Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017351
Original file (20080017351.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	        13 January 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080017351 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB).

2.  The applicant states that he served honorably with B Troop, 1st Battalion, 8th Cavalry as an infantryman in the Republic of Vietnam.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214, dated 23 April 1972, in support of his application. 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's records show he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 24 March 1971.  He completed basic combat and advanced individual training and was awarded both military occupational specialty (MOS) 11C (Indirect Fire Infantryman) and MOS 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman).  He was honorably released from active duty and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Annual Training) on 23 April 1972.  The highest rank/grade he attained during this period of military service was specialist four/E-4.

3.  The applicant's records show that he served in the Republic of Vietnam from 21 August 1971 to 21 April 1972.  Item 38 (Record of Assignments) of the applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he served with B Troop, 1st Squadron, 1st Cavalry, 196th Infantry Brigade.

4.  Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of the applicant's DA Form 20 does not show he was awarded the CIB.  

5.  There are no General Orders in the applicant's records that show he was awarded the CIB.

6.  Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the applicant’s DD Form 214, shows he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal, the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960), and the Army Commendation Medal.  Item 24 does not show award of the CIB.

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides for award of the CIB.  This regulation states that there are basically three requirements for award of the CIB.  The Soldier must be an infantryman satisfactorily performing infantry duties, he must be assigned to an infantry unit during such time as the unit is engaged in active ground combat, and he must actively participate in such ground combat.  Specific requirements state, in effect, that an Army enlisted soldier must have an infantry specialty, satisfactorily performed duty while assigned or attached as a member of an infantry unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller size during any period such unit was engaged in active ground combat.  A recipient must be personally present and under hostile fire while serving in an assigned infantry primary duty, in a unit actively engaged in ground combat with the enemy.  Commanders were not allowed to make any exceptions to this policy.  During the Vietnam era, the CIB was awarded only to enlisted individuals who held and served in MOS 11B, 11C, 11F, 11G, or 11H.  


8.  U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation Number 672-1 (Awards and Decorations) specifically governed award of the CIB to Army forces operating in South Vietnam.  This regulation specifically stated that criteria for award of the CIB identified the man who trained, lived, and fought as an infantryman and the CIB is the unique award established to recognize the infantryman and only the infantryman for his service.  Further, “the CIB is not an award for being shot at or for undergoing the hazards of day to day combat.”  This regulation also stated the CIB was authorized for award to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer persons who have an infantry MOS and required that they must have served in active ground combat while assigned or attached to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental or smaller size.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show award of the CIB.

2.  The applicant's records show he served with B Troop, 1st Squadron, 1st Cavalry, 196th Infantry Brigade in the Republic of Vietnam.

3.  Neither the applicant's infantry MOS nor his service in the Republic of Vietnam is in question.  However, there is no evidence in the available records and the applicant did not submit substantiating evidence that shows he was personally present and under hostile fire while serving in his assigned infantry MOS, performing infantry duty in an infantry unit that was actively engaged in ground combat with the enemy.  In the absence of such evidence, there is insufficient justification upon which to base award of the CIB in this case.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X____  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.


															XXX
      _______ _   _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080017351



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080017351



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100017717

    Original file (20100017717.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). His record contains and he also provided a copy of a DA Form 20 which shows in item 31 (Foreign Service) he served a tour of duty in Vietnam during the period 21 August 1971 to 26 March 1972.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019392

    Original file (20100019392.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states he was detailed to an infantry officer position where he served as an armored reconnaissance unit commander and a platoon leader for 1st Platoon, F Troop, 17th Cavalry, 196th Infantry in the Republic of Vietnam. The applicant's personnel service record does not contain orders awarding him the CIB. In its opinion, it did not concur with the applicant's request to award him the CIB stating the applicant was not branched Infantry and was not assigned to an infantry unit.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080004507

    Original file (20080004507.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides for award of the CIB. The evidence of record shows that the applicant was awarded the MOS 11B (Infantryman) and was assigned to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental or smaller size; however, the applicant has not provided sufficient evidence showing that he was directly involved in ground combat. Evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060012874

    Original file (20060012874.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Paragraph 8-6 of Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides for award of the CIB. The applicant's records show he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the CIB; b. awarding the applicant the Good Conduct Medal (First Award) for the qualifying period of 1 June 1971 through 31 May 1973; c. awarding the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082358C070215

    Original file (2002082358C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) dated 4 June 1971, to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) and award of a second Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) with “V” Device. The applicant states in effect, that he is entitled to award of the CIB, since he served in a combat unit from approximately June 1970 until January 1971. The orders for his Bronze Star Medal with “V” Device identify him as a member of D Troop, 1st Squadron, 9th...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017017

    Original file (20080017017.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    During its original review the Board determined that although the evidence of record confirmed the applicant held an infantry MOS and was assigned duties as a scout and senior scout observer with a qualifying infantry unit during his service in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN), there was no evidence of record confirming his active participation in ground combat, and that there were no orders or other documents on file that indicated he had ever been recommended for or awarded the CIB. The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003405

    Original file (20130003405.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * he recently came across several Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) decisions in which the Board awarded the CIB to Soldiers who served in military occupational specialty (MOS) 11D (Armor Reconnaissance Specialist during the Vietnam War * he served in Troop B, 1st Squadron, 9th Cavalry Regiment, 1st Cavalry Division (Airmobile), in the Republic of Vietnam, from September 1966 to September 1967 * the CIB was awarded throughout the squadron to Soldiers...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070011370C080407

    Original file (20070011370C080407.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence of record in this case, although it shows the applicant was assigned to a qualifying infantry unit, confirms he held and served in MOS 31B as a field radio mechanic while serving in the RVN. His record is void of any orders or other documents showing that he was ever recommended for, or awarded the CIB by proper authority while serving on active duty, and the CIB is not included in the list of awards contained in Item 41 of his DA Form 20. Therefore, the Board requests that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015751

    Original file (20090015751.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards and Decorations), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. The applicant's request that his DD Form 214 be corrected to show the award of the Combat Infantryman Badge is supported by the evidence. Additionally, the DD Form 214 should be amended by deleting the Vietnam Service Medal and adding the following: * Combat Infantryman Badge * Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001757

    Original file (20090001757.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states he was never credited with his CIB on his DD Form 214. The evidence of record shows the applicant completed training and was awarded MOS 11B. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the CIB; b. deleting from item 24 of his DD Form 214 the Vietnam Service Medal; and c. adding to item 24 of his DD Form 214 the CIB, the Vietnam Service Medal with four bronze service stars, the...