Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006652
Original file (20120006652.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  19 July 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120006652 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart (PH) for an injury received while on active duty.  

2.  The applicant states he has shrapnel in his left arm from a firefight.

3.  The applicant provides:

* A letter to a staff member of Senator Wellstone’s office
* A letter from Senator Wellstone’s office
* A copy of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge)
* A copy of his U.S. Government Motor Vehicle Operator’s Identification Card

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 2 January 1968 and was trained in and awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman).  He was discharged on 24 January 1969.

3.  The DD Form 214 shows he earned the following awards during this period of active duty service:

* National Defense Service Medal (NDSM)
* Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) 
* Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB)
* Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-14)

4.  The applicant’s Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) is void of orders or documents indicating he was wounded in action in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN).  It is also void of medical treatment records indicating he was ever treated for a combat-related wound.  Item 40 (Wounds) of the applicant’s DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) is blank, and the PH is not included in the list of earned awards in item 41 (Awards and Decorations).

5.  During the processing of this case, a staff member of the Board reviewed the
Department of the Army (DA) Vietnam Casualty Roster.  The applicant's name was not included on the roster.  

6.  Review of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System (ADCARS), an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the U.S. Army Human Resources Command, failed to reveal any orders for the PH pertaining to the applicant.

7.  The applicant provides a letter to his Senator’s staff member explaining his rationale for award of the PH and that the Senator’s letter advised him to direct his questions to a member of his staff.

8.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides the Army's awards policy.  Paragraph 2-8 contains guidance on the PH.  It states the PH is awarded to members wounded in action.  It also states in order to award the PH there must be evidence of the wound for which the award is being made was received as a result of enemy action, the wound required treatment by medical personnel, and a record of the medical treatment was made a matter of official record.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's request to be awarded the PH based on wounds received while on active duty has been carefully considered.  However, there is insufficient evidence to support this claim.  

2.  By regulation, in order to support award of the PH the member must have been wounded in action and there must be evidence the wound for which the award is being made was received as a result of enemy action, the wound must have required medical treatment by medical personnel, and this medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.

3.  Item 40 of the applicant’s DA Form 20 is blank.  Further, there are no documents in the applicant's MPRJ that indicate he was treated for a combat-related wound by medical personnel during his tour in the RVN.

4.  Absent any evidence confirming the applicant was wounded in action while serving in the RVN, it would not be appropriate to award the applicant the PH.

5.  The applicant and all others concerned should know this action related to award of the PH in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by him in service to our Nation.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ___X_____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION










BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   __X_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120006652





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120006652



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022015

    Original file (20110022015.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant provides a statement indicating: * He was a member of the 101st Airborne * He was deployed to the RVN and served one year * He was wounded by shrapnel in the right hand * He later reinjured his hand and it became infected * He was medical evacuated to the rear for treatment * He was once again offered a PH which he declined 8. It states the PH is awarded to members wounded in action.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018037

    Original file (20110018037.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 40 (Wounds) of the applicant's DA Form 20 is blank and the PH is not included in the list of awards contained in item 41 (Awards and Decorations). The applicant provides a PH certificate, dated 5 May 1969, which shows the applicant was awarded the PH for being wounded in action in the RVN on 4 May 1969. It states the PH is awarded to members wounded in action.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100027566

    Original file (20100027566.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states he was wounded in action and awarded the PH in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN); however, it was not included on his DD Form 214. The applicant’s DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he served in the RVN from 18 September 1967 to 16 September 1968. It states the PH is awarded to members wounded in action.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002488

    Original file (20090002488.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. During its original review of the applicant's case, the Board found no evidence of record that showed the applicant was wounded or injured as a result of enemy action, or that he was ever recommended for or awarded the PH by proper authority while serving on active duty. Absent any evidence of record to corroborate the information contained in the third-party statements provided by the applicant, or medical treatment records that confirm...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080000607

    Original file (20080000607.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    x The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. However, by regulation, in order to support award of the PH there must be evidence that the wound for which the award is being made was received as a result of enemy action; that the wound required treatment by military medical personnel; and a record of this medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record. In order to justify correction of a military record the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070017149C080407

    Original file (20070017149C080407.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his reconsideration request, the applicant provides a self-authored letter in which he indicates, in effect, that he received a wound to his hand while engaged in combat with enemy forces in the RVN, and that he was treated for this wound by military medical personnel. The applicant's Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) is void of any orders or other documents that indicate the applicant was ever recommended for or awarded the PH by proper authority while serving on...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004106596C070208

    Original file (2004106596C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 40 (Wounds) is blank and the PH is not included in the list of awards contained in Item 41 (Awards and Decorations). However, to support award of the PH, there must be evidence confirming the wound or injury for which the award is being made was the direct result of or caused by enemy action. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the individual concerned to show that based on his service and campaign participation in the RVN, he...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100025036

    Original file (20100025036.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's military personnel records jacket (MPRJ) is void of any orders or other documents that show the applicant was recommended for or awarded the PH and/or ARCOM during his active duty tenure. By regulation, in order to support award of the PH there must be evidence the wound for which the award is being made was received as a result of enemy action, the wound required treatment by military medical personnel, and a record of the medical treatment must have been made a matter of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050004553C070206

    Original file (20050004553C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 19 October 2005 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20050004553 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant also states, in effect that during another attack on his camp he was hit on the top of his head with a small piece of shrapnel, but did not report this injury because it seemed to be minor. Therefore,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060002646C070205

    Original file (20060002646C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    However, by regulation, in order to support award of the PH, there must be evidence that the wound for which the award is being made was received as a direct result of, or was caused by enemy action, that the wound was treated by military medical personnel, and a record of this medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record. Therefore, his records should be corrected to show these awards. Notwithstanding the staff DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS above, the Board determined...