BOARD DATE: 15 January 2013
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120012536
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart (PH) to his deceased father, a former service member (FSM).
2. The applicant states his father was discharged under honorable conditions. His father became 100-percent disabled due to post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and received service connection for scars. He states his father never received the PH for scars he incurred during the Vietnam War. He claims his father was never able to function in civilian life after the war.
3. The applicant provides a 1992 news article in support of his request.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. On 1 August 1968, the FSM enlisted in the Regular Army and he was trained in and awarded military occupational specialty 54A (Chemical Operations).
3. The FSM's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he served in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) from 18 January 1969 to 21 January 1971. Item 40 (Wounds) is blank and the PH is not included in the list of awards entered in item 41 (Awards and Decorations). His record is void of orders or other documents indicating he was awarded the PH by proper authority while serving on active duty. It is also void of any documents and/or medical treatment records showing he was wounded in action in the RVN or that he was treated for a combat-related wound by medical personnel while serving in the RVN.
4. The FSM's record shows he was awarded or authorized the following awards during his active duty tenure:
* National Defense Service Medal
* Vietnam Service Medal
* RVN Campaign Medal with Device (1960)
* two overseas service bars
* Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle (M-14) Bar
* Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle (M-16) Bar
5. On 28 April 1971, the FSM was discharged under honorable conditions in the rank/grade of private/E-1. The reason for his discharge was "unsuitability (apathy, defective attitudes, and inability to expend effort constructively)." His DD Form 214 shows he completed 2 years, 8 months, and 28 days of active military service. The FSM's DD Form 214 does not include the PH in the list of earned awards.
6. The applicant provides a 1992 news article that indicates the FSM was an Army veteran who had received shrapnel wounds to his legs in Vietnam.
7. A review of the Adjutant General's Office Casualty Division's Vietnam casualty listing does not show the FSM's name as a casualty. A review of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System, an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the U.S. Army Human Resources Command Military Awards Branch, failed to reveal an award of the PH pertaining to the FSM.
8. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) contains the Army's awards policy. Paragraph 2-8 contains guidance for the PH. It states in order to support award of the PH there must be evidence that the wound for which the award is being made was received as a result of enemy action, that it required treatment by military medical personnel, and a record of the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant's request to award the PH to the FSM has been carefully considered. However, there is insufficient evidence to support his request.
2. By regulation, in order to support award of the PH there must be evidence the wound for which the award is being made was received as a result of enemy action, the wound required treatment by medical personnel, and a record of the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.
2. The FSM's record is void of any entries or documents corroborating his son's claim that the FSM was wounded in action in the RVN. Further, there are no medical treatment records on file that indicate the FSM was ever treated for a wound received as a result of enemy action while serving in the RVN.
3. Item 40 of the FSM's DA Form 20 is blank which indicates he was not wounded in action.
4. There is no entry on the Vietnam casualty listing pertaining to the FSM, which is the official Department of the Army list of RVN casualties. Absent such evidence corroborating the applicant's claim that the FSM was wounded in action, the regulatory burden of proof necessary to support award of the PH has not been satisfied in this case.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
____X____ _____X___ ___X_____ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
__________X_______________
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20120012536
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20120012536
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006985
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Item 40 of the record copy of the FSM's DA Form 20 is blank, which indicates he was never wounded in action, and the PH is not included in the list of awards contained in Item 41. The applicant provided a copy of page 4 of the FSM's DA Form 20 showing the FSM was awarded the PH and the BSM.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020422
The evidence of record is void of any documents or orders that indicate the FSM was ever wounded in action or that he was ever awarded the PH by proper authority while serving on active duty. Absent any evidence of record to corroborate the applicant's claim that the FSM was wounded in action while serving in the RVN, the regulatory burden of proof necessary to support award of the PH has not been satisfied in this case. ____________X___________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016304
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Item 40 of the applicant's DA Form 20 is blank, which indicates he was never wounded in action, and the PH is also not included in the list of awards contained in Item 41. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011242
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Absent any evidence of record to corroborate the applicant's claim that the FSM was wounded in action while serving in the RVN, the regulatory burden of proof necessary to support award of the PH has not been satisfied in this case. ___________X_____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040007785C070208
It states, in pertinent part, that a bronze service star is authorized with this award for each campaign a member is credited with participating in while serving in the RVN. Finally, there are no orders or documents on file at the National Archives that indicate the FSM was ever wounded in action, or awarded the PH; and his name is not included on the Vietnam Casualty Roster, the official DA list of RVN battle casualties. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004528
It states the PH is awarded to members wounded in action. The applicant's record is void of any entries or documents corroborating his claim that he was wounded in action in the RVN or that show he was ever treated for a combat-related wound by medical personnel while serving in the RVN. The applicant's record is void of any documents or orders indicating he was ever recommended for or awarded the AM by proper authority during his active duty tenure and there are no AM orders for the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019618
The applicant provides the following documents in support of her application: Self-Authored Statement; Army Review Boards Agency (ARBA) Letter, dated 25 August 2008; Certificate of Death; Certificate of Marriage; United States Army Human Resources Command (HRC) Letter, dated 31 January 2008; Certificates of Release or Discharge From Active Duty (DD Forms 214); Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Rating Decisions, dated 25 May 2006 and 17 December 2007; Bronze Star Medal (BSM) Citation;...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015049C071029
The applicant states, in effect, the FSM was wounded in combat in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) and never received the PH. It states, in pertinent part, that in order to award a PH there must be evidence that the wound for which the award is being made was received as a result of enemy action, that the wound required treatment by military medical personnel, and a record of this medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record. Therefore, the Board requests that the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009377
Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) prescribes Army policy and criteria concerning individual military awards. By regulation, in order to support award of the PH there must be evidence that the wound for which the award is being made was received as a result of enemy action, that the wound required treatment by medical personnel, and a record of this medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record. Absent any evidence submitted to corroborate that he was wounded as...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080005367
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Item 40 (Wounds) of the applicant's DA Form 20 is blank, and the PH is not included in the list of awards contained in Item 41 (Awards and Decorations). In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.