity Pay, letter dated 31 January 2013 addressed to the FSM's former spouse, stated that with regard to her recent correspondence to DFAS regarding the retired pay account of the FSM and SBP coverage, the following was provided: (1) Former spouse SBP coverage is not automatically granted based on being awarded in a divorce decree; a formal request...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008265

    Original file (20090008265.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence of record or independent evidence provided by the applicant that shows the FSM ever made the Former Spouse SBP election directed in the divorce decree, or that the applicant requested a deemed election be made within one year of their divorce. Title 10, U.S. Code, Chapter 73, provides that a spouse loses status as an SBP beneficiary upon divorce; however, the means by which the divorced (former) spouse may receive a survivorship annuity are: (1) if the service member...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074969C070403

    Original file (2002074969C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, through counsel, that the settlement agreement, which was incorporated into the 29 July 1999 divorce decree, required the FSM to elect former spouse SBP coverage. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the member was participating in the SBP or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. That all of the Department of the Army records related to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017562

    Original file (20110017562.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * she and the FSM gave the best years of their lives to the Army * the only reason she divorced the FSM is because of what Operation Desert Storm did to him; he came back a different man * their divorce decree clearly stipulated that she was to be the beneficiary under the SBP at the FSM's expense * the FSM paid SBP premiums from his retired pay each and every month * in spite of their divorce, she and the FSM spoke at least once a week * when the FSM knew he was dying...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001548

    Original file (20090001548.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant, the former spouse of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests that she be provided an annuity under the FSM’s Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1450(f)(3)(A), permits a former spouse to make a written request that an SBP election of former spouse coverage be deemed to have been made when the former spouse is awarded the SBP annuity incident to a proceeding of divorce. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100001066

    Original file (20100001066.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her deceased former spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show that he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage from "spouse" to "former spouse" coverage at the time of their divorce and payment of the SBP annuity based on his death. The applicant contends the records of her deceased former spouse should be corrected to show that he changed his SBP coverage from "spouse" to "former spouse" coverage pursuant to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013140

    Original file (20090013140.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows that prior to his retirement in 1996, the FSM elected full SBP spouse coverage. There is no indication that the FSM submitted the necessary forms to change his SBP election from "spouse" to "former spouse" within 1 year of the divorce. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing he changed his SBP coverage from "spouse" to "former spouse" coverage within 1 year of their divorce in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023708

    Original file (20100023708.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The record is void of any indication the FSM complied with the divorce decree to maintain SBP coverage for the applicant as "former spouse" and there is no indication the applicant requested a deemed election for SBP coverage within 1 year of the divorce. DFAS records show the FSM's SBP coverage designation at the time of his death was still "spouse only" and the FSM's widow is now the legal beneficiary of the SBP annuity. Title 10, U.S. Code, chapter 73, provides that a spouse loses...