Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015625
Original file (20130015625.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	

		BOARD DATE:	    13 May 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130015625 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his record to show award of the Purple Heart.

2.  The applicant states he was injured in combat in the Republic of Vietnam and he still has pieces of metal in his body from his wounds.  He was told he would receive the Purple Heart due to his injuries.  

3.  The applicant provides no additional evidence.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 12 May 1966.  He completed training and he was awarded military occupational specialty  12B (Combat Engineer).  His record shows he served in the Republic of Vietnam for the period 20 August 1967 through 13 May 1968.

3.  On 16 May 1968, he was honorably released from active duty.  The DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) he received does not show award of the Purple Heart.

4. The applicant's military records contain no medical records showing he was wounded in action or treated for a wound received as a result of enemy action.  His military records also do not contain orders awarding him the Purple Heart.

5.  His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in:

* item 40 (Wounds) no entry
* item 41 (Awards and Decorations) no entry for award of the Purple Heart

6.  A review of The Adjutant General's Office Casualty Division's Vietnam Casualty Listing does not show the applicant's name as a casualty.

7.  A review of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System, an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the U.S. Army Human Resources Command Military Awards Branch, failed to reveal any orders for the Purple Heart pertaining to the applicant.
 
8.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Purple Heart is awarded to members wounded in action and states that in order to award the Purple Heart, there must be evidence the wound for which the award is being made was received as a result of enemy action, the wound required treatment by military medical personnel, and a record of the medical treatment was made a matter of official record.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's request for correction of his record to show award of the Purple Heart was carefully considered and it was determined there is insufficient evidence to support his request.

2.  The Purple Heart differs from all other decorations in that an individual is not "recommended" for this decoration; rather, the individual is entitled to it upon meeting specific criteria.  Award of the Purple Heart requires a Soldier to have been injured or wounded by hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment for wounds or injuries received in action must have been made a matter of official record.

3.  The applicant's service in the Republic of Vietnam and his sincerity are not in question.  However, his record contains no medical treatment records or other documents which confirm he was wounded as a result of enemy action or treated for a combat-related wound or injury while serving in the Republic of Vietnam.  The regulatory burden of proof necessary to support award of the Purple Heart has not been met; therefore, it would not be appropriate to award the applicant the Purple Heart.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X___  ___X____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   _X___   ___
               CHAIRPERSON

I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130015625





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130015625



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110002218

    Original file (20110002218.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's records show he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 6 July 1967. Item 40 (Wounds) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not show a combat wound and item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of this form does not show award of the Purple Heart. Notwithstanding his sincerity, in the absence of official documentary evidence such as operation orders, morning reports, after action reports, official orders to corroborate the events that led to his alleged...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011478

    Original file (20120011478.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart and correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show this award. There is nothing in several typical sources that show he was wounded in action or awarded the Purple Heart: * Item 40 (Wounds) of his DA Form 20 does not reflect a combat injury * Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of this form does not list the Purple Heart * His available medical records do not reflect a combat injury or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016507

    Original file (20110016507.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 40 (Wounds) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not show a combat wound and item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of this form does not show award of the Purple Heart. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record: a. Notwithstanding his sincerity as well as that of his buddies, in the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021655

    Original file (20140021655.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 6 August 1969, the helicopter he was on, as a crewmember, was shot down by the enemy in Vietnam. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action. In the absence of documentation that conclusively shows he was wounded or injured as a result of enemy action and treated for those wounds, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis for awarding him the Purple Heart.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019105

    Original file (20100019105.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, states the Army Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who have completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. The evidence of record shows he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for exemplary behavior, efficiency, and fidelity...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019277

    Original file (20100019277.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides for the following awards: a. The evidence of record shows the applicant served a qualifying period of service for award of the National Defense Service Medal. Notwithstanding the applicant's sincerity, in the absence of official documentary evidence such as operation orders, morning reports, after action reports, official orders to corroborate the events that led to his alleged injury, or additional documentation that conclusively shows...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016455

    Original file (20100016455.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In awarding him the additional awards, HRC officials considered the request for award of the Purple Heart but determined there was insufficient evidence to show the helicopter crash – and thus his injury – was the result of enemy action. U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 (Decorations and Awards) stated the authority to award the Purple Heart was delegated to hospital commanders. The FSM's service record is void of any orders that show he was awarded the Purple Heart, his name is not shown...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003577

    Original file (20090003577.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The available evidence shows the applicant suffered an injury to his foot as a result of a grenade explosion in the Republic of Vietnam on 14 September 1970 and that he was treated at various hospitals for this wound. In fact, none of the medical forms prepared at the different hospitals indicates that his wound was a result of hostile action. In the absence of documentation that conclusively show his grenade injury was a result of hostile action, there is insufficient evidence upon which...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020142

    Original file (20130020142.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Counsel states: a. the applicant's medical records show he was treated for wounds received during a rocket attack during the night of 13 and/or 14 April 1969; b. that Army Regulation 600-8-2 states in: (1) paragraph 2-8f, "when contemplating an award of this decoration, the key issue that commanders must take into consideration is the degree to which the enemy caused the injury. The applicant submitted: a. a letter to HRC, dated 18 January 2013, requesting retroactive award of the Purple...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010123

    Original file (20140010123.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20070004987 on 1 November 2007. He states his medical records show the wound being cleaned but he does not provide those medical records. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against an enemy or as...