Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006162
Original file (20120006162.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF: 

		BOARD DATE:	    10 January 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120006162 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show her rank and pay grade as specialist four (SP4)/E-4 and a different mailing address after separation.

2.  The applicant states her unit did not keep very good records.  She was a SP4 when her obligation ended and she never lived at the address shown on her DD Form 214.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of orders, dated 2 November 1992, reassigning her from a U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) unit assignment and transferring her to the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  On 5 January 1984, the applicant enlisted in the USAR for 6 years.  She entered Reserve service in pay grade E-3 based upon her civilian education and her agreement to participate in an USAR unit that was authorized to accept such advanced pay grade recruits.

3.  The address shown on her enlistment contract is also shown on her DD Form 1966 (Application for Enlistment) and as her address on the accompanying college transcript.  It is also listed as her mother's address on the DD Form 1966.

4.  Her DD Form 214 was issued on 30 August 1985 upon her completion of 2 months and 6 days of initial active duty for training (IADT).  Her rank and pay grade are shown as private first class (PFC)/E-3.  Item 19 (Mailing Address After Separation) shows the identical address described above.  She signed the DD Form 214 as the person being separated.

5.  The applicant's DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record – Part II) shows she was advanced to SP4/E-4 effective 8 March 1986.

6.  The USAR reassignment orders she submitted with her application show she was serving as a specialist when she was transferred to the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement).

7.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), paragraph 2-1, states, "the DD Form 214 is a summary of a Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty.  It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active duty service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge.  The DD Form 214 is not intended to have any legal effect on termination of a Soldier's service."

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant provided no pertinent evidence to support her application.

2.  The DD Form 214 issued upon the applicant's release from IADT reflects information that matches that provided by other documents at that point in time.

3.  The DD Form 214 is intended to reflect only her period of active duty, not her entire military career.

4.  She was not advanced to SP4/E-4 until almost a year after she was released from IADT.

5.  Whether or not the applicant actually lived at the address shown on her DD Form 214, it is the address she provided on her application for enlistment and her enlistment contract.  

6.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X____  __X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _ X_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120005920



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120006162



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007968

    Original file (20120007968.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests update of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 24 August 1982 to reflect her correct rank, military occupational specialty, years of service, decorations, military education and foreign service. The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 * National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000072

    Original file (20100000072.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    BOARD DATE: 13 July 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100000072 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests removal of the P code (U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Standby Reserve Inactive Status) from her records so that 2008 is a creditable year towards retirement and promotion. Evidence shows that the applicant returned the MSO election to remain in the IRR and on 15 April 2009, she was released from the Standby Reserve and reassigned to the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement);...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018123

    Original file (20100018123.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's record shows: a. on 2 March 1982 she enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) and she was ordered to active duty for split option training; b. from 24 May 1982 to 17 July 1982 she attended basic training at Fort Jackson, SC; c. in Orders Number 40-7, issued by the Military Entrance Processing Station, Nashville, TN, dated 25 February 1983, she was ordered to active duty to attend advanced individual training in MOS 72E; d. in Orders Number 106-143, issued by Headquarters,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100029431

    Original file (20100029431.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    She states she served 11 months and 8 days of active duty and then reenlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) on 19 December 1985 for six years. Her separation packet is not available for the Board’s review; however, her DD Form 214 shows she was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) on 12 December 1979, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Enlisted Personnel), chapter 8, for pregnancy. Orders D-12-135821, dated 18 December 1991, which are contained in her military...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019480

    Original file (20110019480.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of item 19a (Mailing Address After Separation) of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show her mailing address after separation as "13xxx Parkxx, Poplar Grove, IL 61065" instead of "90xx Mixxx Cxxxxx, Riverside, CA 92509." The purpose of the separation document is to provide the individual with documentary evidence of his or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070001595C071029

    Original file (20070001595C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Further, the applicant's record shows that during her military service she was recognized with an AAM for her meritorious service between 2 June 1979 and 3 August 1981. Based on the original recommendation of the applicant's unit commander, and on her overall record of service, it would be appropriate to correct her record to show her 13 July 1982 transfer to the USAR Control Group was accomplished Under Honorable Conditions, and to show she was discharged on 30 August 1984, in the rank of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021403

    Original file (20110021403.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of her discharge documents from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) to show her rank as specialist four (SP4). Her Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) contains Orders 1-1, dated 1 February 1986, that promoted her to SP4 effective and with a date of rank of 1 February 1986.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001730

    Original file (20120001730.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A DD Form 214 shows the applicant entered active duty on 7 January 2005, she was honorably REFRAD on 6 February 2006 based on completion of required active service. The evidence of record also shows the applicant had continuous service as a member of the USAR from 31 January 2000 through the date she was REFRAD on 6 February 2006. b. Thus, records show the applicant's HOR was incorrectly recorded on her orders when she was ordered to active duty in support of OEF on 7 January 2005.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016814

    Original file (20110016814.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests reinstatement to the rank/grade of sergeant (SGT)/E-5 and correction of her records to show she was promoted to SGT/E-5 with a date of rank (DOR) of September 2004. The DD Form 214 she was issued for this period of service shows her rank as SGT and DOR as 1 February 2002. d. Based on the above, recommend that: * All documents in the applicant's file from 1 February 2002 to 23 November 2004 reflecting the rank of SGT be amended to reflect the rank of PFC * The Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150009021

    Original file (20150009021.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her records to show her home of record (HOR) as Miami, FL instead of Dumfries, VA. 2. The evidence of record shows upon her initial enlistment in the USAR in August 2008, she listed her HOR as Miami, FL. Her records correctly reflect her HOR as Dumfries, VA because that is the place recorded as her home when ordered into the relevant tour of active duty.