Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007414
Original file (20120007414.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:  

		BOARD DATE:  13 November 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120007414


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the Unites States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his pay grade as E-4.

2.  He states a clear and unmistakable error was made upon his discharge.  He was offered an "early out" and received extra back pay upon discharge because it was discovered he was an E-4, not an E-3.

3.  The applicant submits his DD Form 214 and release from active duty (REFRAD) orders. 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted on 3 May 1965.  He completed training and was awarded MOS 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman.
 
3.  His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in item 
33 (Appointments and Reductions) his grade was private first class/E-3 with
date of rank 22 January 1966.

4.  His DD Form 214 shows he was honorably released from active duty in the pay grade of E-3 effective 20 February 1967.  He completed 1 year, 9 months, and 5 days of total active service.  

5.  In support of his request he provided Special Orders Number 39, Walter Reed Medical Center, dated 16 February 1967.  These orders show in the standard name line that his pay grade was E-3 and contain the remark "No years pay gr E4:  NA."  There is no indication in these orders that he had been promoted to 
E-4.

6.  His finance records are no available for review.

7.  There is no available evidence to show he was promoted to E-4 prior to his release from active duty.

8.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army.  It establishes standardized policy for the preparation of the DD Form 214.  For item 5b (Pay Grade), enter the pay grade in which serving at the time of separation.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends his pay grade on his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show E-4.

2.  There is no available evidence he was promoted to E-4 prior to his REFRAD or that he received back-pay at the E-4 rate.

3.  Therefore, there is no basis for correction of the applicant's DD Form 214.



BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__ _X_____  ___X____  _____X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ______________X___________
                 CHAIRPERSON

I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120007414



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010945C071029

    Original file (20060010945C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 22 March 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060010945 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests that his Report of Transfer or Discharge (DD Form 214) be corrected to show that he was released from active duty in the rank and pay grade of sergeant (E-5). The Board determined that the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002222

    Original file (20140002222.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). A DD Form 1351-2, dated 9 January 1968, that shows his grade/rank as SP5/E-5. The available evidence is sufficient to correct the applicant's DD Form 214 to show he was promoted to and released from active duty in the rank of SP5/E-5.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013031

    Original file (20110013031.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) by amending the following items to show: * Item 5a (Grade, Rate or Rank) - “specialist six (SP6)” * Item 5b (Pay Grade) - “E-6” * Item 6 (Date of Rank (DOR)) - “30 April 1969” * Item 25 (Education and Training Completed) - “Military Occupational Specialty (MOS) 94B (Cook), 8 Weeks, 1967" 2. It also provided for the temporary promotion of enlisted personnel of the Active...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012591

    Original file (20110012591.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s military record shows he was inducted into the Army of the United States (AUS), in pay grade E-1, on 28 October 1965. There is no evidence in his records to show he was again promoted to CPL, pay grade E-4, prior to his REFRAD. He was discharged from the USAR, in the rank of PFC, pay grade E-3, on 27 October 1971.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070010213

    Original file (20070010213.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his Report of Transfer or Discharge (DD Form 214) to show that he was released from active duty (REFRAD) in the rank and pay grade of staff sergeant (E-6). The applicant was promoted to the pay grade of E-2 on 6 September 1966 and he was promoted to the pay grade of E-3 on 25 January 1967. The available evidence indicates that a request for orders was submitted to the Commanding General, 1st Armored Division requesting that the applicant be promoted to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | AR20070017928

    Original file (AR20070017928.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his Report of Transfer or Discharge (DD Form 214) be corrected to show that he was awarded the Purple Heart and that he was promoted to the rank of sergeant (E-5). His DD Form 214 also shows that he was REFRAD in the pay grade of E-4. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending his DD Form 214 to show that he as awarded the Purple Heart and awarding him two Bronze Service Stars...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017569

    Original file (20130017569.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he was promoted from pay grade E-4 to pay grade E-5. A review of the available records fails to show that orders were ever published promoting the applicant to pay grade E-5 while he was in the Army. _______ _ x_______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004100832C070208

    Original file (2004100832C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Linda D. Simmons | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant states, in effect, that he satisfactorily served as a SFC/E-7 on active duty and he requests that his rank and pay grade on the Retired List be corrected to reflect the highest grade he held and in which he served on active duty, which was SFC/E-7. In view of the facts of this case, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant’s record to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100025023

    Original file (20100025023.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show he was promoted to the pay grade of E-5. The applicant states, in effect, that approximately 2 days before departing Vietnam he appeared before a promotion board in Qui Nhon and he was promoted to the pay grade of E-5 the next day. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | AR20060011942C071029

    Original file (AR20060011942C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his Report of Transfer or Discharge (DD Form 214) be corrected to show that he was discharged in the rank and pay grade of sergeant (E-5). There is no evidence in the available records that supports his contention that he was ever promoted to the pay grade of E-5. The Board determined that the evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.