Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018037
Original file (20110018037.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  1 March 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110018037 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests the Purple Heart (PH) be added to his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge).  

2.  The applicant states he was awarded the PH for wounds received in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) and it is not listed on his DD Form 214.  

3.  The applicant provides a PH certificate in support of his application.  

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 9 October 1968, and was trained in and awarded military occupational specialty 76S (Auto Repair Parts Specialist).  
3.  His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he arrived in the RVN on 20 March 1969.  Item 38 (Record of Assignments) shows the applicant entered a patient status in the RVN on 12 May 1969 and he was medically evacuated to Fort Carson, Colorado on 21 May 1969. 

4.  Item 40 (Wounds) of the applicant's DA Form 20 is blank and the PH is not included in the list of awards contained in item 41 (Awards and Decorations).  Item 48 (Date of Audit) shows the applicant last audited the DA Form 20 on 
4 June 1970.  

5.  The applicant’s Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) is void of orders or documents indicating he was wounded in action in the RVN.  It is also void of medical treatment records indicating he was ever treated for a combat-related wound.  

6.  On 8 October 1970, the applicant was honorably released from active duty, in the rank of private first class, after completing 2 years of active military service.  The PH is not included in the list of earned awards on the DD Form 214 issued to him at the time. 

7.  The applicant provides a PH certificate, dated 5 May 1969, which shows the applicant was awarded the PH for being wounded in action in the RVN on 4 May 1969.  

8.  During the processing of this case, a staff member of the Board reviewed the DA Vietnam Casualty Roster.  The applicant's name was not included on the roster. 

9.  Review of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System, an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the U.S. Army Human Resources Command, failed to reveal orders for the PH.  

10.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides the Army's awards policy.  Paragraph 2-8 contains guidance on the PH.  It states the PH is awarded to members wounded in action.  It also states in order to award the PH there must be evidence of the wound for which the award is being made was received as a result of enemy action, the wound required treatment by medical personnel, and a record of the medical treatment was made a matter of official record.




DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's request to add the PH to his DD Form 214 has been carefully considered.  However, there is insufficient evidence to support this request.  

2.  By regulation, in order to support award of the PH the member must have been wounded in action and there must be evidence the wound for which the award is being made was received as a result of enemy action, the wound must have required medical treatment by medical personnel, and this medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.

3.  Although the applicant provides a PH certificate and his record shows he entered a patient status, on 12 May 1969, and he was ultimately medically evacuated from the RVN, there are no medical treatment records confirming treatment for a combat related wound, or orders authorizing and announcing award of the PH in the MPRJ.  Further, item 40 of the applicant’s DA Form 20 is blank, which indicates he was never wounded in action, and the PH is not included in the list of earned awards in item 41.  

4.  Absent evidence of record corroborating the information contained in the PH certificate provided by the applicant or information that confirms he was wounded as a result of enemy action while serving in the RVN there is an insufficient evidentiary basis to support granting the requested relief.  

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X___  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case 




are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   X_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110017852



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110018037



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080000607

    Original file (20080000607.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    x The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. However, by regulation, in order to support award of the PH there must be evidence that the wound for which the award is being made was received as a result of enemy action; that the wound required treatment by military medical personnel; and a record of this medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record. In order to justify correction of a military record the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100027566

    Original file (20100027566.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states he was wounded in action and awarded the PH in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN); however, it was not included on his DD Form 214. The applicant’s DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he served in the RVN from 18 September 1967 to 16 September 1968. It states the PH is awarded to members wounded in action.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070017149C080407

    Original file (20070017149C080407.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his reconsideration request, the applicant provides a self-authored letter in which he indicates, in effect, that he received a wound to his hand while engaged in combat with enemy forces in the RVN, and that he was treated for this wound by military medical personnel. The applicant's Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) is void of any orders or other documents that indicate the applicant was ever recommended for or awarded the PH by proper authority while serving on...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070012229C080407

    Original file (20070012229C080407.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Ronald D. Gant | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant's MPRJ is void of any orders or other documents that indicate he was ever recommended for or awarded the PH by proper authority while serving on active duty, or that show he was treated for a combat related wound or injury by military medical personnel while serving in the RVN. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070006000C071029

    Original file (20070006000C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Qawiy A. Sabree | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. Item 40 (Wounds) is blank, and the PH is not included in the list of awards contained in Item 41 (Awards and Decorations). Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the individual concerned to show his entitlement to the Valorous Unit Award, Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation and 4...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017985

    Original file (20110017985.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he served in the RVN from 13 August 1970 to 9 August 1971. It states the PH is awarded to members wounded in action. It also states in order to award the PH there must be evidence of the wound for which the award is being made was received as a result of enemy action, the wound required treatment by medical personnel, and a record of the medical treatment was made a matter of official record.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040006890C070208

    Original file (20040006890C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 9 June 2005 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20040006890 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. However, by regulation, in order to award the PH it is necessary to establish that a Soldier was wounded as a result of enemy action, that he was treated by military medical personnel for the wound for which the award is...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060002646C070205

    Original file (20060002646C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    However, by regulation, in order to support award of the PH, there must be evidence that the wound for which the award is being made was received as a direct result of, or was caused by enemy action, that the wound was treated by military medical personnel, and a record of this medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record. Therefore, his records should be corrected to show these awards. Notwithstanding the staff DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS above, the Board determined...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060000155C070205

    Original file (20060000155C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) is void of any orders, or other documents indicating that he was ever wounded in action, or that he was recommended for or awarded the PH by proper authority while he was serving on active duty. The applicant's MPRJ is void of any orders, or other documents showing that he was ever recommended for, or awarded the PH by proper authority during his tenure on active duty, and it contains no medical treatments records that indicate he was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070010000C080407

    Original file (20070010000C080407.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    It states, in pertinent part, that in order to award a PH there must be evidence that the wound for which the award is being made was received as a result of enemy action, that the wound required treatment by military medical personnel, and a record of this treatment must have been made a matter of official record. By regulation, in order to support award of the PH there must be evidence confirming that the wound for which the award is being made was received as a result of enemy action;...