Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005603
Original file (20120005603.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		
		BOARD DATE:	  2 October 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120005603 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his records to show he elected not to participate in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP).

2.  The applicant states he signed his SBP election form without fully understanding the document.  Neither he nor his spouse wishes to participate in the SBP program and it is not something they can financially maintain.

3.  The applicant provides his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), a concurrence statement signed by his spouse, an SBP premium bill, and a letter.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant's records show he enlisted in the Regular Army on 27 May 1999 and he held military occupational specialty 11B (Infantryman).  He was promoted to the rank of staff sergeant (SSG) on 1 August 2008.

2.  He served in a designated imminent danger pay area with his assigned unit as follows:

* Afghanistan, 7 August 2003 - 1 May 2004
* Iraq, 5 December 2005 - 1 November 2006
* Afghanistan, 27 August - 7 December 2009

3.  On an unknown date, a medical evaluation board (MEB) convened and diagnosed him with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).  

4.  On 22 August 2011, an informal found the applicant's condition prevented him from performing the duties required of his grade and specialty and determined that he was physically unfit due to PTSD with elements of anxiety disorder.  His condition was determined to be a battle injury, did occur in a combat theater, and was unfitting as continued exposure to combat elements risked further mental health deterioration.  The PEB recommended he be placed on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) with a 50 percent disability rating.  

5.  On 22 December 2011, he was honorably retired in the rank of SSG, by reason of temporary disability and transferred to the TDRL.  He completed 12 years, 6 months, and 26 days of creditable active service.

6.  His records contain a DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel), dated 10 November 2011, wherein he indicated he was married at the time and had four dependent children.  This form shows he elected SBP "spouse only" full coverage.  He signed this form on 11 November 2011 and his signature was witnessed by an SBP counselor from the Installation Management Agency, Fort Carson, CO.

7.  The applicant provides an SBP concurrence statement, dated 3 April 2012, wherein his spouse stated she concurred with the SBP election change requested by her spouse to terminate SBP coverage and understood that her decision was irreversible.  She further stated she understood that by signing the concurrence statement she was waving her rights to any post-death SBP benefits and that she was signing the statement of her own free will.  She signed the form on 3 April 2012 and her signature was notarized by a notary public.

8.  Public Law 92-425, enacted 21 September 1972, established the SBP.  The SBP provided that military members on active duty could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents.  An election, once made, was irrevocable except in certain circumstances.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record shows that in conjunction with his retirement processing, the applicant executed a DD Form 2656 on 10 November 2011, electing SBP "spouse only" full coverage.  At the time, he was married and had four dependent children.  

2.  The evidence of record also confirms the applicant was being retired and placed on the TDRL due to PTSD with elements of anxiety disorder incurred in a combat zone.  It is reasonable to presume that based on his PTSD resulting in the termination of his Army career, he did not fully understand the ramifications and costs of selecting SBP spouse only full coverage.

3.  Therefore, as a matter of equity, it would be appropriate to correct his records to show he elected not to participate in the SBP on 10 November 2011 and that his spouse concurred with his election.

BOARD VOTE:

___x____  ___x_____  ___x__  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

* showing he elected not to participate in SBP when he completed his DD Form 2656 on 10 November 2011 and that his spouse concurred with his election and that all required signatures were properly notarized
* paying him any monies already deducted from his retired pay for SBP coverage



      _______ _   _x______   ___
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120005603





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120005603



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014707

    Original file (20090014707.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This letter notified the applicant that she had completed the required years of service and would be eligible for retired pay upon application at age 60. The evidence of record also shows she submitted a DD Form 2656 on 25 February 2009 wherein she elected, in the presence of an RSO counselor, not to participate in the SBP. However, by law, her spouse was required to authenticate this form on or after the date she made this election but prior to the date of retirement.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100029388

    Original file (20100029388.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The spouse's signature MUST be notarized] of the DD Form 2656 is neither signed by his spouse to indicate her concurrence or non-concurrence with his election nor by a witness and/or retirement services officer. The evidence of record shows he retired on 13 July 2009 by reason of temporary disability. By law, his spouse was required to authenticate this form on or after the date he made this election but prior to the date of retirement.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016266

    Original file (20110016266.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    An SBP election must be made prior to the effective date of retirement or the SBP will, by law, default to automatic SBP spouse coverage (if married). However, the evidence also shows that both the applicant and her spouse signed a subsequent form declining coverage prior to the effective date of her retirement and the form was duly notarized. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing her duly-notarized...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003410

    Original file (20130003410.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The available evidence shows that, approximately 4 months after the effective date of his placement on the TDRL, the applicant attempted to elect not to participate in the SBP. In light of the available evidence, it would be appropriate to correct his record to show he made a timely election not to participate in the SBP prior to his retirement.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004344

    Original file (20130004344.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant, the spouse of a retired service member (SM), requests correction of the SM's DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel) to show he elected Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage for children only instead of coverage for spouse and children. The applicant provides a DA Form 7652, dated 21 October 2010, in which the SM's commander recommended the SM not be retained in the military. The available evidence does not support the applicant's request for correction of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021185

    Original file (20110021185.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel), dated 2 March 2011 * SBP Spouse Election Concurrence Statement, dated 8 March 2011 * Retiree Account Statement, dated 29 September 2011 * letter of explanation/correction request, dated 14 October 2011 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. By law, his spouse was required to authenticate this form on or after the date he made this election but prior to the date of retirement. As a result, the Board recommends that all...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006674

    Original file (20120006674.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Her retiree account statement is not available for review; however, without her spouse's signature in item 32a of her DD Form 2656, indicating his concurrence with her decision to decline participation in the SBP, her SBP election would automatically default to spouse-only coverage by law. By law, since her spouse did not acknowledge his concurrence of her election not to participate in the SBP prior to her effective date of retirement, it is proper that her SBP election defaulted to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007119

    Original file (20090007119.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 8 September 2009, the applicant submitted a copy of a notarized statement, dated 1 September 2009, indicating that his spouse concurs with his decision not to participate in the SBP. On 8 September 2009, the applicant submitted a notarized statement signed by his spouse on 1 September 2009 that shows she mistakenly checked the non-concur block on the spouse concurrence/non-concurrence statement and that she concurs with her husband’s (the applicant’s) election not to participate in the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120000267

    Original file (20120000267.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    State of Delaware, Marriage License and Certificate of Marriage, that shows the applicant and Dannette Michelle B---- were married on 20 October 2001; b. DD Form 2656-2 (SBP Termination Request) that shows: * the applicant requested to discontinue participation in the SBP * his spouse acknowledged her understanding of the disadvantages of the decision and provided her concurrence * the applicant, his spouse, and a witness signed the form on 29 December 2011 c. notarized statement by Dannette...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070011600

    Original file (20070011600.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides the following additional documentary evidence in support of his application: a. DD Form 2656, dated 15 December 2005. b. DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), dated 29 December 2005. c. Self-authored letter, dated 18 June 2007. d. Notarized spouse’s statement, dated 20 June 2007, concurring with the applicant’s election not to participate in the SBP. Evidence of record shows that the applicant, in good faith and in the presence of his...