IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 18 October 2012
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120008264
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests to change the character of service of his discharge from uncharacterized to honorable.
2. The applicant states he cannot find a job despite performing 6 months and 19 days of service. He claims he slipped on a curb and later completed an Army Physical Fitness Test. This resulted in him receiving a stress fracture to his foot which contributed to everything changing for him. He further states, in effect, he needs an upgrade of his character of service in order to obtain medical benefits.
3. The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) and a self-authored statement.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant's record shows he enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve on 31 October 2003, and entered initial active duty training (IADT) on 21 November 2003, within career management field 31 (Signal Operations).
2. The applicant received developmental counseling on:
* 24 February, 2 March, 16 March, and 12 April 2004, for trouble adapting to military service
* 6 March 2004, for violating Policy Memorandum 17 (Smoking)
3. The applicant received nonjudicial punishment (NJP) under the provisions of Article 15 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) on 17 March 2004, for violating Policy Memorandum 17 (Smoking).
4. On 7 April 2004, the applicant was examined by the Chief, Child and Family Psychology Services, Dwight D. Eisenhower Army Medical Center. He was subsequently diagnosed with an adjustment disorder with mixed disturbance of emotions and conduct as well as a personality disorder not otherwise specified with paranoid and narcissistic traits. Based on the examination, it was determined the applicant had no mental disease, defect, or derangement sufficient to warrant medical disposition under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation) as outlined in Army Regulation 40-501 (Standards of Medical Fitness). However, his condition was deemed appropriate for an administrative separation under paragraph 5-13, Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Administrative Separations).
5. On 23 April 2004, the applicant underwent a separation physical. It was noted his left ankle was tender; however, he was found to be qualified for separation with a recommendation for him to follow up with his primary care provider upon discharge.
6. The applicant's commander informed him he was initiating action to separate him for a personality disorder and that he was recommending an uncharacterized discharge. On 6 May 2004, the applicant acknowledged notification of the proposed separation action.
7. On 20 May 2004, the applicant consulted with legal counsel and was advised of the basis for the contemplated action to separate him for a personality disorder and its effects, the rights available to him, and the effect of any action taken by him in waiving his rights. He requested to consult with military counsel but did not submit statements in his behalf.
8. On 3 June 2004, the separation authority approved the applicant's discharge and directed he receive an entry level separation (uncharacterized). On 9 June 2004, the applicant was discharged accordingly after completing 6 months and 19 days of active military service.
9. The applicant's DD Form 214 shows:
* in item 24 (Character of Service) "Uncharacterized"
* in item 25 (Separation Authority) "AR 635-200, PARA 5-13"
* in item 26 (Separation Code) "JFX"
* in item 27 (Reentry Code) "3"
* in item 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation) "PERSONALITY DISORDER"
10. On 28 January 2011, the applicant was informed his application to the Army Discharge Review Board for a change in the character and/or reason of his discharge was denied.
11. Army Regulation 635-200 provides the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Paragraph 5-13 at the time provided that a Soldier could be separated for personality disorder, not amounting to disability under Army Regulation 635-40, which interfered with assignment to or performance of duty. The regulation required that the condition be a deeply-ingrained maladaptive pattern of behavior of long duration that interfered with the Soldier's ability to perform duty. The regulation also directed that commanders would not take action prescribed in this chapter in lieu of disciplinary action, required that the diagnosis concluded the disorder was so severe that the Soldiers ability to function in the military environment was significantly impaired, and stated that separation for personality disorder was not appropriate when separation was warranted under chapter 4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, or 15; Army Regulation 604-10 (Military Personnel Security Program); or Army Regulation 635-40.
a. The service of a Soldier separated per paragraph 5-13 was to be characterized as honorable unless an entry level separation was required. A separation was described as an entry level separation with service uncharacterized if processing was initiated while a Soldier was in entry level status.
b. For Army National Guard (ARNG) and USAR Soldiers, entry level status began upon enlistment in the ARNG or USAR. It terminated 180 days after beginning training for Soldiers ordered to IADT for one continuous period.
12. Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) states item 28 of the DD Form 214 will be completed as shown in Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designators). Army Regulation 635-5-1 states the narrative reason for separation for Soldiers separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-13 is "personality disorder."
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicants request to change the character of service of his discharge from uncharacterized to honorable has been carefully examined and found to be without merit.
2. The evidence of record confirms he was diagnosed with a personality disorder by competent medical authority prior to his completion of 180 days of service. Based on this diagnosis, Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-13, was the appropriate authority for the applicant's separation. The applicant's narrative reason for separation is in accordance with the applicable regulations. The evidence of record further shows that all requirements of law and regulation were met and that the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process.
3. The ABCMR does not grant requests for discharge upgrades solely for the purpose of making an applicant eligible for veterans' or medical benefits. Every case is individually decided based upon its merits when an applicant requests a change in his or her discharge.
4. In view of the foregoing, he is not entitled to the requested relief.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
___X____ ____X __ ____X___ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
_______ _ X______ ___
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20120008264
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20120008264
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015881
The applicant requests correction of his records to show he was: * medically discharged under honorable conditions instead of discharged with an uncharacterized discharge by reason of personality disorder * discharged on 5 October 1989 instead of 26 September 1989 2. Because this mental status evaluation determined he was diagnosed with a personality disorder that affected his ability to function effectively in a military environment, his chain of command initiated separation action against...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010875
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant's commander informed him he was initiating action to separate him for a personality disorder and that he was recommending an uncharacterized discharge. Army Regulation 635-200 provides the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100027936
Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. Paragraph 5-13 provides that a Soldier may be separated for a personality disorder, not amounting to a disability under Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation), that interferes with assignment to or performance of duty. The governing regulation states a separation...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090012071
There are no service medical records in the available records. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-13, provides that a Soldier may be separated for personality disorder, not amounting to a disability under Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation), that interferes with assignment to or performance of duty. There is no evidence of record to show he was ever medically unfit to perform his duties.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005943
A separation will be described as entry-level with service uncharacterized if processing is initiated while a Soldier is in entry-level status, except when characterization under other than honorable conditions is authorized under the reason for separation and is warranted by the circumstances of the case; when Headquarters, Department of the Army, on a case-by-case basis, determines that characterization of service as honorable is clearly warranted by the presence of unusual circumstances...
ARMY | DRB | CY2004 | AR2004104473
On 25 May 2000, the applicant was discharged. Further, the appropriate authority approved the applicant’s discharge by reason of a personality disorder with service uncharacterized. Minority views: NONE PART VII - BOARD ACTION SECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified MR. RIVERA Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATION SECTION A - DIRECTIVE NONE SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority: ROBERT L. HOUSE Colonel, U.S. Army President,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110000391
The applicant requests, in effect, correction of: * items 12a (Date Entered AD [Active Duty] This Period) and 12c (Net Active Service This Period) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) * item 24 (Character of Service) of his DD Form 214 to show honorable 2. Discharge proceedings under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), paragraph 5-13, for personality disorder were initiated...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020045
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. c. Paragraph 5-17 provides that Soldiers may be separated for mental conditions not amounting to disability under Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation) that potentially interfere with assignment to or performance of duty. A VA service-connected disability rating does not establish entitlement to discharge from the Army for medical reasons.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019268
The applicant requests, in effect, a medical discharge and/or an honorable discharge. Commanders may approve separation under this paragraph on the basis of other physical or mental conditions not amounting to disability under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation) and excluding conditions appropriate for separation processing under paragraph 5-11 (separation of personnel who did not meet procurement medical fitness standards)...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040010662C070208
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 27 SEPTEMBER 2005 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20040010662 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. In a previous application to this Board dated 5 December 2003, the applicant requested that his records be corrected to show physical disability retirement or separation. Medical proceedings, regardless of the date...