BOARD DATE: 2 October 2012
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120005113
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests he be paid a seasonal bonus in the amount of $20,000.00.
2. The applicant states:
a. on 12 June 2007, he signed an enlistment contract with the option of attending Ranger Indoctrination Training and he entered the Future Soldier Training Program (FSTP).
b. he entered active duty on 25 July 2007. Simultaneously, on 25 July 2007, the U.S. Army Military Personnel Command issued an electronic message (MILPER Message Number 07-188) to the U.S. Army Recruiting Command (USAREC) that outlined enlistment bonus program changes. Among these changes was the enactment of a $20,000.00 seasonal bonus to help the Army meet recruiting shortfalls that year.
c. as he was departing the recruiting station his recruiter recognized that his contract would need to be amended for payment of the seasonal bonus but the recruiter was confident the applicant's enlistment contract would be adjusted and the bonus paid later. However, upon his arrival at the military entrance processing station later that day, with the large number of new Soldiers being processed, he found little support to get his enlistment contract modified and was again promised it would be adjusted at his training station at Fort Benning, GA.
d. at Fort Benning his main duty was to successfully complete basic and advanced training followed by airborne training and Ranger assessment. He was provided too little time to coordinate problems with his enlistment contract. After his arrival at his first duty station he did attempt to talk with his supervisors over the issue but since it was an enlistment matter he was given a phone number to call at the local installation human resources office. When he called this office he was basically told if it wasn't in his contract there was nothing they could do.
e. over the next few years while serving 4 tours in the operational theater he didn't pursue the issue further. He honorably separated from the Army on
4 December 2011.
f. he pointed out MILPER Message Number 07-188 states "Soldiers currently in the FSTP are eligible for the $20K if they ship by 27 August 2007." Since he was in the FSTP as of 12 June 2007, and he shipped on 25 July 2007, he is eligible for the seasonal bonus.
3. The applicant provides:
* MILPER Message Number 07-188
* USAREC Message Number 07-168
* Enlistment contract
* Congressional correspondence
* Power of Attorney
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) on 12 June 2007 under the delayed entry program (DEP) for a period of 8 years. He was discharged from the DEP and enlisted in the Regular Army (RA) on 25 July 2007 for a period of 4 years and 19 weeks. His enlistment contract shows he enlisted for the U.S. Army Incentive Enlistment Program (cash bonus for military occupational specialty (MOS) 11X (infantry recruit) and a seasonal bonus).
2. He completed his training and was awarded MOS 11B (infantryman). He served four tours in Afghanistan. On 4 December 2011, he was released from active duty due to completion of required active service and he was transferred to the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement) to complete his remaining service obligation.
3. In the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was obtained from the Chief, Incentives and Budget Branch Enlisted Accessions Division, Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff, G-1, Washington, D.C. The advisory official points out:
a. the applicant enlisted for 4 years in MOS 11X for a $9,000.00 bonus and a $3,000.00 seasonal bonus.
b. based on MILPER Message Number 07-188, his seasonal bonus should have been adjusted to the higher amount the day he departed for active duty, although given the effective date of the message the counselor likely did not see the provision to grant the higher seasonal bonus to recruits already in the DEP.
4. The advisory official recommends the applicant be granted the higher bonus in the amount of $17,000.00 ($20,000.00 seasonal bonus minus the $3,000.00 seasonal bonus that was previously paid).
5. A copy of the advisory opinion was provided to the applicant to provide comment or rebuttal. The applicant did not respond within the given time frame.
6. MILPER Message Number 07-188, dated 25 July 2007, provides for enlistment bonus program changes. The message states effective 25 July 2007 a non-prior service seasonal bonus in the amount of $20,000.00 is available for all MOS who ship within 30 days and depart for active duty by 30 September 2007. Only Soldiers currently in the FSTP are eligible for the $20,000.00 seasonal bonus if they ship by 27 August 2007.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant's contention he should be paid a seasonal bonus in the amount of $20,000.00 was carefully considered.
2. He enlisted in the USAR on 12 June 2007 under the DEP. He enlisted in the RA on 25 July 2007 for a period of 4 years and 19 weeks and a seasonal bonus in the amount of $3,000.00.
3. MILPER Message Number 07-188 states effective 25 July 2007 a non-prior service seasonal bonus in the amount of $20,000.00 is available for all MOS who ship within 30 days and depart for active duty by 30 September 2007. Only Soldiers currently in the FSTP are eligible for the $20,000.00 seasonal bonus if they ship by 27 August 2007.
4. It appears his seasonal bonus should have been adjusted to the higher amount ($20,000.00) the day he departed for active duty (25 July 2007). Since he was already paid $3,000.00 for a seasonal bonus, it would be equitable to correct his military records and remit payment to him in the amount of $17,000.00.
BOARD VOTE:
___x___ __x______ __x_____ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:
a. amending his enlistment contract to show he enlisted for a seasonal bonus in the amount of $20,000.00; and
b. having the Defense Finance and Accounting Service pay the individual concerned $17,000.00, the remaining balance of the total amount of the seasonal bonus.
_______ _ x _______ ___
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20120005113
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20120005113
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006452
The advisory opinion also stated that the applicant contended that he is also authorized a $20,000 seasonal bonus as announced in HQDA message dated 25 July 2007. The advisory opinion stated that the cited message also permitted applicants who were in the DEP on the date of the message to receive the $20,000 bonus, but noted that the applicant was not in the DEP on the effective date of the message since he had already shipped to active duty on 9 July 2007. The advisory opinion stated...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070000168
A review of the bonus message in effect when the applicant enlisted shows the following: a $2,000.00 bonus was in effect for MOS 11X for a 3 year enlistment. AHRC recommended that the Board find in favor of the applicant's request for a total bonus payment of $6,000.00, the maximum bonus allowed for a 3 year enlistment on 12 March 2004. The evidence further shows that at the time of the applicants enlistment, there was no bonus available to the applicant under the College First Program,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070011272C071113
The applicant's record contains a Statement For Enlistment United States Army Enlistment Program DA Form 3286, dated 16 May 2006, which shows in Item (1) that, upon enlistment into the Regular Army the applicant will be enlisted under the provisions of Army Regulation 601-210, program or programs as indicated below, and contains, in pertinent part, the entry 9A – United States Army Training Enlistment Program (UNCM) and 9C - United States Army Incentive Enlistment Program (US Army Seasonal...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060003504C071029
Ronald D. Gant | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. His DA Form 3286-59 shows he was enlisting for the U. S. Army Training Enlistment Program, the U. S. Army Incentive Enlistment Program (Cash Bonus $5,000), and the ACF for $33,000. His DA Form 3286-66 (Statement of Understanding United States Army Incentive Enlistment Program) states he was enlisting for the U. S. Army Training Enlistment Program, the Seasonal...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110009475
The applicant requests to be paid the remainder of his enlistment bonus in the amount of $10,000.00. The opinion states the applicant's initial enlistment contract, dated 24 August 2007, shows he was to be paid a $20,000.00 Seasonal Enlistment Bonus which was given to all recruits who shipped for active duty between 25 July 2007 and 8 October 2007. The evidence of record confirms he enlisted for a period of 3 years on 24 August 2007 for an option that authorized him payment of a $20,000.00...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015555
The applicant requests, in effect, that his records be corrected to show he is authorized the remaining $2,000.00 of his $9,000.00 cash bonus. The applicant's record contains a DA Form 3286-66 (Statement of Understanding - U.S. Army Incentive Enlistment Program), dated 22 January 2002, which shows in pertinent part, that the applicant enlisted for 4 years and for the U.S. Army Cash Bonus. The available evidence shows the applicant enlisted for two enlistment bonuses for a total bonus...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001864C070206
The applicant provides a copy of her enlistment contract, her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), her Reservation Sheet and U.S. Army Recruiting Command (USAREC) Message 02-087 311800 May 2002. The applicant signed a USAREC Form 978-R-E (Statement of Understanding, Regular Army Enlistment Delay for Applicant with Prior Service or an Existing Military Service Obligation)) on 27 August 2002 which shows she would be enlisting for training in MOS 92G (Food...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001864C070206
The applicant states she signed her enlistment contract on 27 August 2002 and there was an enlistment bonus for her military occupational specialty (MOS). The applicant signed a USAREC Form 978-R-E (Statement of Understanding, Regular Army Enlistment Delay for Applicant with Prior Service or an Existing Military Service Obligation)) on 27 August 2002 which shows she would be enlisting for training in MOS 92G (Food Service Specialist). At the time of her enlistment, a Seasonal bonus and a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012761
Section III of this annex states he would receive the first payment of this bonus at the rate of 50 percent upon completion of initial active duty for training (IADT) and award of the MOS for which enlisted and he would receive a second and final payment of the remainder of the bonus on the 36th month of his enlistment anniversary. The evidence of record shows the applicant enlisted under the AF program while a junior in high school which he was not authorized to do under this program. As...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011263
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. His record contains a memorandum from the Deputy G1, ARNG, dated 17 December 2012, denying the applicant's request for ETP to retain the $20,000.00 SLRP incentive. The applicant became a Mil Tech on 21 December 2009, in apparent violation of the enlistment addendum which authorized him the SLRP incentive; however, at the time the applicant became a Mil Tech, ARNG policy regarding eligibility in the SLRP was not clearly defined as...