Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100008605
Original file (20100008605.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		
		BOARD DATE:	  28 October 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100008605 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests reconsideration of his earlier request for award of the Purple Heart due to a combat-related wound and injury.  

2.  The applicant states that somehow his wound was not reported as required.  

3.  The applicant provides a self-authored statement, dated 29 January 2010; a letter addressed to former fellow Soldiers, dated 3 January 2010; and seven eyewitness statements.  

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20080019598 on 7 May 2009.  

2.  The applicant’s self-authored statement and eyewitness statements are new evidence that warrant consideration by the Board.  

3.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 25 June 1963.  He served in Vietnam from 20 August 1965 to 9 June 1966.

4.  Item 40 (Wounds) of the applicant’s DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not show he sustained any wounds as a result of hostile action.  His name is not listed on the Vietnam Casualty Roster.  
5.  His service personnel record does not contain orders for award of the Purple Heart or medical documents which show he was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam.   

6.  The applicant was honorably released from active duty on 9 June 1966 by reason of overseas returnee.  His DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) does not show the Purple Heart as an authorized award.

7.  The applicant provided a self-authored statement in support of his claim.  He gives a brief history of the events involving his injury as follows:

* On 18 December 1965, he sustained a shrapnel wound on the right side where his leg connects to his body
* The medic put a bandage on the wound and said he would tend to the wound later
* The medic was later injured and was evacuated with other injured
* He continued to man his machine gun (M-60) for the remainder of the operation
* He had a hernia operation, sometime in early 1970's, in the location where the shrapnel was located
* The surgeon removed the shrapnel and gave it to him
* He also had a foot injury that occurred while on operations and kept him on profile for several weeks

8.  The applicant wrote a letter, dated 3 January 2010, addressed to several former Soldiers who served with him in Vietnam.  He requested each individual to provide missing information regarding his shrapnel wound.  He provided a prepared typed statement and requested each of them to provide comments and return it to him.  

9.  The applicant provided the following prepared statement to his former fellow Soldiers:

In mid-December of 1965, our unit was involved in combat operations in Vietnam.  In the course of those activities I personally witnessed a wound suffered by H----- L---- on December 18, 1965.  Specifically, a piece of shrapnel, between 1/4 - 1/2" imbedded in his right upper thigh.  He was attended to by our platoon medic who covered it with a small bandage intending to address it later as it was not life threatening and because there were others who needed immediate and urgent attention.  The medic was later wounded and evacuated.
Seven of his former comrades responded by returning the above statement with their own comments and signatures.

10.  Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have been treated by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official records.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s service record does not contain any evidence or medical documents which verify he was injured as a result of hostile action in Vietnam.

2.  His record is also void of any evidence and he has not provided any evidence showing he sustained a foot injury while participating in combat operations.  Additionally, he has not provided any evidence in support of his claim that following his period of active duty service, he underwent a hernia operation during which "the surgeon removed the shrapnel and gave it to him."

3.  His service record does not contain orders which authorized him the award of the Purple Heart and his name is not listed on the Vietnam casualty roster.  By regulation, in order to award the Purple Heart it is necessary to establish that a Soldier was wounded in action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the treatment must have been made a matter of official record.  

4.  In the absence of any corroborating evidence which shows the applicant was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action, there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award of the Purple Heart in this case.

5.  The eyewitness statements attesting to the fact that the applicant sustained a wound on 18 December 1965 in his right upper thigh were noted.  However, these statements alone are not sufficient to meet the regulatory burden of proof necessary to support award of the Purple Heart in this case.







BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__x____  ___x_____  ____x____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis to amend the decision of the ABCMR set forth in Docket Number AR20080019598, dated 7 May 2009.



      __________x_____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100008605



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                              

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007166

    Original file (20120007166.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence in the available records which shows the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart or was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. There is no evidence in the available record that shows he was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. In the absence of corroborating evidence showing he was injured and treated for wounds as a result of hostile action in Vietnam, the eyewitness statement and military photograph provided by the applicant are not sufficient...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012703

    Original file (20140012703.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). He received first aid from another Soldier and later the medic bandaged his injury. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021081

    Original file (20090021081.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence of record which shows the applicant was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. In the absence of orders or other evidence of record showing that the applicant was injured or treated for wounds as a result of hostile action in Vietnam, the eyewitness statements provided by the applicant, which give conflicting descriptions of the alleged wounding, are not sufficient as a basis for award of the Purple Heart. _______ _ X_____ ___ CHAIRPERSON I...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023026

    Original file (20110023026.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    c. A statement from a former unit member who states the company was ambushed on 17 July 1967 by small arms fire and mortar rounds and that they took some casualties at the time. d. A statement from a friend who served in Vietnam at the time and who also supports awarding the applicant the Purple Heart. Notwithstanding the applicant's contention and his sincerity and/or those of the authors, in the absence of additional documentation that conclusively shows he was wounded or injured as a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014565

    Original file (20080014565.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that he was wounded in his right thigh by shrapnel during a rocket attack on 27 February 1969 in the Republic of Vietnam; however, his injury was not entered into his medical records. In his statement, dated 17 January 2008, a retired Lieutenant General (LTG) states that he served at Da Nang during the same time frame and that he learned that the applicant was wounded during a rocket attack but was not awarded the Purple Heart. There are no general orders that show he...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140006567

    Original file (20140006567.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Purple Heart (2nd Award) and the Bronze Star Medal. Headquarters, 4th Infantry Division, General Orders Number 2275, dated 30 May 1968, awarded him the Purple Heart for wounds sustained in action on 30 March 1968.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004104598C070208

    Original file (2004104598C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The medical reports that the applicant submits with his request show that he was being treated for problems with his left knee. On one report, his physician indicated that the applicant had stated that he had a history of shrapnel wounds in the left hand, and had previous shrapnel wounds to his tibia. The applicant's statement that he was immediately evacuated to Japan, thus orders were never issued for award of the Purple Heart, is not consistent with the evidence of record.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011760

    Original file (20060011760.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, reconsideration of his earlier request to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) that he be awarded the Purple Heart. The applicant's new argument, as stated in his request, is that he should be awarded the Purple Heart for a wound sustained in 1967, in Phu Bai, Vietnam, during a mortar attack. However, there is no evidence, and the applicant has provided none, to show that he sustained a wound in 1967, in Vietnam, during a mortar...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020841

    Original file (20140020841.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states he is enclosing a page of his medical records which shows he received shrapnel wounds while in Vietnam. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action. In the absence of documentation that conclusively shows he was wounded or injured as a result of enemy action and treated for those wounds, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis for awarding...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007228

    Original file (20100007228.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There are no orders for the Purple Heart in the applicant's service personnel records. In the absence of orders or other evidence of record showing that the applicant was injured or treated for wounds as a result of hostile action in Vietnam, the eyewitness statements provided by the applicant are not sufficient as a basis for award of the Purple Heart. ____________x_____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board...