Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007899
Original file (20120007899.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	   

		BOARD DATE:	  25 October 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120007899 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM).

2.  The applicant states he was discharged from service on 29 January 1968, awarded the ARCOM on 15 April 1968, and received the medal on 2 December 1968.

3.  The applicant provides:

* DD Form 214
* a letter from Headquarters, U.S. Army Armor Center, Fort Knox, KY, dated 2 December 1968
* ARCOM Certificate, dated 15 April 1968
* ARCOM Citation
* Page 2 of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record)

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 


3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 9 February 1966.  He completed training and he was awarded military occupational specialty 76W (Petroleum Storage Specialist).  The highest rank/grade he attained during this period of service was sergeant (SGT)/E-5.  He served in Vietnam from
1 March 1967 to 28 January 1968 while assigned to the 196th Aviation Company.

3.  General Orders Number 2211, issued by Headquarters, 1st Aviation Brigade, dated 1968, as amended by General Orders Number 4633, issued by the same headquarters, dated 15 July 1968, awarded him the ARCOM for meritorious service in Vietnam for the period July “1966” to January 1968.

4.  Item 38 (Record of Assignments) of his DA Form 20 shows he received all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his service.  His record does not contain any derogatory information or a commander's disqualification that would have precluded him from being recommended for or awarded the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal.

5.  On 29 January 1968, the applicant was honorably released from active duty on 29 January 1968 and he was transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Annual Training) to complete his remaining service obligation.  The DD Form 214 he was issued at the time shows the:

* National Defense Service Medal
* Vietnam Service Medal
* Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960)
* Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-14)
* Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-16)
* 1 Overseas Service Bar

6.  Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, provides that the Army Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who have completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service.  This period is 3 years except in 


those cases when the period for the first award ends with the termination of a period of Federal military service.  The enlisted person must have had all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings and no convictions by a court-martial.

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards), paragraph 2-13, contains the regulatory guidance on the Vietnam Service Medal.  It states that a bronze service star is authorized with this award for each Republic of Vietnam campaign a member is credited with participating in.  Appendix B shows that during his service in the Republic of Vietnam, the applicant participated in the following two campaigns:

* Vietnam Counteroffensive Phase II (1 July 1966 - 31 May 1967)
* Vietnam Counteroffensive Phase III (1 June 1967 - 29 January 1968)

8.  Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) lists the awards received by units serving in Vietnam.  This pamphlet shows the 196th Aviation Company, the unit to which the applicant was assigned, was cited for award of the:

* Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation for the period 1 March 1966 through 26 March 1967 by Department of the Army General Orders (DAGO) Number 22, dated 1968
* Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation for the period 27 March 1967 through 17 May 1968 DAGO Number 46, dated 1968

9.  Paragraph 6 (Miscellaneous Information) of this pamphlet states that not more than one award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross Unit Citation may be worn by any individual.  Although wear of multiple awards of this unit citation badge is not authorized, official military personnel and historical records will indicate all awards received.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  General orders awarded him the ARCOM.  Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this award.

2.  The evidence of record confirms he served honorably during the period 9 February 1966 through 29 January 1968.  He completed his tour of duty in Vietnam, he received all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his service, and he attained the rank/grade of SGT/E-5.  His record does not contain any derogatory information or a commander's disqualification that would have 


precluded him from being awarded the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal.  Therefore, it would be appropriate at this time to award him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 9 February 1966 through
29 January 1968 and to correct his DD Form 214 to show this award.

3.  Records show the applicant participated in two campaigns during his service in Vietnam.  Therefore, he is entitled to two bronze service stars for wear on his already-awarded Vietnam Service Medal and correction of his DD Form 214 to show these bronze service stars.

4.  The applicant's unit in the Vietnam was cited for two awards of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation during his period of assignment.  Although he is only authorized to wear one of these awards, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show both of these unit awards.

BOARD VOTE:

____x___  ____x___  ____x___  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

	a.  deleting from his DD Form 214 the Vietnam Service Medal;

	b.  awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period
9 February 1966 through 29 January 1968; and

	c.  adding to his DD Form 214 the:

* Army Commendation Medal
* Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award)
* Vietnam Service Medal with 2 bronze service stars


* Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation
(2nd Award)



      ___________x____________
               CHAIRPERSON

I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120007899



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120007899



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070008074

    Original file (20070008074.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests award of the Bronze Star Medal (BSM), the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) for Heroism (or ARCOM with "V" Device) and the Combat Action Ribbon. d. General Orders Number 00305, dated 31 December 1971, published by Headquarters, 196th Infantry Brigade awarding the BSM to the applicant for meritorious service in connection with military operations against a hostile force for the period 20 January 1971 through 1 January 1972. e. The BSM citation, which supports and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090012668

    Original file (20090012668.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show his last duty assignment was the 196th Aviation Company and to document both his tours in the Republic of Vietnam. Therefore, it would be appropriate to award him the 1st award of the AGCM for his qualifying period of honorable active duty service from 2 October 1967 through 25 September 1970. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011817

    Original file (20140011817.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for the first award only, 1 year served entirely during the period 7 December 1941 to 2 March 1946; and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year. Therefore, it would be appropriate to award him the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024244

    Original file (20100024244.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His record shows he served in the Republic of Vietnam from 15 July 1966 to 14 July 1967. The applicant's request for correction of his DD Form 214 to show the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm unit citation, bronze service stars on his Vietnam Service Medal, and any other awards, citations, or medals he may be entitled to was carefully considered and was determined to have merit. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028239

    Original file (20100028239.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 9 June 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100028239 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. 4th Battalion (Mechanized), 23d Infantry was awarded the Valorous Unit Award for the periods 26–28 May 1968 and 27 August–31 October 1968; the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation for the period April 1966–August 1968; and the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation for the period 30 April 1966-21 January 1970. b. As a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002530

    Original file (20140002530.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A review of the applicant's military personnel records failed to reveal any orders or other evidence that shows he was recommended for or awarded a second award of the SS. The available evidence does not show the applicant was recommended for or awarded a second award of the SS for actions in the RVN. Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant's DD Form 214 to show his awards and decorations, as recommended below.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017094

    Original file (20080017094.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s records also show he served in the Republic of Vietnam from 3 November 1967 to 2 November 1968. This document shows that during the applicant's tenure of assignment: a. the 23rd Supply and Transport Battalion was awarded the Meritorious Unit Commendation, from 1 January 1968 to 31 August 1969, based on Department of the Army General Orders Number 53, dated 1970; b. the 4th Battalion, 31st Infantry, was awarded the Valorous Unit Award from 15 November 1967 to 3 February 1968,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002888

    Original file (20130002888.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requested award of the Silver Star and correction of his record to show this award. Therefore, it would be appropriate at this time to award him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 3 May 1966 through 2 May 1968 and to correct his DD Form 214 to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from his DD Form 214 the Army Commendation Medal with "V" Device and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022090

    Original file (20120022090.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show the award of the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM). He provided and his record contains general orders which show he was awarded the ARCOM during his period of service in Vietnam. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding to his DD Form 214 the: * Army Commendation Medal * Aviation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001056271C070420

    Original file (2001056271C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. In addition, the PUC awarded to Company B, 1 st Platoon, 9 th Infantry Division was awarded after (5 January 1968) the provided evidence shows he departed Vietnam. Recommend the applicant attempt to obtain his 201 file from the VA and provide the original records to the Board.