Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004205
Original file (20120004205.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  21 June 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120004205 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to document her attendance at the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences (USUHS).  

2.  The applicant states there is currently no comment on her DD Form 214 documenting her completion of USUHS.  She claims the lack of this entry will impact her civil service retirement calculation.  

3.  The applicant provides the six attachments identified in her application in support of her request.  

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The record shows the applicant was appointed a second lieutenant in the Medical Service Corps (MSC) of U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) on 27 April 1989 in order to attend USUHS.  

3.  On 18 July 1989, the applicant entered USUHS to complete her medical degree and on 15 May 1993, she graduated from USUHS and received a Doctor of Medicine degree and entered active duty as a captain in the Medical Corps (MC).  

4.  On 30 September 2006, the applicant was honorably discharged in the rank of lieutenant colonel.  The DD Form 214 she was issued at the time does not document her attendance at USUHS.  

5.  Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense Memorandum , dated 1 July 2002, provided uniform guidance for computing military retired and retainer pay when a member was a medical student at the USUHS.  It stated, in pertinent part, that years of service at USUHS as a medical student are creditable in computing retired pay and as a result Military Service Departments and Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) should establish procedures to show such service is credited as appropriate and to identify persons effected by this policy.  

6.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents that must be prepared for Soldiers on retirement, discharge, release from active duty service, or control of the Active Army.  It also establishes standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  Chapter 2 contains provides item-by-item preparation instructions for the DD Form 214.  The instructions for item 18 state, in pertinent part, that item 18 (Remarks) will be used for Headquarters, Department of the Army (HQDA) requirements when a separate item is not available.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

The applicant’s request to document her attendance at USUHS on her DD Form 214 has been carefully considered and found to have merit.  Although not a required entry on the DD Form 214, it will do no harm to add the following entry to item 18 of the applicant’s DD Form 214, “CREDITABLE SERVICE AT USUHS FROM 19890718-19930515.”



BOARD VOTE:

____X____  ____X____  ____X____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending item 18 of her DD Form 214 by adding the entry, “CREDITABLE SERVICE AT USUHS FROM 19890718-19930515.”



      _______ _   __X_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120004205





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120004205



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090019539

    Original file (20090019539.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that the date on her DD Form 214 should be corrected to show she entered AD on 17 August 1977 since she was attending the Uniformed Services University of Health Sciences (USUHS) as a second lieutenant (2LT) at that time. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. Based on the foregoing, there is insufficient evidence and the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001061443C070421

    Original file (2001061443C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. As stated by the applicant, this Board reconsidered the requests of 14 USUHS graduates (Class of 1987) who were seeking 4 years' constructive service credit for attendance at USUHS and had been previously denied. In this letter, the former USMA Surgeon stated unequivocally that he told prospective USUHS students from the USMA Class of 1983 that they would receive...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110009431

    Original file (20110009431.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Before the Act was implemented, medical officers who graduated from USUHS and HPSP received 4 years of constructive service credit for training. The classes of 1982 through 1984 entered on active duty before the Act was implemented; therefore, they received 4 years of constructive service credit. Section 1 (constructive service) of sub-paragraph E states some medical and dental officers are entitled to extra credit for longevity purposes to reflect the time spent in medical or dental school.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03546

    Original file (BC 2014 03546.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03546 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her records be corrected to reflect that she entered the Uniform Services University of the Health Sciences (USUHS) on 14 Sep 81 per Directive Number 974 (Docket No. STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandums prepared by the Air Force offices of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100025905

    Original file (20100025905.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * her Oath of Office * her disenrollment letter, dated 6 November 2007, from USUHS * active duty orders to USUHS * orders for promotion to first lieutenant * DA Form 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report), dated * 22 July 2005, from the Army Medical Department (AMEDD) Officer Basic Course (OBC) * DA Form 1059, dated 24 April 2008, from the Basic Officer Leadership Course Phase II (BOLC II) * DA Form 1059, dated 17 June 2008, from AMEDD OBLC * DA Form 67-9...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011111

    Original file (20090011111.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The advisory opinion was provided to the applicant for comment and he responded to the effect that while the statutes governing USUHS students address service credit and promotion eligibility while in the USUHS Program, they do not address accrual of promotion eligibility once an individual is serving outside of the USUHS Program. Although the applicant is not entitled to service credit for the time he spent in the USUHS Program, the fact remains that he served on active duty and was paid...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001854

    Original file (20110001854.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of the computation of his retired pay, in effect, by: a. correcting his retirement order to show inclusion of his 4 years of constructive service credit (CSC) for longevity and percentage for retirement pay purposes; and b. requesting the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) complete a thorough audit of his retired pay computations to include recalculation of retired pay commencing 1 February 2010, payment of the difference in retired pay for the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00774

    Original file (BC-2013-00774.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which is at Exhibit C and D. ________________________________________________________________ _ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIPV recommends denial. The complete DPSIPV evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. APFC/DPSOR recommends the applicant’s DD Form 214 be corrected to read, “Attended Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 03098817C070212

    Original file (03098817C070212.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Just as the USMA graduates made career decisions based on Col T's (former Acting Surgeon, United States Military Academy) erroneous information concerning USUHS and longevity credit, he made a career decision based on the erroneous information contained in the USUHS bulletin and the 14 October 1982 briefing. The applicant provides a 29 September 1998 letter from the USUHS General Counsel to the Secretary of Defense, in which the General Counsel outlined the University's position that all...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC 2011 04047

    Original file (BC 2011 04047.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant contends that she should be eligible for promotion consideration by a Special Selection Board based on precedent that has been established in similar cases decided by this Board in BC-1996- 01097 and the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in AR20090011111 and AR20100025905. Although the applicant was eliminated from medical school on 25 Jun 10, she remained assigned to USUHS on active duty in a student status until such time as she was discharged. The...