Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007953
Original file (20120007953.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:  6 November 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120007953 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests an adjustment of his retired pay to reflect active service of 2 years, 10 months, and 4 days.

2.  He states his retired pay is based on 1 year, 10 months, and 4 days of active service.  It should be adjusted to reflect active service of 2 years, 10 months, and 4 days as shown on his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge).  

3.  He provides copies of:

* DD Form 214
* U.S. Army Military Personnel Center Letter Orders Number D 10-97, dated 10 October 1973
* Letter, Retired Pay Division, subject:  Retired Pay, dated 11 April 1972
* a check stub

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  His military records show he enlisted in the Regular Army on 7 November 1969.  He was awarded the military occupational specialty of 11C (Infantry Indirect Fire Crewman).  The highest rank/grade he held was sergeant/E-5.

3.  He was retired from active duty on 10 September 1971 due to physical disability.  His DD Form 214 shows he completed 2 years, 10 months, and 4 days of creditable active service.

4.  A letter from the Chief, Retired Pay Division addressed to the applicant; subject:  Retired Pay, dated 11 April 1972, stated the applicant was retired 11 September 1971 in the grade of sergeant/E-5 with a 100 percent temporary disability rating.

5.  U.S. Army Military Personnel Center Letter Orders Number D 10-97, dated 10 October 1973, subject:  Removal from Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) stated the applicant was placed on the TDRL on 11 September 1971.

6.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Personnel Separations – Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army.  It establishes standardized policy for the preparation of the DD Form 214.  It states that the DD Form 214 is a synopsis of the Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty.  It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's DD Form 214 shows he served on active duty during the period 7 November 1969 through 10 September 1971 and that this service equals 2 years, 10 months, and 4 days.  However, his DD Form 214 contains a mathematical error in that this service equals 1 year, 10 months, and 4 days.  However, it has long been the policy of this Board not to make an applicant worse off than when the applicant applied to the Board.  As such, the error on the applicant's DD Form 214 will not be corrected.

2.  The applicant states his retired pay is based on 1 year, 10 months, and 
4 days; it appears there is no error or injustice.  Therefore, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ____X __  ____X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120007953



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120007953



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012645

    Original file (20140012645.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PEB recommended a combined physical disability rating of 80 percent and permanent disability retirement. There is no evidence in the FSM’s pay records at DFAS that show he participated in the SBP and/or contributed any premiums toward the SBP. With respect to his permanent retirement, on 15 February 1972 a TDRL PEB convened and recommended a combined physical disability rating of 80 percent and placement permanent retirement.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018215

    Original file (20140018215.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's request for reconsideration of his previous case, in which he contends the Board incorrectly stated his medical conditions and the reason for his discharge, was carefully considered. On 10 January 1972, he was determined to be permanently unfit for duty by reason of physical disability, removed from the TDRL, and discharged from the service with entitlement to severance pay. Since there is no historical evidence of his VA compensation awards and effective dates, there is no...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0000747

    Original file (0000747.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-00747 INDEX CODE: 108.05 COUNSEL: DAV HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She receive pay for the 6 years she spent on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) from 6 Jun 91 through 4 Jun 97; that her TDRL pay be non-taxable; she receive continued disability (incapacitation) pay; and, her records be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020725

    Original file (20130020725.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 2 September 2014 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20130020725 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. Army Regulation 135-180 (Army National Guard and Army Reserve – Qualifying Service for Retired Pay Nonregular Service), paragraph 2-3 (Notification of Retired Pay Eligibility), states that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012711

    Original file (20130012711.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his record to show he completed 13 years, 2 months, and 20 days of creditable military service for retired pay. His DD Form 214 for the period ending 19 April 1985 shows he was ordered to active duty during the period 21 September 1981 through 19 April 1985. The applicant was further advised that DFAS did not calculate his retired pay based on his retirement DD Form 214 but rather on his retirement order.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060001463C070205

    Original file (20060001463C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his records be corrected to show all of his active duty service. The DD Form 214 only reflects active duty service; Soldiers placed on the TDRL are not performing active military service. Since the applicant did not perform active duty after 31 July 1990 and was placed on the TDRL on 1 August 1990, his DD Form 214 correctly shows his separation date as 31 July 1990.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005999

    Original file (20130005999.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The FSM's records show he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 28 November 1952. His service record does not show that he made an SBP election. The FSM served in the Regular Army from 28 November 1952 to 31 January 1955.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050000694C070206

    Original file (20050000694C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    As a result of that examination, a PEB on 6 November 1978 determined that the applicant was physically unfit for military service and recommended that he be permanently retired with a 60 percent disability rating. A Soldier on the TDRL must undergo a periodic medical examination and PEB evaluation at least once every 18 months to decide whether a change has occurred in the disability for which the Soldier was temporarily retired. Nevertheless, the applicant was discharged from the Army on...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018706

    Original file (20130018706.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). His DD Form 214 shows he retired by reason of disability. Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show his rank and grade and date of rank as PFC, E-3, and 7 December 1971 respectively.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018951

    Original file (20100018951.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Separation or Discharge) to show the Combat Infantryman Badge and the Air Medal. Records show the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from item 24 of his DD Form 214 the Vietnam Service Medal; b. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st award) for...