| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mrs. Nancy Amos | Analyst |
| Mr. Raymond V. O’Connor, Jr. | Chairperson | |
| Mr. John P. Infante | Member | |
| Mr. William D. Powers | Member |
2. The applicant requests that his records be corrected to reflect award of the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM), the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, the Navy Unit Commendation Medal, the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal, and the Presidential Unit Citation (PUC).
3. The applicant makes no additional statement. He provides his Report of Transfer or Discharge, DD Form 214, an unsigned copy of an ARCOM citation, and a copy of his unit’s history from the Internet as supporting evidence.
4. The applicant’s military records are not available. The information contained herein was obtained from alternate sources.
5. The applicant was inducted into the Army on 12 May 1966. He completed basic combat training and advanced individual training and was awarded military occupational specialty 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman).
6. The provided ARCOM citation shows the applicant was assigned to Company C, 4th Battalion, 47th Infantry, 9th Infantry Division from 10 January 1967 to 31 December 1967. His DD Form 214 shows he served 11 months and 26 days in Vietnam. While in Vietnam he earned the Purple Heart and the Bronze Star Medal with V device. He was assigned to Fort Hood, TX when he separated on 10 May 1968.
7. A search of records at the National Archives and at the U. S. Total Army Personnel Command could not locate a copy of the General Orders awarding the applicant the ARCOM. It was noted that numerous General Orders are listed as missing from the historical files at these two locations.
8. The Internet extract provided by the applicant shows that Company B, 1st Platoon of the 9th Infantry Division was awarded the Presidential Unit Citation for action on 5 January 1968.
9. Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides that the Army Commendation Medal may be awarded to any member of the Armed Forces of the United States who, while serving in any capacity with the Army after 6 December 1941, distinguished himself or herself by heroism, meritorious achievement or meritorious service. As with all personal decorations, formal recommendations, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders are required.
10. Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 shows that the 4th Battalion, 47th Infantry was awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation for the period 1 December 1966 – 30 June 1968 and the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal, First class for the period 19 December 1966 – 28 June 1969. (It also shows Company C was awarded the PUC for the period 29 January – 4 March 1968.) There is no record of either the 47th Infantry or the 9th Infantry Division or any subordinate unit of these organizations being awarded the Navy Unit Commendation.
11. There is evidence to show that the applicant’s military personnel records jacket, DA Form 201, was provided to the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). The Board analyst confirmed with the Waco, TX, VA Regional Office that their computer system shows they should have his 201 file; however, it is annotated as “incoming.” That indicated to Waco that his 201 file might be at the Houston, TX VA Regional Office. However, numerous attempts by the Board analyst to contact the Houston Regional Office failed to elicit a return response.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant provides an ARCOM citation that shows he was assigned to Company C, 4th Battalion, 47th Infantry yet he requests award of the PUC that was awarded to Company B, 1st Platoon, 9th Infantry Division. In the absence of other verifying records such as the applicant’s military personnel records jacket or general orders, the Board finds that the provided unsigned ARCOM citation is insufficient to show he was awarded the ARCOM. Since there is no other verifying records, the Board also cannot determine if the applicant was assigned to the 4th Battalion, 47th Infantry, 9th Infantry Division.
2. If it could be verified that the applicant was assigned to the 4th Battalion, 47th Infantry, 9th Infantry Division, the applicant would be eligible for award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation and the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal, First Class. From the provided evidence, he would not have been assigned to the battalion during the period it was awarded the PUC (29 January – 4 March 1968). In addition, the PUC awarded to Company B, 1st Platoon, 9th Infantry Division was awarded after (5 January 1968) the provided evidence shows he departed Vietnam.
3. The applicant is eligible for award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation in any instance since all units assigned to Vietnam are eligible for that award.
4. Recommend the applicant attempt to obtain his 201 file from the VA and provide the original records to the Board. His 201 file may contain information that could substantiate the applicant’s assignment history, enabling the Board to reconsider his request for the additional awards.
5. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. That the applicant’s DD Form 214 be amended to add the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation.
2. That so much of the application as is in excess of the foregoing be denied.
BOARD VOTE:
__rvo___ __jpi___ __wdp___ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
Raymond V. O’Connor, Jr.
______________________
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2001056271 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20011129 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | (GRANT) |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 107.0031 |
| 2. | 107.0020 |
| 3. | 107.0094 |
| 4. | 107.0095 |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010395
x The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant served a period of qualifying service for award of the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal. Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or injustice now under consideration on 17 October 1969; therefore, the time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on 16 October 1972.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050006739C070206
The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Good Conduct Medal, the Combat Infantryman Badge, three bronze service stars to be affixed to the Vietnam Service Medal, the 1960 Device to be affixed to the Vietnam Campaign Medal, the Meritorious Unit Commendation, a second award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, one individual award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028966
Records show the applicant participated in one campaign during his assignment in Vietnam. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting the entry "Vietnam Campaign Medal" from item 24 of his DD Form 214; and b. adding the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960), Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003086668C070212
This medal was awarded by the Government of Vietnam to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam during the period 1 March 1961 through 28 March 1973. The applicant’s DD Form 214 shows the Vietnam Service Medal as an authorized award. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart with First Oak Leaf Cluster, the Army Commendation Medal, the Good Conduct...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060017430
Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the applicant's DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) does not show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge. The applicant's records show that he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. However, there is no evidence that the applicant served in an infantry duty position in active ground combat while assigned or attached to an infantry unit of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005024
During the time of the applicants assignment to the 4th Battalion, 47th Infantry the unit was awarded the: * Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation for the periods 1 December 1966 - 30 June 1968 and January - June 1969 by Department of the Army General Orders (DAGO) Numbers 31 dated 1969 and 59 dated 1969, respectively * Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation for the period 19 December 1966 28 June 1969 by DAGO Number 59 dated 1969 b. ...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018367
This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. 3rd Squadron, 5th Cavalry, was cited for award of the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation for the period 19 December 1966 to 15 February 1968 by Department of the Army General Orders (DAGO) Number 43,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013157
The Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940 and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year. Therefore, it would be appropriate to award him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) at this time and correct his DD Form 214 to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002530
A review of the applicant's military personnel records failed to reveal any orders or other evidence that shows he was recommended for or awarded a second award of the SS. The available evidence does not show the applicant was recommended for or awarded a second award of the SS for actions in the RVN. Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant's DD Form 214 to show his awards and decorations, as recommended below.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060341C070421
The applicant has presented a copy of a certificate signed by the 9th Infantry Division Commanding General showing that he was awarded the ARCOM for meritorious service from July 1967 through May 1968, a period corresponding to his period of assignment to the 9th Infantry Division. The applicant is also entitled to have his DD Form 214 corrected to show that he was awarded the Valorous Unit Award, RVN Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, the RVN Civil Actions Medal, First Class Unit...