Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008424
Original file (20120008424.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  15 November 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120008424 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his military records to show he enrolled in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) within one year of marriage and elected spouse coverage.

2.  The applicant states he was single at the time of his retirement; but now he is married and he would like to enroll his wife in the SBP.  He contends that they presently have enough to get by but his death would be devastating to his wife's welfare.  The SBP could be the difference in whether or not his wife can remain in the house.  He also states that he was single at the time and he did not pay attention to the paragraph at the bottom of the retirement letter.  He is asking that the Board not penalize his wife due to his neglect.  

3.  The applicant provides the first page of an SBP Election Change Certificate, DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 29 March 1962, Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) Summary of Retired Pay Account, Certificate of Marriage, and a DFAS Designation of Beneficiary Information form.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's Summary of Retired Pay Account, dated 20 January 2000, indicates that he retired on 15 January 2000 in the rank and grade of master sergeant/E-8.  His Summary of Retired Pay Account contains the following statement "Because you indicated that you currently have no eligible beneficiaries, no specific SBP coverage has been established.  Should you acquire beneficiaries (spouse/children) in the future, advise this center immediately so that appropriate SBP coverage can be established in your retired pay account."

3.  The applicant married on 14 July 2003.  There is no evidence in the available record that shows he ever attempted to add his spouse to the SBP.

4.  He provides the first page of an SBP Election Change Certificate in which he is requesting a change in coverage based on marriage and a DFAS Designation of Beneficiary Information form, dated 12 April 2012, that indicates he designated his spouse as his beneficiary.  

5.  Public Law 92-425, the SBP, enacted 21 September 1972, provided that military members could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving family members.

6.  In addition to enrollment opportunities at retirement, and upon newly acquiring family members, Congress periodically authorizes open season enrollment periods.  These open seasons allow retirees not participating or not fully participating to enroll in SBP.

7.  The National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year 2005 established an Open Season to be conducted from 1 October 2005 through
30 September 2006.  Extensive publicity was given through Army Echoes, the Army bulletin published and mailed to retirees to keep them abreast of their rights and privileges and to inform them of developments in the Army.


8.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1448(a)(5) provides that a person who is not married upon becoming eligible to participate in SBP but who later marries may elect to participate in the SBP.  Such an election must be written, signed by the person making the election, and received by the Secretary concerned within one year after the date in which that person marries.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's request for correction of his military records to show he enrolled in the SBP within one year of his marriage has been carefully considered.  

2.  By law, a member who is not married, upon obtaining eligibility to participate in the SBP, may elect to participate in the SBP to cover a newly acquired spouse. Such an election must be in writing, signed by the person making the election, and received by the Secretary concerned within one year after the date on which that person marries.

3.  The applicant had up to one year after he married to add his spouse to the SBP and a second opportunity to add his spouse to his SBP during the 2005-2006 open season and there is no evidence in the available records that shows he attempted to do so.  

4.  The applicant has shown no evidence of error or injustice in his case.  The fact that he now desires to add his spouse to his SBP is insufficient to warrant granting the requested relief.

5.  The applicant is advised that if Congress authorizes another open season, it will be publicized in the Army Echoes.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x___  ____x___  ____x___  DENY APPLICATION
 
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   _x______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120008424



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120008424



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018531

    Original file (20130018531.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He was single at the time and he made an SBP election for children only coverage. Therefore, as a matter of equity, the applicant's records should be corrected to show he enrolled his spouse in the SBP within 1 year of his marriage. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing the applicant made a voluntary change in his SBP election from child only to spouse and child on 10 July 2008 and that the request...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011191

    Original file (20110011191.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his records be corrected to show he requested spouse Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) coverage in a timely manner. He provided a DD Form 1883, dated 1 May 1994, which shows on that date he was not married and he elected to participate in the RCSBP for children only coverage, full base amount, option C (Immediate Annuity). Evidence indicates he first attempted to request a change to his SBP election in conjunction with his application...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003898

    Original file (20090003898.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provided a copy of a DD Form 2656-3, dated 23 November 1999, which shows an election of spouse and child beneficiary category based on the full amount of retired pay with immediate coverage. Each statement showed the current SBP coverage elected by the retiree or the fact that no SBP election is reflected. As such, the election for spouse and child only made at the time of his retired pay application would not have been valid.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019127

    Original file (20080019127.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that he has tried unsuccessfully to correct his record to show enrollment in the SBP, with spouse coverage, since the date of his marriage, on 9 April 2005. On 17 July 2008, by letter, DFAS notified the applicant that a review of his retired pay account indicated he had elected SBP for child(ren) coverage since he had no eligible spouse at the time of his retirement from the Regular Army. In his letter the applicant stated, in effect, that he married, on 9...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007740

    Original file (20140007740.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He provided a DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel), dated 5 January 2012, which shows he elected spouse-only coverage. He also provided a retiree account statement, effective 7 March 2012, which shows he had spouse-only SBP coverage. He provided a retiree account statement, effective 21 March 2014, which shows he had children-only SBP coverage.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001439

    Original file (20120001439.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show that he enrolled his spouse in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) in a timely manner. Records show that during the applicant's retirement processing in 1995 he completed an application for retired pay. There is no evidence the applicant submitted an application to enroll in SBP with spouse coverage within 1 year of the date of their marriage.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011300

    Original file (20080011300.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The FSM and the applicant married on 8 May 1999. The FSM married the applicant in May 1999. However, the Army Echoes issued at the time he married the applicant reminded retirees that if they remarried and needed to make an SBP election they were responsible for contacting DFAS, clearly indicating that an SBP election could be made upon remarriage and clearly implying that the new wife could be covered.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000734

    Original file (20090000734.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 6 September 1987, a Chronological Statement of Retirement Points published by U. S. Army Reserve Personnel Center (ARPERCEN) shows the applicant had attained 20 qualifying years of service for retirement at age 60 as of 30 March 1987. The applicant's Retiree Account Statement shows that he had Child Only RCSBP coverage. The applicant’s election to participate in the RCSBP Child Only Coverage was an irrevocable decision which rolled over into the SBP upon his reaching age 60.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016016

    Original file (20130016016.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This letter further informed him that by law, he had only 90 calendar days from the date he received this letter to submit his DD Form 1883 (SBP Election Certificate). The applicant's records do not indicate he elected to participate in the RCSBP within 90 days of receiving his 20-year letter, and it appears he...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009007

    Original file (20140009007.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was serving in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) in the pay grade of E-5 when he was issued his 20-Year letter on 25 September 2002. However, the applicant has not provided and his records do not contain any evidence to show that the applicant notified the DFAS within 1 year of his marriage, that he had married, which would have made him eligible to elect the change of his SBP beneficiary to add his spouse. While the applicant contends that he was never informed that he had to...