Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004815
Original file (20120004815.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

	
		BOARD DATE:	  20 September 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120004815 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart.

2.  The applicant states, while in search of the enemy, he was stuck in the right arm by a punji stick approximately 2 inches above the elbow and he was later treated at the fire support base.

3.  The applicant provides a letter from a former Soldier.

COUNSEL'S REQUEST, STATEMENT AND EVIDENCE:

1.  Although the applicant lists a Service Officer for the State of Arkansas Veterans Affairs as Counsel, he did not render a request on the applicant’s behalf.

2.  Counsel provides no additional statement. 

3.  Counsel provides no additional evidence.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 26 July 1966.  He completed training and he was awarded military occupational specialty 71B (Clerk Typist).  The highest rank/grade he attained while serving on active duty was specialist four (SP4)/E-4.  He served in the Republic of Vietnam from 
1 December 1967 to 26 November 1968.

3.  Item 40 (Wounds) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) is blank.  Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) does not show award of the Purple Heart.

4.  On 25 July 1969, he was honorably released from active duty and he was transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Reinforcement) to complete his remaining Reserve obligation.  He completed 3 years of total active service.  The applicant's DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) he was issued at the time does not show award of the Purple Heart.

5.  The applicant's Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR) contains no medical records showing he was wounded in action or treated for a wound received as a result of enemy action.  His AMHRR also does not contain orders awarding him the Purple Heart.

6.  A review of The Adjutant General's Office, Casualty Division's Vietnam casualty listing does not show the applicant's name as a casualty.

7.  A review of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System, an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the U.S. Army Human Resources Command, failed to reveal any orders for the Purple Heart pertaining to the applicant.

8.  The applicant provides a statement from a former Soldier who states the applicant was reassigned from communications to the infantry.  The statement does not contain any information pertaining to the applicant receiving an injury that required medical attention.
9.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides the Army's awards policy.  Paragraph 2-8 contains guidance on the Purple Heart.  It states the Purple Heart is awarded to members wounded in action and states that in order 
to award the Purple Heart, there must be evidence the wound for which the award is being made was received as a result of enemy action, the wound required treatment by military medical personnel, and a record of the medical treatment was made a matter of official record.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's request for award of the Purple Heart was carefully considered.

2.  Notwithstanding the applicant’s statement, in order to support award of the Purple Heart the member must have been wounded in action and there must be evidence the wound for which the award is being made was received as a result of enemy action.  The wound must have also required medical treatment by military medical personnel and this medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.

3.  The applicant's service in the Republic of Vietnam and his sincerity are not in question.  However, his record contains no medical treatment records or other documentation which confirms he was wounded as a result of enemy action or treated for a combat-related wound or injury while serving in the Republic of Vietnam.  The regulatory burden of proof necessary to support award of the Purple Heart has not been met in this case.

4.  In view of the foregoing, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__X___  ___X_____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION




BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   X_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120004815



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120004815



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120017754

    Original file (20120017754.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, both he and his former commander state the Purple Heart was pinned on him by General Williamson of the 25th Infantry Division along with a Silver Star, for action on 18 September 1968. c. The following morning, 18 September 1968, the applicant returned from the ambush with two Soldiers who had been seriously wounded and were medically evacuated for hospital care and four or five others who received minor wounds to include the applicant who were treated by the firebase medics. It...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018703

    Original file (20110018703.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides the Army's awards policy. It states the Purple Heart is awarded to members wounded in action and states that in order to award the Purple Heart, there must be evidence the wound for which the award is being made was received as a result of enemy action, the wound required treatment by military medical personnel, and a record of the medical treatment was made a matter of official record. Notwithstanding the applicant’s witness statement,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015625

    Original file (20130015625.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his record to show award of the Purple Heart. His military records also do not contain orders awarding him the Purple Heart. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Purple Heart is awarded to members wounded in action and states that in order to award the Purple Heart, there must be evidence the wound for which the award is being made was received as a result of enemy action, the wound required treatment by military medical personnel, and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019936

    Original file (20110019936.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    It states the Purple Heart is awarded to members wounded in action and states that in order to award the Purple Heart, there must be evidence the wound for which the award is being made was received as a result of enemy action, the wound required treatment by military medical personnel, and a record of the medical treatment was made a matter of official record. The applicant's request for award of the Purple Heart based on wounds received in the Republic of Vietnam on 18 December 1968 has...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016109

    Original file (20130016109.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He departed Vietnam en-route to the United States on 10 February 1970. Although he provides evidence showing he was treated for a shrapnel wound to his buttock, there is no evidence in the available record, nor has the applicant provided any evidence showing he was wounded as a result of hostile action by enemy forces. _______ _ x _______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012561

    Original file (20110012561.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states he was wounded by mortar shrapnel from enemy fire while serving in the Republic of Vietnam. It states the Purple Heart is awarded to members wounded in action and states that in order to award the Purple Heart, there must be evidence the wound for which the award is being made was received as a result of enemy action, the wound required treatment by military medical personnel, and a record of the medical treatment was made a matter of official record. In order to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007279

    Original file (20140007279.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). His record contains a DA Form 8-275-3 (Clinical Record Cover Sheet) that shows he was attacked by a Vietnamese civilian and cut across his forearm in two places with a machete on 2 October 1966, while on duty in the Republic of Vietnam. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008628

    Original file (20120008628.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). In order to support award of the Purple Heart, the member must have been wounded in action and there must be evidence to show the wound for which the award is being made was received as a result of enemy action. __________X____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017004

    Original file (20110017004.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant's official military personnel file (OMPF) is void of orders or documents that indicate he was recommended for or awarded the Purple Heart by proper authority while serving on active duty. It states the Purple Heart is awarded to members wounded in action and states that in order to award the Purple Heart, there must be evidence the wound for which the award is being made was received...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026097

    Original file (20100026097.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he served in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) from 6 June 1966 to 4 June 1967, and from 14 February through 15 May 1968. This document does not show that the applicant was wounded in action. Notwithstanding the staff DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS above, the Board believed that there was sufficient evidence to show the applicant was wounded as a result of hostile fire action.