Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005932
Original file (20120005932.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:  16 October 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120005932 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart.

2.  He states:

* he was wounded in action in or about November 1969
* he declined award of the Purple Heart at the time because he did not wish to worry his mother, who was alone

3.  He submitted his Veterans Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Information Attachment or worksheet.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's DD Form 214 shows he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 13 May 1968.

3.  His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he served in Vietnam from 22 April 1969 through 4 April 1970 and he was assigned to the 608th Transportation Company and the 604th Transportation Company.  His DA Form 20 also shows in:

	a.  item 40 (Wounds) no entries; and

	b.  item 41 (Awards and Decorations) no entry for the Purple Heart.

4.  On 5 April 1970, he was honorably released from active duty at the expiration of his term of service.  He was transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Annual Training) to complete his remaining service obligation.  His 
DD Form 214 indicates he completed 1 year, 10 months, and 23 days of total active service.  His DD Form 214 also shows he served in Vietnam from 22 April 1969 through 5 April 1970; however, it does not show award of the Purple Heart.

5.  A review of the Awards and Decorations Computer Assisted Retrieval System maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the U.S. Army Human Resources Command, which is an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973, failed to reveal any orders for the Purple Heart pertaining to the applicant.

6.  The Adjutant General's Office, Casualty Division's Vietnam casualty listing does not list the applicant's name as a casualty.

7.  There are no medical records in his official military personnel file that show he was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam.

8.  He submitted his Veterans PTSD worksheet wherein he indicates he was wounded in November 1969, in Pleiku, Vietnam, while assigned to the 608th Transportation Company. 

9.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.


DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The regulation governing award of the Purple Heart indicates the wound for which the award is being made must have been a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required medical treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.

2.  Regrettably, there is no corroborating evidence in the applicant's record and he provided insufficient evidence to show he was wounded as a result of hostile action.

3.  In view of the foregoing, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

4.  The applicant and all others concerned should know that this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by the applicant in service to our Nation.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ____X __  ____X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      													_________X___________
      														CHAIRPERSON

I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120005932



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120005932



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021400

    Original file (20100021400.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action. _____________X______________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009122

    Original file (20080009122.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) contains no orders, or other documents that indicate he was recommended for, or awarded the Purple Heart. The journal also shows that the applicant was the Soldier for whom the "Dust Off" was requested and mentions "frag[mentation] wounds.” Therefore, there is sufficient evidence available to award the applicant the Purple Heart and correct his records to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009878

    Original file (20140009878.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his record to show award of the Purple Heart for injuries he received in Vietnam. His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in: a. item 38 (Record of Assignments) he was assigned to the 515th Transportation Company from 1 October 1969 to 22 September 1970; b. item 40 (Wounds) is blank; and c. item 41 (Awards and Decorations) does not show award of the Purple Heart. It states the Purple Heart is awarded to members wounded in action and states...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130014834

    Original file (20130014834.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His military records also do not contain orders awarding him the Purple Heart. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, provides that the Army Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who have completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 3 April 1967 through 5...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019442

    Original file (20080019442.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, it appears the applicant requests, in effect, correction of his separation document to show he was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman) and that he was wounded in action and awarded the Purple Heart. A thorough review of the applicant’s military personnel records revealed that there are no orders or other evidence in his records that show he was awarded MOS 11B. While the evidence of record shows that the applicant served in Duty MOS 11B1O...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018343

    Original file (20100018343.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. Therefore, it would be appropriate to award him the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal based on completion of a qualifying period of Federal military service and correct his DD Form 214 to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015507

    Original file (20080015507.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, that his records be corrected to show the award of the Purple Heart. _________X_____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130014273

    Original file (20130014273.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests two awards of the Purple Heart and correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Separation or Discharge) to show the two awards and the Bronze Star Medal. c. As for the June 1970 injury, again there is no evidence of an injury or that such injury occurred as a result of hostile action, and there is also no evidence he was treated or that his treatment was made a matter of official record. There is no evidence in the available records...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130014042

    Original file (20130014042.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of the Purple Heart. A review of the applicant's military personnel records failed to reveal any orders or other evidence that shows he was awarded the Purple Heart. The applicant contends his records should be corrected to show award of the Purple Heart because he was injured while serving in the Republic of Vietnam in 1969 and the VA granted him disability for the service-connected injury.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017793

    Original file (20130017793.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He served in Vietnam from 8 June 1969 to 11 January 1970. There is no evidence of record that shows he was injured or wounded as a result of hostile action or that he was awarded the Purple Heart. Notwithstanding his sincerity, in the absence of documentation that conclusively shows he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action, treated for those wounds/injuries, and his treatment was made a matter of record, there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award of the Purple Heart.